Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I get the impression you have no idea what 'planned obsolescence' is, but you saw the term somewhere and you're determined to use it anyway.

Apple didn't know the GPUs were defective until well after the model had been replaced. They covered them under a reasonable warranty following that, but the chips eventually were no longer manufactured. Stuff happens.
 
1631334627831.jpeg
 
After 2015, apple placed a limit on the hardware support, and becomes to classifie products as vintage and obsolate.
Apple has always done this. Obsolete has to do with them no longer making replacement parts. All manufactures do this. Is it right? Ehh debatable. You claim you’re worried about the environment but what’s the environmental impact of keeping an entire factory online just to make replacement parts for a now 10 year old computer? How many people are still using that machine everyday?

Mind you I actually owned and used a 2011 MacBook Pro 15” when they were new, so I know this issue well. Engineering mistakes happen. If you get 5-6 years out of a computer that’s pretty darn good in my opinion.
 
What do you think about this "last warning" apple send me? At this time...i was alone in Brazil, and covid pandemic was growing so fast, when i recived this "kind" message. I became terrified with the possibility they block my apple id and "notify my internet provider", and all my devices are from apple. I just was posting about my Logic board issue, that is a technical subject, its not inappropriate!! In Brazilian law to threat someone and causes an unfair harm is considered a crime. Its very serious. Apple could never send me a "warning" like this. Im not a criminal, im just a apple consumer.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
I get the impression you have no idea what 'planned obsolescence' is, but you saw the term somewhere and you're determined to use it anyway.

Apple didn't know the GPUs were defective until well after the model had been replaced. They covered them under a reasonable warranty following that, but the chips eventually were no longer manufactured. Stuff happens.
After this problem i became to search about it. My problem with my MBP became an cietific academic artical from my law degree. And Im very secure about the planned obsolescence. Its very common to find court decisions concerning to Apple obsolescence way of sealing products. Just check.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
After this problem i became to search about it. My problem with my MBP became an cietific academic artical from my law degree. And Im very secure about the planned obsolescence. Its very common to find court decisions concerning to Apple obsolescence way of sealing products. Just check.

Apple hit with another "programmed obsolescence" lawsuit

https://9to5mac.com › 2021/03/01


https://translate.google.com/transl...gal-planned-obsolescence/&prev=search&pto=aue
 

Stop Planned Obsolescence - the Apple Case | Euroconsumers

An unfair commercial practice, used by Apple all over the world



May 29, in Italy, the Administrative Court of Lazio confirmed the penalty of 10 million euros, imposed on October 24, 2019 by the Italian Antitrust Authority against Apple for unfair and aggressive commercial practices in relation to updating the IOS operating system. Apple, despite being aware of the damage that the update could have produced on the iPhones 6 series, deliberately failed to inform consumers who, on the contrary, were pushed to proceed with the update. This lack of information and loyalty from Apple forced consumers to replace a product that they otherwise would not have replaced, voluntarily creating a loss of performance. The same behavior was the focus of a class action in the United States where the preliminary proposed settlement calls for Apple to pay consumers $ 25 for each iPhone, with a minimum total payout of $ 310 million. Just like in Europe, American consumers contended that their phones performance deteriorated after Apple software updates. They said this misled them into believing their phones were near the end of their lifecycles, requiring replacements or new batteries. It is unequivocal that Apple has implemented a conduct, worldwide, aiming at increasing the replacement of old iPhones through a phenomenon that can be traced back to the so-called “planned obsolescence”. This conduct has caused tremendous damages, harming consumers and the environment.
 
You mean you would have sold it to some other guy? Looks like you really are a nice person…. I’m glad Apple didn’t help you.
In this case, its considered a major problem, so apple should refound any consumer with this problem, its the law in Australia and in Brazil.
 
You apple consumers army are people like me. Im not alone. The real army will be us: consumers with power, until then lets just talk...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
After 2015, apple placed a limit on the hardware support, and becomes to classifie products as vintage and obsolate.
To stop supporting old products is not the same as planned obsolescence. You are making an unfounded accusation that Apple designed your computer to fail. Faulty hardware is not proof that the company designed it to fail.

Like other posters, I have a ten year old laptop that, apart from the battery not living much longer, still works perfectly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
What do you think about this "last warning" apple send me? At this time...i was alone in Brazil, and covid pandemic was growing so fast, when i recived this "kind" message. I became terrified with the possibility they block my apple id and "notify my internet provider", and all my devices are from apple. I just was posting about my Logic board issue, that is a technical subject, its not inappropriate!! In Brazilian law to threat someone and causes an unfair harm is considered a crime. Its very serious. Apple could never send me a "warning" like this. Im not a criminal, im just a apple consumer.
I think that if you spammed Apple’s support forum with the same unfounded accusations as in this thread, the warning is perfectly reasonable. You. Are. Wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
I am not sure that OP knows what planned obsolescence means. Yes, those models had a known hardware issue. And Apple fulfilled their contractual obligations by repairing the computer two times. OP themselves writes that they could use the machine for eight years, in an industry where computers are usually replaced after four or five. OP is not entitled to unlimited repairs neither they are entitled to a product that never fails. Eight years are way longer than the average expected lifetime of a machine without known defects anyway.
 
Im not wrong. All my comments were related to my defect logic board that recorrently brokes. The warning is “perfectly resonabl” for whom????Nobody talks to me like that. Are you crazy???im impressed with you think this kind oi treatment is correct. Its a way to panic people…and for sure they will give up any claim because the were afraid, like i was. But t it doesn’t stop me. Im brave and like i said im not a regular consumer, im an worrior. Apple is so wrong, im the wrongesst person. Can they support this warning faciing justice?It is terrifing to anyone i showed.Their power struggle finding the consumer act 2010. Classes actions and regulates laws are being criated especially for them.. lets see how should they talk to consumers, i mean people that spedns money on their equipment!!! And expect a minimum respect.
There is nothing wrong with how they spoke to you. I think the fact that English is not your first language is skewing your perception.

And no, I am not crazy, thank you for asking. Perhaps you should look into how you speak to people.
 
Ahhh. The same old troll post over and over again:

Step 1- pick issue (any issue, the more random the better, even complaining about an 11 year old computer not being supported anymore)

Step 2- describe unrealistic expectations that no company on earth ascribes to, but that Apple should.

Step 3- wait for any disagreement and accuse said poster of blind Apple fanboyism, being a sheep, being anti consumer (insert choice here)

Step 4- repeat indefinitely
 
There is nothing wrong with how they spoke to you. I think the fact that English is not your first language is skewing your perception.

And no, I am not crazy, thank you for asking. Perhaps you should look into how you speak to people.
No no no..english is oblivious not my first language but i can feel the abuse on their frases. I can understand that i was clearly treathed by Apple. Am I wrong? I ask for English first language speakers to give their opinion!! Please!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
As an Australian vaguely familiar with Australian Consumer Law, which has been mentioned a few times here and would apply to this product, the word to remember is “reasonable”.

Would I be disappointed if a computer I was still actively using failed? Yes. Did I reasonably expect that computer would last ten years when I bought it? Definitely not.

As you drive around, if you look at the cars around you, they’re going to be (on average) ten years old. There are older cars around, which proves that cars can last longer, but when you buy a vehicle, you don’t reasonably expect it will work forever. Even if it does, newer, safer, more power efficient models are released that make it uneconomical to run your car. When enough people get rid of them, they become even more expensive to support, and companies eventually stop making parts.
Does new cars being safer and more efficient make yours less safe and less efficient than when you bought it? Course not, there’s no planned obsolescence there. Should a company keep making parts just for you when no one has that model anymore? Course not.

You mention worrying about the environment, but continuing to manufacture parts with low yield, and taking up additional land to keep these machines running also seems counterproductive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EmotionalSnow
Ahhh. The same old troll post over and over again:

Step 1- pick issue (any issue, the more random the better, even complaining about an 11 year old computer not being supported anymore)

Step 2- describe unrealistic expectations that no company on earth ascribes to, but that Apple should.

Step 3- wait for any disagreement and accuse said poster of blind Apple fanboyism, being a sheep, being anti consumer (insert choice here)

Step 4- repeat indefinitely
Who are you? Why you are against me? I just want justice. I didn’t know about the logic board defect, they should tell me. Defend Apple is really good? They should care about us. A minimum of care and fix their defects wold be great. Do you loose your time defending a company that turns products obsolete and delete post of consumers. No respect with our demands, no approach. Just terrible and inappropriate warning!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.