Please report your wrist size !!

Discussion in 'Apple Watch' started by firewood, Apr 13, 2015.

  1. firewood macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    #1
    If you don't state your wrist size, comments, such as the 38 mm seems too small or the 42 mm too big, are completely useless to someone with a very different wrist size.

    A 10% difference in Watch size might even look the exact opposite on someone with a 15% different wrist width.
     
  2. T-Will macrumors 6502a

    T-Will

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
  3. Brammy macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    #3
    205mm diameter.

    I ordered the 42mm Space Gray Sport. When I went to try it on, I was expecting I would be using one of the last holes on the band. Instead, I was still only half way.
     
  4. JohnApples macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2014
    #4
    160mm circumference, about 55mm width. Ordered the 42mm Space Grey Sport and it looks great! I do need the S/M band though!

    If there are any original Pebble owners who are wondering if the 42mm is too big, just look at your Pebble. If it fits you nicely, the Apple Watch will (and look better)!
     
  5. iamasmith macrumors 6502

    iamasmith

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2015
    Location:
    Cheshire, UK
    #5
    About 185mm ordered 42mm, been wearing big watches a while so it will seem small I'm sure.
     
  6. gr8tfly macrumors 603

    gr8tfly

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Location:
    ~119W 34N
    #6
    203mm

    Ordered 42mm SS Space Black w/ Link Bracelet. It's 205mm; I have a typical metal bracelet chronograph that I measured at 206mm (inside). It will fall down over my wrist bone; at other times feel a bit tight. So, I think I'll be ok with the AW link bracelet.

    I'll be curious to hear from someone with a similar wrist size who tried on the 42mm link bracelet.
     
  7. caligurl macrumors 68030

    caligurl

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    socal
    #8
    136mm
    fully covered with credit card test
    38mm confirmed after try on
     
  8. Boxmonkey macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2015
    #10
    190mm. 42mm watch is a little smaller than watches I usually wear, Tissot t-Race and a G-shock. But not too small.
     
  9. AustinBoilers macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2015
    #11
    150mm wrists. The 42mm looked ridiculous on me, the milanese loop almost wrapped all the way back to the watch.
     
  10. earthdog macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    #12
    I have a 210mm wrist order 42mm. I tried on ALL band types and they ALL fit with ease no matter what the Apple Sizing Chart says...
     
  11. slicecom macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #13
    180mm, going with the 38mm. I just think it looks better. Less like a tech gadget, more like a watch.
     
  12. daijholt macrumors 65816

    daijholt

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2013
    Location:
    Wales, UK
    #14
    155mm here, I've gone for the 38mm watch.wasnt informed so much by the size of the watch, but the size of the bands. 42mm Milanese loop doesn't leave much room for adjustment on my wrist.
     
  13. jbachandouris macrumors 601

    jbachandouris

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    #15
    155mm. No idea on the width.

    Even after two try on appointments I'm still torn between the 38mm and the 42mm. In pictures, the 42mm looks huge on me, but in person, it seems just right.
     
  14. gr8tfly macrumors 603

    gr8tfly

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Location:
    ~119W 34N
    #17
    Good to know! Thanks.
     
  15. Brammy macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    #19
    Same here. I'm 205, but at least the large sport was roomy.
     
  16. Wildgift macrumors 6502

    Wildgift

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    #21
    177, and really bummed I ordered a 38mm. Back of the line I go!
     
  17. noobinator macrumors 603

    noobinator

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Pasadena, CA
    #22
    A bit less than 150 and getting the 42 no questions asked.
     
  18. Daghis macrumors member

    Daghis

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    #23
    Right about 200 mm, and I'm happy with the 42 mm watch size.
     
  19. leesweet macrumors 65816

    leesweet

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Location:
    Northern Virginia, USA
    #24
    Lol, so, do we mean make a list of our wrist sizes, or, remind us to include it in general when we're commenting on how the watch (sizes) look, or bands look, on us in other threads?

    I'm getting stuck on what this thread's list of numbers is good for. :)

    (Um, 150 or so, if you really want to know...)
     
  20. nasa25 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Location:
    canada
    #25
    170mm
    Width 60mm

    Copping 38mm white sport aluminum
     

Share This Page