I suppose theft is against the law... But we all know that Apple is gonna make a bigger deal over this than normal. If they care this much they shouldn't have allowed someone to go to a bar with the prototype. And apparently the guy who lost it wasn't fired... Go figure.
Do you really think the police would react this much or even get involved at all if one of us lost a phone that was then sold for $5,000 then returned to us? They might do something, but they wouldn't be raiding houses taking away computers and hard drives. It would be a very low priority case.
**** you Apple.
Apple, at minimum, had to report the phone to the police as "stolen". If the item is never considered "stolen", then the police have *ZERO* reason to even investigate, much less get a warrant to search his home.
Mere press speculation and statements regarding the "stolen" nature of it is not sufficient as evidence that something was stolen.
Erm have you been living under a rock for the past week? It's not just a phone, it's a prototype, of which it is covered as Trade Secrets.
If they care this much they shouldn't have allowed someone to go to a bar with the prototype. And apparently the guy who lost it wasn't fired... Go figure.
Do you really think the police would react this much or even get involved at all if one of us lost a phone that was then sold for $5,000 then returned to us? They might do something, but they wouldn't be raiding houses taking away computers and hard drives. It would be a very low priority case.
I smell a lawsuit...
Journalism does not trump trafficking in stolen goods.
Paying for something which you know is not the lawful property of the seller is theft.
(g) No warrant shall issue for any item or items described in
Section 1070 of the Evidence Code.
(a) A publisher, editor, reporter, or other person connected
with or employed upon a newspaper, magazine, or other periodical
publication, or by a press association or wire service, or any person
who has been so connected or employed, cannot be adjudged in
contempt by a judicial, legislative, administrative body, or any
other body having the power to issue subpoenas, for refusing to
disclose, in any proceeding as defined in Section 901, the source of
any information procured while so connected or employed for
publication in a newspaper, magazine or other periodical publication,
or for refusing to disclose any unpublished information obtained or
prepared in gathering, receiving or processing of information for
communication to the public.
(b) Nor can a radio or television news reporter or other person
connected with or employed by a radio or television station, or any
person who has been so connected or employed, be so adjudged in
contempt for refusing to disclose the source of any information
procured while so connected or employed for news or news commentary
purposes on radio or television, or for refusing to disclose any
unpublished information obtained or prepared in gathering, receiving
or processing of information for communication to the public.
(c) As used in this section, "unpublished information" includes
information not disseminated to the public by the person from whom
disclosure is sought, whether or not related information has been
disseminated and includes, but is not limited to, all notes,
outtakes, photographs, tapes or other data of whatever sort not
itself disseminated to the public through a medium of communication,
whether or not published information based upon or related to such
material has been disseminated.
Wouldn't apple have to be the one to claim it was stolen to begin with? And did they?
I know perfectly well what it is. I still think it's seriously OTT.
As a publicly held corporation, Apple's goal is to maximize value for their stockholders. The loss of a high profile product- which is valued on its uniqueness, and secrecy, and surprise launches- is definitely something that harms the country.
Somehow methinks us popcorn-munchers aren't getting the full nuanced story.They asked Apple if they owned it. Apple said it wasn't theirs.
Buyer of stolen property has home raided by police. Sounds reasonable to me.
Do you really think the police would react this much or even get involved at all if one of us lost a phone that was then sold for $5,000 then returned to us? They might do something, but they wouldn't be raiding houses taking away computers and hard drives. It would be a very low priority case.
Except that the items seized were not stolen.![]()