This won't save you as much time as you think, as with security features disabled other apps may require you retype your service passwords (which are a lot longer than a PIN).
Last edited:
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Police Told to Avoid Looking at iPhone Screens Locked With Face ID
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
This won't save you as much time as you think, as with security features disabled other apps may require you retype your service passwords (which are a lot longer than a PIN).
Only if the fact that you know the password is in itself incriminating. Giving law enformcement with a warrant access to the (incriminating) contents of your phone by entering your passcode is not self incriminating. That's the difference. Let's say witnesses saw child porn on a phone (so police gets a warrant), but it is not known whether the phone is your phone or your mate's phone. By entering the passcode you admit that it was your phone. That's self incriminating. What the police finds, that is not self incriminating.
See above. Repeating your claim doesn't make it more true. If police with a warrant, and with the safe knowledge that you are the owner, asks you to unlock the phone that they know is yours, you have no 5th Amendment rights. You have the right not to tell them your password, but you MUST unlock the phone. Because showing them the contents of the phone is not self incrimination and not protected by the 5th amendment. If they don't know who the owner is, then by unlocking the phone you admit that you are the owner, which is self incrimination, and 5th Amendment allows you to refuse that.
Last edited:
If the police ask you for your pass code to unlock your phone, you can invoke your 5th Amendment right and stay silent.
And go to jail.
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article214948205.html
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...oduction-doesnt-violate-fifth-amendment.shtml
You may want to not be practicing law without a license.
Pretty sure if there is a warrant issued you can be ordered to unlock your phone just as you can be ordered to open your door. The door is of course easier for the police to break down with out assistance. However you will be held in contempt of court once the judge orders you to unlock the phone. If you don't have anything serious to hide you will most likely volunteer to do so after some time in a cell.
If you do not cooperate because of something to hide well you are locked up and off the streets anyway. I am not sure that the time you spend being in a cage for contempt of court will be applied to time served after you break down and are convicted afterward.
I am not sure you can invoke the 5th amendment as you are not being compelled to testify against yourself. You can not refuse to open the door to your house either in the face of a warrant because you are trying to hide a crime. I may not be 100% correct on all of this. However some of the lack of understanding of how laws and rights work here are mind baffling ignorant.
If you do not cooperate because of something to hide well you are locked up and off the streets anyway. I am not sure that the time you spend being in a cage for contempt of court will be applied to time served after you break down and are convicted afterward.
I am not sure you can invoke the 5th amendment as you are not being compelled to testify against yourself. You can not refuse to open the door to your house either in the face of a warrant because you are trying to hide a crime. I may not be 100% correct on all of this. However some of the lack of understanding of how laws and rights work here are mind baffling ignorant.
Ah gotta love this. Bunch of criminals on MR.
Listen up, police don’t give a damn about the average joe blow. They don’t care about your pics or your banking info. They want access into phones that belong to ppl in organized crime... aka where others are dying, so they can STOP CRIMINALS. If you’re not a criminal you got nothing to worry about.
If you’re against this then you don’t truly give a f what happens on around you (until your child or family is involved that is). People are dying daily, there’s kidnappings and other crime that goes unreported to the media. It could potentially be minimized but we can’t with silly laws.
My families safety is more important to me than you wanted to keep your sex tape safe from the police. If your sex tape gets released and it saves a life then so be it.
Listen up, police don’t give a damn about the average joe blow. They don’t care about your pics or your banking info. They want access into phones that belong to ppl in organized crime... aka where others are dying, so they can STOP CRIMINALS. If you’re not a criminal you got nothing to worry about.
If you’re against this then you don’t truly give a f what happens on around you (until your child or family is involved that is). People are dying daily, there’s kidnappings and other crime that goes unreported to the media. It could potentially be minimized but we can’t with silly laws.
My families safety is more important to me than you wanted to keep your sex tape safe from the police. If your sex tape gets released and it saves a life then so be it.
You know a lot of people live in places where the government does not respect human rights, and it’s “criminal” to, for example, support a different political party or to belong to a religion. So perhaps instead of lecturing anybody about how you are all concerned that your neighbors are going to rape your dog, you might want to think about the fact that iPhones are sold globally, there are places other than your little neighborhood, and billions of people live in places where they can be killed for no other reason than a police official finding out they read the wrong blog or message the wrong friend.
It is, but it's not very convenient, which is the whole reason Apple introduced biometrics to begin with.
Also if you are actually innocent of a crime the info on your phone is likely to be exculpatory. You couldn't ask for a better alibi assuming you didn't do it.
Or you could live someplace other than a western democracy where you can be breaking the law by voting for the wrong person or reading the wrong book, and you have good reason to want to hide your phone contents even though you are “guilty.”
That’s not what we are worried about. If the good guys can have access, guess what? The bad guys will have access to this. Identify theft will rise and other crimes.
We had a guy in the office, whose daughter bought a new iPhone, and she left the old one in a drawer. He decided to use it - and she had forgotten the passcode (after a year in the drawer). Somehow managed to reset it through iTunes.
Lesson: If you stop using your phone, do a factory reset.
[doublepost=1539564113][/doublepost]
But what if someone abducts a child and they find his phone? Answer: if they have the phone, and they can ask him to unlock the phone, then they have the guy as well. The knowledge where the child is is in his mind. If you can make him tell you the passcode, you can also make him tell you where the child is. And if you can't make him tell you where the child is, you can't make him tell you the passcode. Plus what are the chances that he was stupid enough to leave evidence on his phone?
There are times the police could use the information in your iOS device to get a search warrant or an arrest warrant. It could be used as a fishing expedition. Here’s an example. Mr Hypothetical is arrested for writing a bad check. It was a simple math error, but while searching through the iPhone, the police discovers texts between Mr Hypothetical and his weed dealer. This information could now be used to get a search warrant for his home, car, etc, but it could also be used to go after the weed dealer. Completely unrelated to the arrest for the bad check.
Then they would just torture you to gain access. If you live in a place like Saudi Arabia things are much different. This is an obvious and pointless statement that doesn't add to the conversation.
Believe it or not, there are places where they opportunistically check your phone but don’t jump straight to torture.
For Christ’s sake.
Never realized there were so many fans of the police state on Macrumors.
This no longer has anything to do with the article which is simply cops being instructed to not look at iPhones too often. It is really the epitome of making mountain and mole hills. Security hasn't changed at all just a random instruction to cops about how to handle evidence.
You did mention places that do not follow democratic principles. Can you give me an example of a place that does that and doesn't resort to torture, and opportunistically doesn't look at your iPhone on the spot so they can keep it and access it through Face ID later?
The "For Christ's sake" comment was also uncalled for.
[doublepost=1539567837][/doublepost]
Mr. Hypothetical will have his lawyer move to have all evidence gathered from his phone with out a warrant to be held inadmissible and walk. If Mr. Hypothetical voluntarily unlocked his phone then it's on him.
Last edited:
It isn't that simple. If you are actually guilty you would love a cop to open your phone without consent or a warrant. From that moment on anything they find is not going to be admitted.
Seems there should be an option in settings to require both Face ID and passcode along with a sequential button press to enable same option if it’s not currently enabled.
Haven't used a phone with Face ID but it seems like you could set it to require a passcode after a certain amount of time such as 1 minute or an hour of inactivity? I think this is already an option. For the people with James Bond spy scenarios use only a passcode. Face ID is definitely not ready for high risk espionage operations.
Apple needs to make a 'trigger expression' that can be set by the user that disables FaceID once the iPhone recognizes it.
