Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

[POLL] Do you own a Blu-Ray player?

Do you own a Blu-Ray player?

  • Yes

    Votes: 86 54.4%

  • No

    Votes: 72 45.6%
  • Total voters
    158
Old Fashioned

I still owned the old fashioned DVD player. If that's what you call it. LOL. For now, I can't afford the Blu-ray player because it is costly. :(
 
At 100$, I have a hard time believing any Mac users would find a Blu-ray player "costly".

I have 2 Blu-ray players. My PS3 hooked up to the 42 incher 1080p 120 hz set and a LG stand-alone hooked up to an older Sony 32 inch 720p set. The best part of Blu-ray is you don't have to "upgrade" your entire catalog of titles since those players still play DVDs.
 
The quality of older releases on Blu-Ray is not as spectacular as new movies. These films are usually not remastered to take full advantage of the new technology.
 
senseless said:
The quality of older releases on Blu-Ray is not as spectacular as new movies. These films are usually not remastered to take full advantage of the new technology.
Click to expand...
That's why you check the reviews on older movies on BluRay first. The Ten Commandments, for example, is an utterly amazing remaster on BluRay (they scanned it in 6K).
 
Hellhammer said:
Yet another PS3 owner here. Sometimes used for watching rented Blu-Rays but nowadays I mainly watch downloaded Blu-Ray rips (we don't have to go through that piracy discussions again, please).
Click to expand...

Then don't mention it. Can you realistically not expect a reaction when you say you steal stuff?
 
Got one last black Friday to go along with the new 1080p set. The picture quality is much improved over DVD but, for me, the major advancement was in the transition to digital so the differences are not as big. I had a nice VHS deck but when I went to a DVD the differences were large, particularly when I got the EDTV plasma which was ideal for DVD. On BD, it's more the pixel detail although there is also additional color detail as well. I decided that now was the time as I had the tv, a TrueHD capable amp and DVD/BD combo packs were being priced close to DVD. I still need DVD for the portable players but only for select movies. Oddly enough, I find I'm not using the BD as much as I thought I would; usually only for blockbusters and the like. This has only been made worse with the addition of Netflix but since my Internet is capped, I feel I'll still be using the player for a while.

Tl;dr: it's nice, but not essential to me.
 
Fubar1977 said:
And if YOU ACTUALLY READ MY POST you would see that at NO POINT did I say there was no difference between DVD and Blu-Ray just that it wasn`t like the MASSIVE leap from VHS.

Perhaps it`s YOUR eyes that need checking.

To say the difference between DVD and Blu-Ray is Night and Day is just ridiculous.

Flame on...time will prove me right, as the sales figures already are :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It was proven before this post that the difference between blu-ray and DVD is far bigger than the difference between DVD and VHS. I actually read your post, and your claim was false.

I own a blu-ray player, and I can assure you that the difference is massive. If you are watching on a 42" TV or some other small screen...OF COURSE the difference will be barely noticeable, and not worth the upgrade. I watch movies usually on a 100" projection screen. I assure you the difference is VERY noticeable. From the quality of the image to the quality of the sound, it's all much better. Plus, I have found that blu-ray has much better special features. I'm as interested in the special features as I am in the movie, so streaming isn't as big for me.

The reason Blu-Ray hasn't taken off like DVD did (even though it took years for DVD to become a big seller), is that there are many more ways to acquire media nowadays, and because many haven't gotten the larger screen needed to fully appreciate it. Back then, you had VHS and DVD, maybe LaserDisc if you were a real hipster. Now, you have DVD, BD, NetFlix, Hulu, RedBox, iTunes, Pirating...so many more source choices.

Blu-Ray is sort of expensive, which is why it isn't taking off. The general crowd might not care about super high quality, while there are those out there that do. Just as I don't care if my car has 14 speakers and 7 subwoofers and can be heard across the city, some people want that. Some people are fine with Apple earbuds, some will only wear two grapefruits on their head so they can hear ever nuance of their Lady Gaga.
 
Blue ray is THE current reference standard for movies--there is nothing better for the home theater--so if you want to watch movies with true 1080p/24 and lossless audio--Blu Ray is it. :)
 
samiwas said:
It was proven before this post that the difference between blu-ray and DVD is far bigger than the difference between DVD and VHS. I actually read your post, and your claim was false.
Click to expand...
actually, nothing was proven. Greater resolution increase is not the whole story, not by a long shot. The transition from analog to digital has a much bigger impact, IMO.

I own a blu-ray player, and I can assure you that the difference is massive. If you are watching on a 42" TV or some other small screen...OF COURSE the difference will be barely noticeable, and not worth the upgrade. I watch movies usually on a 100" projection screen. I assure you the difference is VERY noticeable. From the quality of the image to the quality of the sound, it's all much better.
Click to expand...

It's not just screen size and resolution but viewing distance as well. Most people will be judging BD based on standard set sizes in the the 32-60" range. Depending on your viewing distance, this can have either a dramatic impact or no impact whatsoever.

Plus, I have found that blu-ray has much better special features. I'm as interested in the special features as I am in the movie, so streaming isn't as big for me.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... BDLive is a big disappointment for me. I'd rather waste the bandwidth on streaming. Some BD disks do have lots of extra special features which a movie buff might enjoy.
 
Hellhammer said:
Yet another PS3 owner here. Sometimes used for watching rented Blu-Rays but nowadays I mainly watch downloaded Blu-Ray rips (we don't have to go through that piracy discussions again, please).
Click to expand...

Don't worry, I pirate TV shows then burn them to disks too :D Fox is too greedy.

Sadly though in September a new piracy law comes into effect here :(

CDs are still being sold even though you have been able to download them for years
Click to expand...

Really... Do music CDs still exist? I've downloaded music ever since, well, forever.
 
Last edited:
We have one for the living room. It's a small (but noticeable) improvement over HD via cable, and a pretty substantial improvement over DVD. That said, the quality of upscaled DVD isn't that bad, so we're not rushing out to replace our DVD collection. Heck, most of the time content is being streamed from the ATV anyway.

So we have one, but it spends most of its time upscaling DVDs, showing off the entertainment system, or playing a Blu-Ray disc that someone brought over.
 
mrsir2009 said:
Really... Do music CDs still exist? I've downloaded music ever since, well, forever.
Click to expand...

Definitely. There are still plenty of stores that sell solely CDs. Even though I torrent my videos, I still buy CDs occasionally.

NPD--Slide1.jpg


While that is not 2011, it's pretty recent. I'm actually surprised how many physical CDs were sold back then. While the numbers may now be below 20%, it's still a big market, especially when considering how many people don't even pay for their music according to that graph :p
 
I am also in the PS3 section...

If it was in the PS3 I would not have one. I have watched exactly 1 Blu-Ray movie on it.
 
Yes, I have a cheap region-free Blu-ray player. The picture quality isn't as good as my old HD DVD player, but I have no doubts that that's due to the player quality rather than the format itself. It's still leaps and bounds better than DVD.
 
I've had one for a couple of years, and had an HD DVD player before that. Most people I know don't care, even if they can see the difference, but I appreciate the quality upgrade. I have a 52" TV though, I think on smaller sets it's not worth the upgrade.
 
One feature I really miss from good old VHS tapes was the ability to tape anything off regular TV onto a blank tape using your standard VHS cassete player. And you can tape over things as many times as you like :) Man, I miss tapes. Here in NZ we were using them standard up until a few years ago. I remember when the local Video Ezy were selling all their old VHS tapes for next to nothing when they were replacing them with DVDs. I brought a ton ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back