Thanks shoeshine boy. You're both humble and lovable.There won't be a Mac Pro released on the 15th. But if there is, leave your address and I will come over and give you and your wife a shoe shine.
Thanks shoeshine boy. You're both humble and lovable.There won't be a Mac Pro released on the 15th. But if there is, leave your address and I will come over and give you and your wife a shoe shine.
I would stay away from RAID 0 - RAID 1 is much safer !!
(see my reply to this guys post - https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/408504/)
RAID 5 is even better but I can't afford that or indeed have the space in the MP. Might look at buying an external RAID setup instead ? ? Any reccomendations anyone - need 500Gb- 1TB RAID 1 or maybe 5??
d![]()
I've had a RAID-0 drive running for 3 years now. Shouldn't be a concern if you take the time to do a proper backup now and then.
RAID0 simply doubles your odds of losing the partition to a hardware failure. It's not dramatic, but it is double.![]()
Given the kexts for new graphics cards in the 10.5.2 release, either they are going to release the Mac Pro on the 15th or the Nano is going to have one hell of a graphics card.![]()
The change in dot pitch would be very insignificant when moving from a 23" to a 24". Furthermore, 23" panels are dead. They would need to move to a 24" to keep the latest tech. As in the H-IPS panel in the 24" iMac.
And Mike, I hope it gets updated as well. I just gave up my two 24"s to move to a 30" when the Mac Pro gets updated. I didn't enjoy working with two displays much.
My plan is this:
Drive 1 (Seagate 1TB):
- Partition A (150 GB): boot drive with OS X & apps
- Partition B (800 GB): Time Machine backup of RAID
Drives 2 & 3 (2x 750 GB SE2 in RAID 0)
- user directory and image files
Drive 4 (Seagate 1TB):
- Partition A (100 GB): Photoshop scratch
- Partition B (bootable clone of Drive 1, A)
Slapping two cores on one PCB is a failure for innovation (think 3Dfx...)
I don't understand what you are trying to say.
My limited knowledge of 3dfx goes like this...
VooDoo 5 5000/5500 were dual gpu cards.
VooDoo 5 cards were unable to use all of the available memory of the gpus.
Voodoo 5 cards had a low demand.
But what does this have to do with nVidia and ATI's upcoming dual gpu cards?
I am considering buying a MP. It depends on what apple releases. I have a 2.4ghz,2GB,1GB,everthing silentpcreview-recommends, 8months old PC which I would like to replace. But it will have to be worth the money and effort for me to take the step.
What I would like:
*smaller design(new xeon require less power, less cooling etc)
*new gen xeon
*better performance RAM
*8800gts with a silent cooler
*even more silent 120mm fans
*mtron SSD system disc, with 4 empty discslots (would be awesome but not gonna happen)
*dvd with easy to install blueray (futuresafe)
*reasonable price
Not to get people's hope up but the next Leopard update (10.5.2) is supposed to bring support for the Radeon HD 3800 series and Geforce 8800 (GT/GTS 512MB) series.
I don't understand your fascination of Solid-State Disks. They still do not outperform older rotational drives, have way less storage and the cost is too high. Besides what good would a 32GB Solid-State Disk do for a workstation? That's an insult if anything.
This clearly shows the lack of innovation in the graphics market. Over a year later and still only 30% faster than the Geforce 8800 Ultra while using two cores instead of one.
This board will use in excess of 200 Watt or around.
I am not intrigued by the Radeon HD3800GX2 either...
I want a monolithic chip and not something stitched together for now.