They admitted the issue. They gave facts, statistics, etc. They gave a (free) solution. They will refund those who already have the solution.
i particularly enjoyed the portion whereby the same problem was replicated on the other phones. dissing the other makers to shut their trap about being able to hold it anyhow they like. and the media for blowing it out of proportions.
"Apple's attempt to draw RIM into Apple's self-made debacle is unacceptable. Apple's claims about RIM products appear to be deliberate attempts to distort the public's understanding of an antenna design issue and to deflect attention from Apple's difficult situation. RIM is a global leader in antenna design and has been successfully designing industry-leading wireless data products with efficient and effective radio performance for over 20 years. During that time, RIM has avoided designs like the one Apple used in the iPhone 4 and instead has used innovative designs which reduce the risk for dropped calls, especially in areas of lower coverage. One thing is for certain, RIM's customers don't need to use a case for their BlackBerry smartphone to maintain proper connectivity. Apple clearly made certain design decisions and it should take responsibility for these decisions rather than trying to draw RIM and others into a situation that relates specifically to Apple."
- Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie
What's the point of this? Like anyone expected the other manufacturers to say anything different. Notice there is no denial anywhere that their phones perform the same way as the iP4. From what I saw in the video, RIM should also offer free cases to Blackberry Bold owners. All Blackberry owners should be up in arms over RIM's deception and denial. Right?
I'm curious for those who marked 'completely unsatisfied', what would have appeased you?
From what I saw in the video, RIM should also offer free cases to Blackberry Bold owners. All Blackberry owners should be up in arms over RIM's deception and denial. Right?
You are wrong...do you remember this picture ? why did it have a case.....?
![]()
i particularly enjoyed the portion whereby the same problem was replicated on the other phones. dissing the other makers to shut their trap about being able to hold it anyhow they like. and the media for blowing it out of proportions.
To be honest, it was a 10, and that's being objective. They're giving you a free case if you want to keep the iPhone and you can always return the phone if you don't. I don't see what else you people want.
I give it a 2 overall.
The free bumpers idea is about a 5. It would have been a 7 if they had done it on day two or three of the crisis. However, after all of the lies, arrogance, disrespect, lack of accountability, etc., all of which still remain today, I have lost my faith in Apple. Whereas on my last electronics cycle it was the default choice, Apple is just like any other company now. I'll be thoroughly checking out my other options before making a purchase decision on the next go-round.
"Apple's attempt to draw RIM into Apple's self-made debacle is unacceptable. Apple's claims about RIM products appear to be deliberate attempts to distort the public's understanding of an antenna design issue and to deflect attention from Apple's difficult situation. RIM is a global leader in antenna design and has been successfully designing industry-leading wireless data products with efficient and effective radio performance for over 20 years. During that time, RIM has avoided designs like the one Apple used in the iPhone 4 and instead has used innovative designs which reduce the risk for dropped calls, especially in areas of lower coverage. One thing is for certain, RIM's customers don't need to use a case for their BlackBerry smartphone to maintain proper connectivity. Apple clearly made certain design decisions and it should take responsibility for these decisions rather than trying to draw RIM and others into a situation that relates specifically to Apple."
- Mike Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie
I'm curious for those who marked 'completely unsatisfied', what would have appeased you?