What is it with everyone failing to understand that he is not expecting to get this repaired under warranty and fully upfront with his asking to pay for the repair himself?
Too busy jacking off to thoughts about what Apple might release next.
What is it with everyone failing to understand that he is not expecting to get this repaired under warranty and fully upfront with his asking to pay for the repair himself?
People who havent actually worked in service departments dont understand the risks involved in servicing this kind of unit and case especially when doing so places the unit back under warranty. Its a no brainer for us.Not always.
Even if you defend Apple, doesn't it bother you, even a little, that you paid 5K for a computer and the company that sold it to you, refuses to fix it and doesn't provide spare parts? (doesn't matter in how you damaged it)
I represent automotive OEMs and suppliers. I'm absolutely right.I work for an automotive supplier. You are absolutely wrong.
What law says Apple must repair something out of warranty, or if they won’t repair it that they must provide someone else parts?
That is not the issue. The issue is that he has done who knows what else to the unit DURING service. If those are the components damaged (PS, MLB, and LCD) thats a) basically a total and b) who knows what else is ****ed up. As the servicing department they'd be stamping the machine "back under warranty" upon its exit and would need to have confidence thats true. I would, in this case, NOT do this. Smart move by Apple. Totally consistent with norms. Game on.Too busy jacking off to thoughts about what Apple might release next.
I represent automotive OEMs and suppliers. I'm absolutely right.
No matter the damage, or the cause of the damage. If you can get a car into a dealership repair bay, they will gladly take your money to fix it every time.
[doublepost=1524076658][/doublepost]
None. That's the problem. If Apple won't do the right thing on their own, legislation is needed.
That's all good and acceptable. However it seems that the problem is that he can not buy parts at all, even to carry out the repair himself.
If that's the case, it's incredibly consumer hostile and frankly the kind of behaviour I'd expect to be regulated.
Good job reading the article. as stated in the article, 3rd parties do not have the parts. Otherwise he would have fixed it himselfAnytime Linus makes a video about an Apple product, he does so in a negative light. So this whole thing isn't surprising. Most of the time, official parts can be found on eBay and such, so let him shop there and repair it himself since he was so eager to take it apart.
Yes we can repair the computer for you it. Its going to cost $4999. Trust us it will look like a brand new computer. (smile)
Linus Sebastian, who runs the popular YouTube channel Linus Tech Tips, recently shared a video in which he claimed Apple and an Apple Authorized Service Provider denied to service his damaged iMac Pro.
![]()
For background, Sebastian and his team fully disassembled the iMac Pro in January for their video review, which shows components like the main logic board and memory modules laid out individually. The real-time footage of the damage occurring in the new video appears to be a reenactment with visual effects.
The damage resulted when they dropped the display while attempting to reattach it to the aluminum chassis. Towards the end of the video, Sebastian also says the iMac Pro requires a new logic board and power supply unit, suggesting there may have been a short circuit that caused damage to internal components as well.
Sebastian contacted Apple to inquire about repair options, and visited the Genius Bar at an Apple Store, but the company ultimately declined to service the iMac Pro. In an email, an Apple support advisor placed blame on limited availability of replacement parts, but the actual reason is likely rooted in policy.
As has long been the case, Apple's terms and conditions for repairs stipulates that the company will not service products that have failed due to "unauthorized modification," including "faulty installation, repair, or maintenance by anyone other than Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider."
Apple's limited one-year warranty is also void if a product has "damage caused by service, including upgrades and expansions, performed by anyone who is not a representative of Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider."
In his defense, Sebastian confirms he is aware of those policies, but his argument is that Apple should still be obligated to repair the iMac Pro if he pays out-of-warranty fees. In the video's comments section, reaction is mixed, with some people agreeing with him and others siding with Apple.
iMac Pro is a non-user-upgradeable, all-in-one workstation by design, so it's easy to see why Apple may not be interested in servicing one that was fully disassembled. While the team at Linus Tech Tips may be more tech savvy than some, a lot can go wrong when an average customer tampers with internals.
After the repair was declined by Apple, Sebastian and his team contacted an Apple Authorized Service Provider in Canada, where they are located. The repair shop also declined the repair, but their reason was allegedly that Apple has yet to offer the required certification courses to service the iMac Pro.
However, Apple's internal iMac Pro Service Readiness Guide obtained by MacRumors states that ATLAS online training and learning resources for servicing the iMac Pro have been available in English since December. We also spoke to multiple sources who completed the course and received certification months ago.
The guide adds that iMac Pro service parts availability began in early to mid January, with replacement logic boards, flash storage, and memory available by late February. Multiple sources at Apple Authorized Service Providers also confirmed that iMac Pro displays are available with two-week-or-less delivery estimates.
MacRumors contacted a reliable source who confirmed that Apple Authorized Service Providers are permitted to deny service for any product that has been opened or modified by a customer, regardless of warranty, both for safety reasons and to avoid responsibility if the machine cannot be fixed.
In the end, Apple has to draw a line somewhere, and not everyone will agree with it. MacRumors contacted Apple, but a spokesperson declined to comment. We've also contacted Linus Tech Tips for comment.
Article Link: Popular YouTuber Says Apple Won't Fix His iMac Pro, But Disassembly Violated Apple's Repair Policy
Apple Marketing will be losing their minds.
This is supposed to be sold to enterprise....all of whom are now aware that they can be told "can't fix won't fix" on a brand new $6,000 computer.
Truly. This is beyond ignorance. Corporate people are too usage needy to go in a-fixin'. They need production now so they're more likely to keep duplicate hardware on site or buy something to hold them over until repairs can be completed.Corporate users won't be ripping it apart like this idiot did, big difference.
Currently I think none, but that's the point. As far as I understand there are 17 states which are currently discussing introducing "right to repair" laws which would require device makers to provide tools, parts and service/repair manuals to third parties.What law says Apple must repair something out of warranty, or if they won’t repair it that they must provide someone else parts?
Because the article doesn't make that immediately clear. I took the time to read it and was a little annoyed how long it took to get that answer. Really could've said it all within two sentences.What is it with everyone failing to understand that he is not expecting to get this repaired under warranty and fully upfront with his asking to pay for the repair himself?
"Everyone could do it" sounds facetious. Certainly a lot of people could. It is not difficult to find people who qualify for short courses and at most vocational/tech college courses, who can then receive training to know how to repair these things. They are intricate, but replacing the replaceable parts are grossly simple.If it were that easy, everybody could do it. Personally, I don't blame them for staying away from this one.
Can you give some concrete examples then? All my visits to dealership service counters only required me to specify the part number and quantity. Had auto-manual tranny swaps done as my biggest parts-related work. Never even needed my VIN. In my mind, a sale is a sale. No one cared if I actually had the matching car.Not always.
I hate being pedantic, but prima donna is the term you're looking for.Linus is a pre-Madonna and doesn't deserve to have his iMac Pro repaired after he broke it.