Dude, a small company with an unexpected explosion in orders will go through these bumps.
I am so shocked that people do not understand that. I don't think anyone of us in their position could have done better. They received more orders in a month than they got the entire time they were making cases for the ipad 1. WHILE still selling the iPad 1 and iPhone 4 products.
That is incredible guys, can't you give them props for that at least! It is so easy to run a business like Portenzo making handmade products from the MacRumors: Forms. But imagine if you were them...think about Darin who also has a day job that got this big fat baby laid on his doorstep.
Yes, Portenzo did mess up but they are trying to make it right. Now if people will just LET them make it right.
When these issues originally surfaced, I was one of Portenzo's biggest supporters and took a lot of heat from naysayers for being just that. And I agree with you that in general, everyone can't be pleased in this situation and that there will be complaints regardless what Portenzo does. That said, I will reiterate my current thoughts about this situation--I don't believe Portenzo has done a good job communicating with it's customers and most information that they have provided has proven to be inaccurate. FOR ME, a good job communicating would have meant:
1) a notice on their website that explained that they were experiencing shipping delays and were doing the best they could to rectify the situation
2) an email to customers who were waiting longer than posted wait times to have their order fulfilled, again explaining the situation, asking for patience, and providing customer options.
3) providing accurate information about shipping times, etc.
In my opinion, none of that has been done. Posting on FB, twitter, and Macrumors cannot replace posting information on their own website. People don't want to have to chase down information from a company that is providing a product for a fee. That company should make information easily accessible and readily available. In general, many of us are happy to wait for however long it takes, because many of us believe that Portenzo offers the best quality available. But, we're also looking for an accurate picture of when we can expect our product.
To offer a few other examples, I've recently ordered two other bags from companies that make handmade and exceptional products. In both cases, I was given a delivery window of well over a month. Now, while I'd love to have these items in hand sooner, I placed my order having an ACCURATE expectation of when it would be delivered. And I'm willing to wait the month(s) that it will take to have my product in hand, knowing that I'm paying for a quality handmade item. But those companies, unlike Portenzo, didn't create a false expectation that I would have my product in 2 or 3 weeks. They told me what to expect (even when their timeline is 6 weeks or longer) and will stand by the dates that they promised. I feel no need to email them or bother them further until after the 4, 6, 8 or whatever week wait time.
I don't think the folks at Portenzo are crooks and I strongly believe, as you do, that their intentions are good and that they are experiencing "growing pains". But I also believe there are some simple measures that they could have taken that would have made this situation a million times better both for themselves and for their customers.
I am still waiting for my case and will continue to do so. I look forward to having what I believe will be a great quality product. But I remain disappointed that Portenzo has failed to deal with the situation in a better manner. It gives the impression of disorganization and confusion, which concerns me for many reasons (not only in receiving my case, but also in addressing any future issues, concerns, etc.).
Anyway, I've tried to be a voice of reason too many times on this thread--first to calm those who were complaining when Portenzo was only two days late shipping and now to help some understand why many are upset or disappointed with what is happening. Not sure that reason works in this environment, but I'll put it out there anyway.