What else were you expecting that they would put on a phone?
I mean, it's a phone, after all, right? Based on the thickness/form-factor of the iPhone, it doesn't make a lot of sense to have a much better camera (megapixel-wise) than the one they will now provide with the 3Gs. Better pics would require better optics, and you cannot fit better optics in that thin case. You would also require a flash, which leads to the same spacing/form-factor problem and a new one: battery.
On the other hand, a front-facing camera for videoconferencing is something many people dream about because they've never had it (especially in the US). They see this as a sign of technical achievement and as a futuristic feature. In fact, as I'm sure many here know, this is a some-years-old feature that people don't really use that much. I've had 4 video-phones and I have probably made 4 video-calls in my whole life, each time, just testing the quality. Granted, it would be interesting to have video-calling within iChat or Skype, using only data and not a cellular video-call, but this would require Apple stop listening to AT&T and granting every wish they have.
So what other "Pro" feature are you expecting to see that would justify pissing all the 3Gs buyers off?
And Steve? I really believe that they're purposely separating the ancient Apple/Jobs indivisible unit...
