No DDR support on the 7457, last I heard, but like you say it will support a faster (200 MHz) bus.Originally posted by vniow
200Mhz bus, low power consumption and DDR support are just a few of the things I can think of from the top of my head, you know, stuff that was cool last year..
Originally posted by crenz
Anybody care to expand on the probably performance differences between a 7457 12" PowerBook and the current G4?
Originally posted by WM.
...
I have to say, I don't understand this whole thing about "fake" DDR vs. "real" DDR. DDR simply means that data is transmitted on both edges of the clock signal. The bus between the CPU and the system controller (U2 or Intrepid) doesn't support DDR. The bus between the controller and RAM does. Why do we have to use loaded adjectives like "fake" to describe this?
WM
Originally posted by WM.
I have to say, I don't understand this whole thing about "fake" DDR vs. "real" DDR. DDR simply means that data is transmitted on both edges of the clock signal. The bus between the CPU and the system controller (U2 or Intrepid) doesn't support DDR. The bus between the controller and RAM does. Why do we have to use loaded adjectives like "fake" to describe this?
WM
Originally posted by bluecell
Maybe it's just me, but I think another G4 PowerBook, no matter how much Motorola updates it, will be a huge disappointment. I've already ordered a dual G5 PowerMac and I don't think I could bring myself to purchase another G4. I'd rather just hang on to my 17" PowerBook and wait until a 64-bit version comes out. God knows I'm a patient man.
Yeah, it is superior to the Intel and AMD mobile chips because the PowerPCs aren't scaled down. However, I personally like having nearly the same performance in my notebook as I have in my desktop. I might be spoiled, but I know that I'm not the only person who feels like dropping money on another G4 update would be extremely painfull. I'll wait.Originally posted by elo
Why do you say that? From where I sit, the G4 is an outstanding chip for laptops, generally comparable to the Pentium M and superior to everything else currently used in notebook computers from any manufacturer.
Besides, there is no evidence that the current G5 would even be as good as the G4 in critical areas such as battery life (the one area where the Pentium M trounces even the G4) or heat dissipation.
Personally, I would be very happy to see a G4 PowerBook with the indicated speeds. What else out there could beat it?
elo
Originally posted by bluecell
Maybe it's just me, but I think another G4 PowerBook, no matter how much Motorola updates it, will be a huge disappointment. I've already ordered a dual G5 PowerMac and I don't think I could bring myself to purchase another G4. I'd rather just hang on to my 17" PowerBook and wait until a 64-bit version comes out. God knows I'm a patient man.
Meaning that I won't even think about another PowerBook update until it gets a new processor. And yes, I update pretty regularly. But I'm not a multi-millionaire.Originally posted by jxyama
k, no personal attack intended, but hang on to your 17"??? you've had it for how long? <4 months?
technology moves quickly, but surely, you don't think 17" is so out of date that you'd describe owning it as "hanging on"?
(of course, i presumed you have as much $$$ as most of us, i.e. buying a computer every few years, perhaps. if you happen to be a multi-millionaire, i apologize. 😀 )
According to https://buyersguide.macrumors.com// iBook was last update on April 22, 2003.Does anyone recall when the iBooks were last updated?
Originally posted by chomsky
Personally, I'm more concerned about the video chipset upgrade than the CPU upgrade. I want a 128mb radeon 9600 in my "17 powerbook....
Originally posted by macphoria
Would this happen?
12" PowerBook - G4 1.1GHz
15" PowerBook - G4 1.2GHz
17" PowerBook - G4 1.3Ghz
And once 12" PowerBook goes over 1Ghz mark, does that mean we can expect 1GHz G3 iBook?
Originally posted by Macrumors
Speeds are expected to be 1.1, 1.25 and 1.33 GHz with USB 2.0 and Firewire 800 throughout the entire line.