MrSugar said:I hate making comments about powerbooks, but I had to open this one up. This is nutty, the Xserve has a 90nm g5 and it's a 1U rackmount (1.75" or close) closure. Powerbooks will be able to run on a 90nm chip process, there is no question about this. It's just all the engineering BS that is probably taking a long time.
on to my post:
I don't understand how apple could have a Pmac that is already working and get so many more issues from it by introducing a new, smaller, less heat producing chip? I mean even if it's outside of the processor they already have all of those parts working and cooling, what huge problems could bring on delays like this?! I just don't understand!
Not PCI-XGaffa Bug said:I agree... seems like the PCI-X graphics cards are the hold up.
army_guy said:Not PCI-X
PCI-Express x16
Well could be, but ATI has allready finished the cards (native x16 PCI-Express), it might be because there isnt enough cards.
GigaWire said:There will be no updates until 3 GHz this summer. Remember, we no longer have a G4 processor here, so every incremental speed bump like before does not matter anymore. I would not be surprised by once a year powermac updates as a norm. Until they get stuck at 5 GHz for 3 years.
BenRoethig said:I would like to see this. I think it would be a great PR boost for Apple to be a early adopter of PCI-express.
lasuther said:If there is a problem with G5 PowerMacs overheating, a PowerBook G5 is going to be nuclear hot. Even at the lower GHz, its going to be very hot. We'll be lucky to have a G5 PowerBook by the end of the year that has more than a 1 hour battery life and doesn't burn you. But I do think it will be here for the holiday shopping season. I'll be waiting for a Rev B G5 PowerBook, and thats a long way off. Just my take on the situation.
lasuther
Naimfan said:I'd be surprised if PBs next revision came out with a G5, unless there are no revisions to the PB line until MWSF. That seems to be an untenable retail position. Combining Apple's statement that "It will be a while..." until the G5 goes into the PB, and the fact that PBs are due for some sort of update, isn't the most likely scenario an updated G4, with faster HD and a better graphics card? I understand the line of reasoning that says the 970FX is much cooler running than the 970, and is cooler than or equal to the G4, but there may well be other heat issues on the motherboard or elsewhere that make it difficult for Apple to engineer into a PB. Until Apple either comments on that or brings out new PBs we won't know.
I've said elsewhere that I'd buy a 15" 1.4/1.5 GHz G4 if it's priced around or below where it is now. As a student, I can buy the 15" 1.25 GHz for $2299, which strikes me as about right relative to the Wintel laptops I've seen (which are all hideous). The only thing stopping me from ordering one with the single 512 meg stick of RAM and the faster HD is that some sort of update seems imminent.....and my Pismo is still OK.
So the report of delays bums me out some, but not entirely. Better Apple get right whatever update is coming, than to rush them out complete with defects.
gorkonapple said:This is the problem. EVERYONE has been assuming that the 90nm part should run cooler then the earlier chip, yet I think that is assuming too much. Assuming this, then yes...Powerbook G5's may yet be close on the horizon....yet my bet is Apple wants a G5 Powerbook to be as fast as a desktop and quite possibly be the first EVER to bring out a dual processor laptop. This is DEFINITELY something Apple would LOVE to do as it's a virtual impossibility with PC hardware and close to that with the G5. Apple likes to Think Different and I as well as many others on the net have been hoping for a portable that works as fast as the desktop with no compromises. This includes the first ever portable SMP system.
clr900 said:If I have to wait more than one more month....I will implode. I want me new PM G5 now! 😱
I think we're "stuck" with the G5 for a long time, probably several years. Last I heard IBM was expecting the G5 to scale to at least 5 GHz, so that kills a lot of time for Apple if need be. Not that it's such a bad thing, if IBM can keep steadily ramping speeds and Apple can get the chips to work in an actual product.DrGruv1 said:they released the 970fx 8 months or more ahead of schedule, perhaps they have the 980 ready to go..
army_guy said:Yes ATI and that R420, they should be releasing it MARCH/APRIL with availability sometime in MAY for the OEMS and board manufacturers so Id say early MAY-JUNE for the desktop G5's
UofI MacConvert said:So I couldn't take it anymore. I figured that the 10 day period would cover me for updates this week and next but even if they dont come it is well worth it for me. I need a new laptop and could not wait to switch from the prison known as windows. I ordered a new 1.25 15" PB with 1 gig ram this morning along with a new blue ipod mini 😀 . I dont really need the extra power if an update comes and I got a great deal with the developer program too. It was great to see this rumor come out too, made my decision seem more reasonable. Now Apple really has a reason to update though, they have my $$ already. To all those that can wait, good luck with the waiting and rumor watching. To those that need one, just order one, if you dont need a G5 then there really is no reason to wait for the next update. Just my opinion. 😎
Stevo