Wasn't the guy who got his phone stolen working on the Antenna internally at Apple?
??

Regards
??
Regards
Really? Even a person trying to make an emergency call to any authorities?
Wow you're a genius. This phone is FAIL. Get used to it fanboi.![]()
Look, thousands of people on this site have reported problems with their IP4s, mostly people who have been on this board for years and are neither trolls nor fandroids. Literally, thousands...you can look back over their posting history to see that they aren't trolls. I mean, even Arn has reported the problem.
Is anybody else going to be really pissed if they release a new iPhone in September and charge people for it (even with a trade-in value)?
Literally, thousands? As in a minimum of 2,000 MacRumors forum members who have reported problems with their iPhone 4's?
I challenge you to make a poll to back up this contention.
but they're all designed the same. that's the only explanation for people getting 5 bars holding it upside down and any way they want while others are getting the reception issues. They're the same design so there has to be a manufacturing flaw
Again, like I told you before, this is explained by the fact that the problem is a 20 db drop in signal.
It very much depends on your initial signal. If you have -70 dbm, you're showing 5 bars. Holding the problem spot and losing 20 db means you're at -90 dbm and still showing 5 bars. If you start at -90 dbm, the 20 db drop puts you at -110 dbm, which is 1 bar.
This is why people say it's a design flaw, all units are affected, but depending on certain factors, you don't see it.
Honestly, you'd have to be stupid to expect your cell phone to survive multiple 4 or 5 feet drops to concrete or other hard material. They actually make rugged phones for that EXACT purpose. The iPhone is not one of them, and has never been advertised as such.No sane person expects their phone to withstand knife-cutting or a trip into the blender. People expect their phones to withstand occasional drops in real-life situations. It seems that again, the iPhone 4 fails the test.
Honestly, you'd have to be stupid to expect your cell phone to survive multiple 4 or 5 feet drops to concrete or other hard material. They actually make rugged phones for that EXACT purpose. The iPhone is not one of them, and has never been advertised as such.
So couldn't that be a conflict between software and hardware and potentially pinning it to a software error
Honestly, you'd have to be stupid to expect your cell phone to survive multiple 4 or 5 feet drops to concrete or other hard material. They actually make rugged phones for that EXACT purpose. The iPhone is not one of them, and has never been advertised as such.
By engineers, you must mean the engineers that Apple Inc's marketing and PR team trusts. Obviously, all the radio engineers' opinion - who claim that this whole issue is about a ridiculous design mistake - don't matter.
The most likely TRUTH is 1 or 2 bad batches which can easily be identified by serial numbers. Why 98% of IP4 users are reporting NO issues?![]()
Again, like I told you before, this is explained by the fact that the problem is a 20 db drop in signal.
It very much depends on your initial signal. If you have -70 dbm, you're showing 5 bars. Holding the problem spot and losing 20 db means you're at -90 dbm and still showing 5 bars. If you start at -90 dbm, the 20 db drop puts you at -110 dbm, which is 1 bar.
This is why people say it's a design flaw, all units are affected, but depending on certain factors, you don't see it.
98%? Where do you get that figure from?
Honestly, you'd have to be stupid to expect your cell phone to survive multiple 4 or 5 feet drops to concrete or other hard material.
How do you know all units are affected? How do we know all units drop 20 DB when held in a certain manner?
There have been plenty on both sides of the issues. It is actually only the engineers at Apple that really matter because there has not been a single engineer outside of Apple that has performed a test using a methodology any type of engineer would call reliable.
Because no one ever posted evidence to show the contrary and with the description of the problem and what is known about the design of the phone, it very much points to a design flaw.
I never said I know all units are affected, I said evidence points to all units being affected.
If you have new evidence to submit, please do so.
@kernkraft
The fact that the glass on some iP4s cracks easily is a simple oversight by Apple Inc. See when the crates arrive from China Stevo jumps in his souped-up Prius, drives down to the docks, takes out his magic wand and applies his "woo woo" to them. Some crates must have slipped by Stevo that's all. Same with the "reception issue".
Look, thousands of people on this site have reported problems with their IP4s, mostly people who have been on this board for years and are neither trolls nor fandroids. Literally, thousands...you can look back over their posting history to see that they aren't trolls. I mean, even Arn has reported the problem.
Literally, thousands? As in a minimum of 2,000 MacRumors forum members who have reported problems with their iPhone 4's?
I challenge you to make a poll to back up this contention.
"Thousands" means more than a thousand, not more than 2000.
I don't think it's been more than a thousand individual posters, though.