Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If Apple lost they wouldn’t care. They had to file an objection to protect the mark. Win or lose, by doing so they met their obligation.
If they lose, that opens the doors to other companies attempting infringement in all kinds of ways too. They cared which is probably why they settled rather than risk a loss in court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ddtmm
If they lose, that opens the doors to other companies attempting infringement in all kinds of ways too. They cared which is probably why they settled rather than risk a loss in court.
No, that’s not how it works. It was a trademark opposition. It doesn’t set any kind of precedent. It’s not a lawsuit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
You got to be ****ing kidding me. All the wasted legal fees (on both sides) just for this? Only people that won here are the attorneys.

IP protection is an industry and there are people paid a lot of money to do it. brand protection is important to businesses and if you have people hired to do it, they're going to do their job. this is the cost of doing business. corporate lawyers exist for a reason.

your opinion on this being a waste is pure irrelevance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is an apple logo on an app in the Google play store that I saw when I was seeing what comes up there when I search for Apple News. I think it belongs to a Hong Kong based company. It even has a bite taken out. The app is called Apple Daily. How did Apple's lawyers miss this? It even comes up as a result of searching for Apple News.

SmartSelect_20210209-191247_Google Play Store.jpg
 
I don't see the bite in it. Apple just made a small company trying to survive waste money in attorney fees. Ridiculous!
LMAO you're ridiculous. Pear knew exactly what they were doing to drum up business just like those Chinese Apple store knockoffs. Stop defending these silly little businesses just because Apple is a giant. These small companies have to follow laws like everyone else.
 
There is an apple logo on an app in the Google play store that I saw when I was seeing what comes up there when I search for Apple News. I think it belongs to a Hong Kong based company. It even has a bite taken out. The app is called Apple Daily. How did Apple's lawyers miss this? It even comes up as a result of searching for Apple News.

View attachment 1727819

Macrumors logo also is an Apple. Doesn’t look anything like apple’s logo, and doesn’t look like a different logo in the same family as apple’s logo (it has a completely different aesthetic.)
 
If you were in charge of IP for a $2T company, wouldn’t you defend it like a mama bear protecting her cubs? Yes you would, or you wouldn’t have that job in the first place. They did exactly like they should have — protect the IP, no matter how small, no matter how seemingly harmless.
 
Old logo definitely looks better, but hard to explain why: the new leaf looks like a mouth that’s frowning or like the pear sprouted a letter “D” that is slightly too bold. What a shame to change it - the original was actually pretty good. I’d love to hear Apple’s full argument for opposing this...
 


Prepear, a recipe and meal-planning app, has agreed to change its pear logo to settle an ongoing trademark dispute with Apple, Prepear's co-founder today confirmed to iPhone in Canada. Apple in August opposed Prepear's trademark application, claiming that the company's pear-shaped logo was too similar to Apple's own logo.

prepear-logo-changes.jpg

Image via iPhone in Canada

Though Prepear's logo has a pear shape instead of an Apple shape, Apple seems to have taken offense to the right angle of Prepear's leaf in the original logo. The new logo features a leaf that's angled differently, a small change that Apple apparently feels makes it different enough from the famous Apple logo. Prepear's app icon has also been tweaked.

prepear-app-logo-changes.jpg

Following the initial trademark opposition, Super Healthy Kids, Prepear's parent company, launched a petition in an attempt to persuade Apple to drop its opposition targeting a small business that was trying to protect its logo, and that petition gained over 250,000 signatures. Apple was also widely derided by media sites and fans for going after Prepear's logo.

Back in December, filings with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board requested that the trial proceedings be suspended for 30 days as Prepear and Apple were "actively engaged in negotiations for the settlement" of the matter.

Prepear's CEO says that the trademark issue has now been "amicably resolved" and that Prepear is happy with the outcome.

Article Link: Prepear Changes Pear Logo to Settle Trademark Dispute With Apple

Grow a pear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jlc1978
This reminds me of the time my boyfriend threw a tantrum because I bought Sunkist orange soda instead of Fanta orange soda and made go back to the store and get the correct one. Same energy.
Unfortunately for her, Sunkist is actually the correct one.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.