Nobody, including Apple, said that the pear logo “infringed” on apple’s logo.
So why did Apple oppose their trademark application?
Nobody, including Apple, said that the pear logo “infringed” on apple’s logo.
Sunkist is so much better, and it has caffeine.This reminds me of the time my boyfriend threw a tantrum because I bought Sunkist orange soda instead of Fanta orange soda and made go back to the store and get the correct one. Same energy.
So why did Apple oppose their trademark application?
Because the proposed trademark would allegedly have diluted Apple’s mark.
They taste very different, so if you bought a two liter, you are basically saying “here, drink something you don’t like for a week because it’s not for me and therefor your preferences aren’t important.”This reminds me of the time my boyfriend threw a tantrum because I bought Sunkist orange soda instead of Fanta orange soda and made go back to the store and get the correct one. Same energy.
Ok, I corrected my statment as it apparently had legal implications which you obviously took issue with. My point stands though.
"If that pear dilutes Apple's trademark in any way, every logo on earth is probably diluting trademark of something else. B.S."
That said, the lawsuit brought them both a ton of attention, largely negative for Apple and positive for Prepear. So it all works out in the end![]()
Whoa! That pear is diluting Apple's logo. Change the shape of that leaf!
My Nike watch doesn’t seem to work on the Verizon network anyway, at least according to Spectrum Mobile compatibility checker.Oh come on, you wanna see something that's actually too similar and would actually have some merit?
View attachment 1727905
If that pear dilutes Apple's trademark in any way, every logo on earth is probably diluting trademark of something else. B.S.
How did they bully them? They merely objected to the proposed trademark application. The reason the proposed applications are published is specifically so that anyone with an existing mark that thinks may be infringed or diluted can file an objection. It‘s then up to the trademark office to decide if there is an issue.
That‘s “bullying?”
Yes they were bullied, they tried to fight it, however they ended up caving, see how they tried to do so via petitions:
"Following the initial trademark opposition, Super Healthy Kids, Prepear's parent company, launched a petition in an attempt to persuade Apple to drop its opposition targeting a small business that was trying to protect its logo, and that petition gained over 250,000 signatures. Apple was also widely derided by media sites and fans for going after Prepear's logo."
To be fair, they are a $2T wielding their enormous wealth and power to go after...a food blogging company for a logo that just doesn't compear (sorry) to Apples. It's apples to pears. But Apple fans gotta Apple fan because psychology. Actually, at least psychology can have reason.
That said, the lawsuit brought them both a ton of attention, largely negative for Apple and positive for Prepear. So it all works out in the end![]()
No, I incorrectly suggested a dispute was a lawsuit. Like trifiid's, my point still stands, and Apple's predatory. But disqualify a statement on a slight misuse of legal wording. Like prosecutors who win on trivialities and technicalities because of judges in the pocket of large companies that favor them.There was no lawsuit. Your entire premise is wrong.
If the trademark office didn’t think that apple’s opposition had merit, they wouldn’t have had to beg apple to drop the opposition. Still not bullying. apple literally filed a form. They didn’t sue. They didn’t demand money. They didn’t leave nasty phone messages. They simply submitted a form and were prepared to abide by whatever the trademark office decided. They aren’t even involved after the point where they file the form - it’s up to the trademark office and prepear to work it out.
If you think that’s bullying, you must find the world a horribly scary place.
yeah:"All works out in the end"?
So, taking the bash-anything-Apple-side for a sec, you think Prepear's legal fees all worked out in the end?
Talk about reason.![]()
hes a douche for thatThis reminds me of the time my boyfriend threw a tantrum because I bought Sunkist orange soda instead of Fanta orange soda and made go back to the store and get the correct one. Same energy.
And a graphic designerYou got to be ****ing kidding me. All the wasted legal fees (on both sides) just for this? Only people that won here are the attorneys.
No, I incorrectly suggested a dispute was a lawsuit. Like trifiid's, my point still stands, and Apple's predatory. But disqualify a statement on a slight misuse of legal wording. Like prosecutors who win on trivialities and technicalities because of judges in the pocket of large companies that favor them.
Btw, thanks for selectively choosing one error in my post and missing the premise entirely
Whoa. You really want to be right on this. Fine you destroyed my faulty premise.Yes evil Apple filing a form so that twelve forum posters think badly of Apple and well of prepear.
Now go ask 100 random people on the street what they think of the situation, and I guarantee that not a one will have any idea what you are talking about.
There. Do you now agree that your faulty premise was destroyed?
yeah:
![]()
Apple Sues Small Business With Pear Logo Because 'People Can Get Confused' | Entrepreneur
Users are furious at Apple's attitude toward the five-employee company.www.entrepreneur.com
They got great publicity.