Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Security, almost certainly, because obviously the chips can still handle it.
If it is for security reasons they would have to drop pdf-support as well as pdf allows for embedded scripts for example for form validation.
 
I'm sorry but I think you're trolling here and I won't reply any more.
Honestly not. I'd be very interested to know why PDFs can't be drop-in replacements. I've done this countless times in InDesign, with all kinds of layer effects applied.

Whenever I've discussed EPS on the Adobe forums, staff members have said "you should be moving to PDF".
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and Tagbert
Random, but the "search" option on preview now is EXTREMELY slow, showing the dreaded beach ball, on my new Macbook Air. Is there a fix to this?
 
I can't really disagree with this. Uncommon formats shouldn't be supported by daily-use apps. They're an edge for security vulnerabilities that just doesn't need to be there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
I wonder if any of this is because of Adobes following move:

Adobe will disable support for authoring with Type 1 fonts by January 2023

Overview​

Type 1 fonts, also known as PostScript, PS1, T1, Adobe Type 1, Multiple Master, or MM are a format within the font industry that has been replaced by larger glyph sets.
Type 1 fonts were introduced by Adobe in 1984 for use with its PostScript page description language, and became widely used with the spread of desktop publishing software and printers that could use PostScript. In 1996, Adobe products and type development began to concentrate on the use of more versatile OpenType fonts rather than Type 1.
Most browsers and mobile OSes do not support Type 1 fonts. Similarly to Adobe, most operating systems will move forward with support for the more robust technical possibilities of OpenType format fonts, ending support for the Type 1 format.
 
I can't really disagree with this. Uncommon formats shouldn't be supported by daily-use apps. They're an edge for security vulnerabilities that just doesn't need to be there.
Maybe so, but EPS is not an uncommon format. It might be uncommon for those not working in design and graphics industries, but EPS is really quite common. Heck, even I as a non-designer used EPS when some years ago I had time and liked to design for others flyers and other printed materials (non-monetary).
 
Ugh. As an old Unix guy I rely on Preview when using LaTex and other tools that generate postscript files. It was great to tap space in Finder and get instant previews. Please change your mind Apple.
Why not use MacTeX, with its TeXShop editor, which automatically compiles LaTeX source files into pdf? The old workflow of .tex -> .dvi -> .ps/.eps -> .pdf is outmoded.
 
Instead of lifting iOS to the level of macOS, they continue to bring the macOS level down to iOS/iPadOS.
Yeah, also a way to compensate the inabilities of iOS/iPadOS.
This is bound to happen with people wanting touchscreen Macs. This way they can make macOS compatible with touchscreen devices like the iPad.
 
Please - everyone - submit feedback on this.


Tell them to stop!
I think this helps a little bit, but what they’re probably most likely going by is actual usage. All those people who allow usage statistics are deciding what is important and what is not important for macOS. If features don’t get used ever then they become irrelevant.

Apple can’t go by people submitting feedback, because sometimes a small minority of users can be really vocal about something. Usage statistics shows what people actually need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn
FYI - it has been mentioned elsewhere that /usr/bin/pstopdf still exists and can convert PostScript to PDF
pstopdf(1) General Commands Manual

NAME
pstopdf – convert PostScript input into a PDF document.

SYNOPSIS

pstopdf [inputfile] [-o outname] [-l] [-p]

DESCRIPTION

pstopdf is a tool to convert PostScript input data into a PDF document. The input data may come from a file or may be read from stdin. The PDF document is always written to a file. The name of the output PDF file is derived from the name of the input file or may be explicitly named using the -o option.

Flags:
-o outname
The name of the output file to create. If an explicit file name is not supplied, the output file will be created in the current directory and named foo.pdf for an input file named foo.ps

-l Specifies that any messages generated during file conversion be written to a log file. For an output file named foo.pdf the generated log file is foo.pdf.log rather than generated to stdout. If there are no messages, the log file is not generated.

-p Generates a simple progress message to stdout at the end of each page. Because conversion of complex or lengthy PostScript input can take time, it is sometimes useful to see that progress is being made. Progress messages are always written to stdout even when the -l (log file) option is specified.

EXAMPLES
pstopdf inputfile.ps Creates a PDF file named inputfile.pdf from the PostScript data in the input file inputfile.ps
pstopdf -o outputfilename Creates a PDF file named outputfilename from the PostScript data read from stdin.

Apple Computer, Inc.
 
  • Love
Reactions: apple2me and chabig
According to Microsoft:

This change was done in response to active security incidents involving files. EPS files allow embedded scripts, which makes them a means of malicious attack for anyone who inserts an EPS file or opens a document that has an EPS file in it. In spite of previous efforts to mitigate the problem in Office documents, the EPS format continues to be a source of malicious attacks. To completely eliminate the risk of EPS files containing malicious code, Office decided to entirely turn off the ability to insert them.
 
This is a shock! I am dealing with them all the time, including making them and viewing them with Preview. Anyone who designs for printing, publishing etc. use EPS for logos, artwork etc. Windows has always had bugs with EPS and PS documents but if you are using a Mac no issues. Now the tables have turned.

This complicates moving to Ventura for anyone in the publishing field. Want to check in Finder which EPS document to send? Have to start Adobe/Affinity just to look at each one! Not cool and a huge waste of time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tYNS
As a non-designer, I'm genuinely curious why a PDF couldn't be used where you currently use an EPS. What's so special about them?
I'm sure someone else could explain it better then I, but I will give it a long winded shot (still shocked).

It is workflow related. When dealing with people that are not designers or don't know what they are doing, EPS is straight forward. It always is what it says it is. If I say send me a PDF of their logo, I could end up with them opening a version of their logo in Word and exporting that as a pixelated mess to PDF and then sending it. An EPS version of the logo (for this example) is infinity scalable (vector graphic) to any size and is built normally in Illustrator or Affinity Designer.

So in short, it causes major headaches and frustrations for those in this business. A client running macOS Ventura will not be able to even view which EPS file to send since, normally, they do not possess the programs needed to open it. That was what Preview and Finder was for.

I expect someone to put out some sort of free EPS Preview type of application in the future but it doesn't come built in like every Mac has always had. Plus, this industry does not move fast at all.

Edit: Just to add, if you are asked by a print shop to send your logo, they expect an EPS file. Without Preview, most clients wouldn't know which one to send. Or which file in the email, from years ago, is the correct file. So many simple things become complicated. I have experienced all of that with clients on Windows. Now it comes to the Mac.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: chabig
This is a shock! I am dealing with them all the time, including making them and viewing them with Preview. Anyone who designs for printing, publishing etc. use EPS for logos, artwork etc. Windows has always had bugs with EPS and PS documents but if you are using a Mac no issues. Now the tables have turned.

This complicates moving to Ventura for anyone in the publishing field. Want to check in Finder which EPS document to send? Have to start Adobe/Affinity just to look at each one! Not cool and a huge waste of time.
Graphic Converter is an amazing App. It will open PS & EPS files so you can work with them easily & convert them to whatever you need. It’s inexpensive, reliable and gets regular updates… I don’t work for them, but this App is fantastic.
 
It is workflow related. When dealing with people that are not designers or don't know what they are doing, EPS is straight forward. It always is what it says it is. If I say send me a PDF of their logo, I could end up with them opening a version of their logo in Word and exporting that as a pixelated mess to PDF and then sending it. An EPS version of the logo (for this example) is infinity scalable (vector graphic) to any size and is built normally in Illustrator or Affinity Designer.
"Oh, he's asking for an EPS. I'll just convert this JPEG to EPS in Photoshop...." :lol: Never underestimate a client's ability to send you the wrong thing, whatever the format.

I expect someone to put out some sort of free EPS Preview type of application in the future but it doesn't come built in like every Mac has always had. Plus, this industry does not move fast at all.
I did post a link on page 4 to a free QuickLook and viewer app that's been created by a very clever guy.
 
A bit of a sidetrack here, but .AI files are .PS in nature, aren't they? Well, it's been a really, really long time since I used Adobe Illustrator; close to a decade, I think. Eep! But, I somehow recall that .ai files can be read as postscript files because that's what they are?
Adobe made the transition from PS based files to PDF based files in illustrator 10 if I'm not mistaken.
Not that that's relevant imo: if you download a file, your web browser shouldn't decide to add another extension, especially not if the result is that you have to manually strip it before you can use said file...
 
This is a shock! I am dealing with them all the time, including making them and viewing them with Preview. Anyone who designs for printing, publishing etc. use EPS for logos, artwork etc. Windows has always had bugs with EPS and PS documents but if you are using a Mac no issues. Now the tables have turned.

This complicates moving to Ventura for anyone in the publishing field. Want to check in Finder which EPS document to send? Have to start Adobe/Affinity just to look at each one! Not cool and a huge waste of time.
@benwiggy earlier mentioned the EPSview app that will let you view and preview EPS files. that might be a useful tool for your needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacHeritage
Thank you @benwiggy ! That will help a lot of people, once it comes time to upgrade.

"Oh, he's asking for an EPS. I'll just convert this JPEG to EPS in Photoshop...." :lol: Never underestimate a client's ability to send you the wrong thing, whatever the format.
LOL, yes, I am aware! But for most, that I deal with, they don't have anything that could make an EPS file, so it is an easier format compared to PDF when dealing with people that don't know.

And I totally forgot about all the vector files that I purchase are all in EPS.
 
they don't have anything that could make an EPS file
You're right that it's never been a 'consumer' format. Apple's decision leaves it much as it was in Classic Mac OS -- just a file on your desktop that you can't open unless you've got the right app. But Professionals will continue to use it in Illustrator, InDesign, Quark, Affinity, as they've always done.

PDF was always designed as a replacement for PostScript. Printers now interpret PDF directly; prepress workflows go from PDF to plate; CUPS uses PDF as its default job file format; Type 1 fonts are now unsupported. EPS files are, or will be, the last remnant of PostScript in use. What their future will be: who knows?
 
This is a shock! I am dealing with them all the time, including making them and viewing them with Preview. Anyone who designs for printing, publishing etc. use EPS for logos, artwork etc. Windows has always had bugs with EPS and PS documents but if you are using a Mac no issues. Now the tables have turned.

This complicates moving to Ventura for anyone in the publishing field. Want to check in Finder which EPS document to send? Have to start Adobe/Affinity just to look at each one! Not cool and a huge waste of time.
I wonder if an option is to keep a copy of pre-Ventura Preview and install a copy after upgrading to Ventura.

I think I did that with QuickTime. There older version could read some formats and do certain kinds of edits that the new one couldn’t.
 
This is insanity considering the Mac is literally the defacto machine in the publishing industry. EPS is synonymous in daily graphic assets. Each release of Mac hardware and software makes me want to go to windows more. I have no idea how anyone thinks at Apple anymore. Product line is an convoluted over priced mess plagued with hardware flaws, non-upgradeability and glue making huge amounts of e-waste.. Each operating system and software upgrade (or lack there of) is becoming more bubblegum to serve the teen crowd. They better watch their steps, being a 30+ year Mac user, I am personally reaching my limits. it has been 11 years of dismantling the incredible catalogue Jobs created in his just over 13-14 years of restoring apple. We have an apple built on maximizing profits now, not building the tools to help people. What was the last piece of software apple actually made that turned heads...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.