Most people I know own a 55-65" 1080p TV and view it from about 8 feet away, a distance from which that resolution can be appreciated. Bump it up to 4K and we'd have to either reduce the viewing distance by half, or increase the screen size to 140"+.
It appears you didn't understand my post against taking "the chart" at face value. You might want to re-read it. For all I know "the chart" may be perfectly valid. The point was that if it supported the pre-

TV 3 arguments against 1080p, why wasn't it used to bash Apple as being stupid for embracing 1080p in the "3"? Instead, it got retired for a few years as all of the anti-1080p crowd pre-

TV3 embraced the new "3" fresh out of Apple.
Now, you've resurrected the chart again- updated with new numbers on the very same chart- making the very same arguments against 4K because Apple doesn't sell a 4K

TV. Will you be back after Apple rolls out this fifth generation "now with 4K" to bash Apple per this very same chart for being so stupid to embrace a resolution that "no one" can see?
That's the point.
Virtually every movie and TV show has been available for streaming in 1080p over prevailing internet connection speeds for years.
OK, but before there was an

TV3 "now with 1080p" how much 1080p

TV content was available for sale in the iTunes store? If you don't know, the answer is EXACTLY the same as the answer to how much 4K

TV content is available in the iTunes store before there is a 4K

TV. Hardware must come first; else not $1 can be made if EVERYTHING in the iTunes store was available in 4K for an

TV that is not yet in one person's home.