Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I am not disagreeing. But calling the battery pack “reverse charging” simply because it charges a phone and can SSO charge AirPods does not make sense. That is just having to coils in the batter pack.

Reverse charging - at least as presented in other rumors there the iPhone would support it would be for the phone’s coil to receive power to charge from a Qi charger (cord or battery pack) And also to allow the phone’s coil to send power to charge the AirPods.

this battery pack does not play into it.
Yep... fully agree.
 
What is an "iWatch"?
2AC20222-EEA2-4778-B042-5000B73D469D.jpeg


Apparently something for sale from both Best Buy and Amazon, lol.
 
Because they don't. Prosser is more accurate than Kuo. Gurman is in his own league. Everyone else is playing for 2nd and they have plenty of their own leaks that Mark doesn't get.

Gurman is not in another league. He access to Bloomberg analytical data from thousands of sources, can interview main staff at Apple and most like has weekly calls or VM some of course not watched. I don’t call that a prognacature of rumours like Prosser that receives leaks. Gurman also reads a lot of what’s talked about in forums and has many times before been caught mentioning a rumour that was a topic of conversation right here an macrumors forums first.

analyst, column video person yes, rumour or leaker no.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.