Also, it seems that companies in USA can operate above the law. Idk how.
Proton is Swiss.
Also, it seems that companies in USA can operate above the law. Idk how.
It's refreshing to hear a dev call it like it is. Apple has the right to do this, and devs have the right to reject it. I personally think 30% is more than fair but not the way Apple selectively enforces it, so I hope the devs win something out of this.They are judge, jury, and executioner on their platform, and you can take it or leave it. You can't get any sort of fair hearing to determine whether it's justifiable or not justifiable, anything they say goes.
Oh they agreed, begrudgingly.Sorry but just like ALL Developers who post Apps to the platform, Proton agreed to the terms and conditions when they signed up for their Developer account and submitted their app for distribution.
These terms and conditions are CLEARLY defined and are identical for ALL developers.
If Proton does‘t like it, too bad! Maybe they should pay more attention the contracts they agreed to and properly plan their app development!
Those guidelines don't state all the rules, not even the juicy parts, like the one about only having to pay 15% under certain very specific conditions that basically only Amazon currently meets. Some rules I've only heard from the reviewers and can't find anywhere else.Dear MacRumors, if you could please post Apple App Store guidelines. Clearly the average reader doesn’t know or understand the rules - https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#payments
At some point, they are the law. Amazon gets tax credits to set up shop in whatever state offers the best deal. They paid 0 federal income tax in 2018 and possibly other years.Also, it seems that companies in USA can operate above the law. Idk how.
It depends what kind of app you develop.Be a developer, then try taking that stance again.
Current state of being an iOS developer is rich. We have it good. Yen is greedy and wants more. It's as simple as that.
any app. app store is more than fair. well maybe porn apps aren't.It depends what kind of app you develop.
There is a pattern that the “icritics” will criticize Apple like there is no tomorrow. Apple is not operating above the law, as your “opinion” postulates.Just like every other news articles discussing similar issues, iSheep will defend Apple like no tomorrow and developers are evil because they “want a free ride of some sort”. If developers are all evil, why download any third party apps at all?
Also, it seems that companies in USA can operate above the law. Idk how.
Add to that creating and popularizing the whole damn platform and ecosystem in the first place.So, Yen wants Apple to provide distribution, promotion, hosting/CDN, dev tools, etc for his app but he wants it all for free, while monetizing the app outside the store?
Ok then, sure, no problem.
What hypocrisy?The hypocrisy is astounding on Apple's part.
Businesses generally don’t treat all customers equal and that applies to Apple. Apple has to change as business evolves and creates classes of customers that get treated equally.They don't hold all developers to the same standard. Yen is absolutely correct that apps that gain traction are suddenly met with increased interest from Apple, often resulting in the experiences he reported. Your point is an example of the end of the spectrum that Apple deals with: companies too big or that have resources to fight Apple will get better treatment. In short, Apple doesn't apply the App Store rules equally to all app developers.
On the flip side of this opinion, the fire will fizzle out. The wave will come and be washed out and go right back to sea. None of us are prescient.No matter what the Apple defenders believe, where there is smoke there's fire. A wave is coming and it will be very difficult for Apple to prevail.
They are using Apples IP to make money, distribute their apps, get technical help...no matter how the app was created. All for $99. Bargain.Indy devs are making iOS compatible apps, not using apples IP. When someone makes ford mustang compatible tires, they aren't using fords IP.
I thoroughly enjoy using Apple products, but I'm not beholden enough to any one tech company that I cannot see when they're in the wrong. Just like the Apple/Epic case, both sides are wrong for their actions.
Less fanboys and more level-headed thinkers is what we need in the world.
Those guidelines don't state all the rules, not even the juicy parts, like the one about only having to pay 15% under certain very specific conditions that basically only Amazon currently meets.
So it’s perfectly fine for Netflix, Spotify, Amazon, Uber etc. to do this bit not Proton Mail? How come they were allowed to exist this way on the App Store for several years?So, Yen wants Apple to provide distribution, promotion, hosting/CDN, dev tools, etc for his app but he wants it all for free, while monetizing the app outside the store?
Ok then, sure, no problem.
Most of the companies that are complaining are doing so because they equally apply the rule and therefore won't give them a special deal other companies don't get.
What rule is this? The same rule that Apple didn’t care about for 2 years?They knew the rules. If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
During the anti-trust hearing with congress Tim Cook said 84% of apps in the App Store are free. I’ll bet outside of games most people aren’t paying for a thing. They download the free app and put up with whatever ads are in the app. Why Apple wants to screw over indie developers who probably aren’t making a ton of money makes no sense to me. When Steve Jobs launched the App Store he told the WSJ that Apple wasn’t looking to make money off of it. Clearly that’s not the case now. When Tim Cook told Wall Street Apple would double services revenues this is one way they’re doing it - squeezing as much as they can out of indie developers.So everyone offers only free apps, Apple get no revenue from this, and devs make their money on outside purchases. Do you see a flaw here somewhere?
Apple has never allowed apps to advertise in the app that they could sign up outside of the app. The concept is that free apps get a free ride. If you bring your own customers that’s one thing, but if your success depends on Apple’s marketing building your business then you have to pay. Period. Keep in mind, there were no free apps when you had to get them from your carrier.Apple changed the rules, there was no problem for a few years, so calling them cry babies is unfair imo.
It’s definitely an issue if Apple think they can force companies who make money outside of the App Store to cut them a piece of the pie.
It's not binary, black and white and flip a switch. Apple treats it's developers equally within a class. Changing market conditions, business requirements etc sometimes take time to catch up to each other. However, it still appears Proton violated some app store guidelines....
What rule is this? The same rule that Apple didn’t care about for 2 years?
...