Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As proton mail user, we already acknowledge this, but proton is not so shiny mail provider, have less power, until Hey case spark, proton added those blog and expressing in app purchase frustration.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: XXPP
[goes to comment, reads thread, baaaaaacks aaaaaway slowly]
BD96B51E-95F8-4698-8F11-6EBB4CA2E9A9.gif
 
Sorry but just like ALL Developers who post Apps to the platform, Proton agreed to the terms and conditions when they signed up for their Developer account and submitted their app for distribution.

These terms and conditions are CLEARLY defined and are identical for ALL developers.
If Proton does‘t like it, too bad! Maybe they should pay more attention the contracts they agreed to and properly plan their app development!
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy and XXPP
They are judge, jury, and executioner on their platform, and you can take it or leave it. You can't get any sort of fair hearing to determine whether it's justifiable or not justifiable, anything they say goes.
It's refreshing to hear a dev call it like it is. Apple has the right to do this, and devs have the right to reject it. I personally think 30% is more than fair but not the way Apple selectively enforces it, so I hope the devs win something out of this.
[automerge]1602204218[/automerge]
Sorry but just like ALL Developers who post Apps to the platform, Proton agreed to the terms and conditions when they signed up for their Developer account and submitted their app for distribution.

These terms and conditions are CLEARLY defined and are identical for ALL developers.
If Proton does‘t like it, too bad! Maybe they should pay more attention the contracts they agreed to and properly plan their app development!
Oh they agreed, begrudgingly.
 
Last edited:
Dear MacRumors, if you could please post Apple App Store guidelines. Clearly the average reader doesn’t know or understand the rules - https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#payments
Those guidelines don't state all the rules, not even the juicy parts, like the one about only having to pay 15% under certain very specific conditions that basically only Amazon currently meets. Some rules I've only heard from the reviewers and can't find anywhere else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Just like every other news articles discussing similar issues, iSheep will defend Apple like no tomorrow and developers are evil because they “want a free ride of some sort”. If developers are all evil, why download any third party apps at all?

Also, it seems that companies in USA can operate above the law. Idk how.
There is a pattern that the “icritics” will criticize Apple like there is no tomorrow. Apple is not operating above the law, as your “opinion” postulates.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: sinoka56 and CarlJ
So, Yen wants Apple to provide distribution, promotion, hosting/CDN, dev tools, etc for his app but he wants it all for free, while monetizing the app outside the store?
Ok then, sure, no problem.
Add to that creating and popularizing the whole damn platform and ecosystem in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
The hypocrisy is astounding on Apple's part.
What hypocrisy?

They don't hold all developers to the same standard. Yen is absolutely correct that apps that gain traction are suddenly met with increased interest from Apple, often resulting in the experiences he reported. Your point is an example of the end of the spectrum that Apple deals with: companies too big or that have resources to fight Apple will get better treatment. In short, Apple doesn't apply the App Store rules equally to all app developers.
Businesses generally don’t treat all customers equal and that applies to Apple. Apple has to change as business evolves and creates classes of customers that get treated equally.

Take greedy Epic: lots of money to fight Apple. They got the royal treatment? Amirite? Or is it a perfect example of what $99 buys and apple treating them fairly?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sinoka56
I thoroughly enjoy using Apple products, but I'm not beholden enough to any one tech company that I cannot see when they're in the wrong. Just like the Apple/Epic case, both sides are wrong for their actions.

Less fanboys and more level-headed thinkers is what we need in the world.

Oh I get it. Anyone who disagrees with you and your beliefs is a fanboy and screw headed. Sounds about right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Those guidelines don't state all the rules, not even the juicy parts, like the one about only having to pay 15% under certain very specific conditions that basically only Amazon currently meets.


You're just blatantly making stuff up.
 
So, Yen wants Apple to provide distribution, promotion, hosting/CDN, dev tools, etc for his app but he wants it all for free, while monetizing the app outside the store?
Ok then, sure, no problem.
So it’s perfectly fine for Netflix, Spotify, Amazon, Uber etc. to do this bit not Proton Mail? How come they were allowed to exist this way on the App Store for several years?

Most of the companies that are complaining are doing so because they equally apply the rule and therefore won't give them a special deal other companies don't get.

They knew the rules. If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
What rule is this? The same rule that Apple didn’t care about for 2 years?

So everyone offers only free apps, Apple get no revenue from this, and devs make their money on outside purchases. Do you see a flaw here somewhere?
During the anti-trust hearing with congress Tim Cook said 84% of apps in the App Store are free. I’ll bet outside of games most people aren’t paying for a thing. They download the free app and put up with whatever ads are in the app. Why Apple wants to screw over indie developers who probably aren’t making a ton of money makes no sense to me. When Steve Jobs launched the App Store he told the WSJ that Apple wasn’t looking to make money off of it. Clearly that’s not the case now. When Tim Cook told Wall Street Apple would double services revenues this is one way they’re doing it - squeezing as much as they can out of indie developers.
 
Last edited:
I’ve had my email (and VPN) with ProtonMail from day 1. I pay for a subscription through their website, I suspect like the vast majority of people do....just like with Netflix or Spotify. It really isn’t that hard. For those that want ease of use, there’s IAP. The company can choose to pass on those costs or not - ProtonMail chose to pass on those costs so are NOT losing money AT ALL. I’m a bit concerned that these companies feel it is their right to do business on other people‘s platforms yet don’t want to pay their way.

The easy thing for me to do as a customer, is take my business elsewhere when I don’t like how a company is operating. I no longer use Spotify and will never purchase an Epic game. As from next month, I will no longer be a Proton customer....saving myself $175 US per year. I have already purchased S/MIME email certificates for myself and family to allow digital signatures and end to end encryption of our iCloud email addresses at a significant saving ($14 per 3yrs). ProtonMail is positively clunky and outrageously expensive in comparison.

92FF118A-C653-4875-A33A-0FC0F3E8842A.png88CDDBC9-822D-4A87-B52C-51E1FFE3C39A.pngC0A1591E-BD2A-4896-8700-D26A2E3FAD8F.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: brand
Apple changed the rules, there was no problem for a few years, so calling them cry babies is unfair imo.
Apple has never allowed apps to advertise in the app that they could sign up outside of the app. The concept is that free apps get a free ride. If you bring your own customers that’s one thing, but if your success depends on Apple’s marketing building your business then you have to pay. Period. Keep in mind, there were no free apps when you had to get them from your carrier.
 
It’s definitely an issue if Apple think they can force companies who make money outside of the App Store to cut them a piece of the pie.

How are they forcing a company to give them a piece of the pie? It INCREASES customer choice. The company can choose to pass on those costs to customers - which ProtonMail has done. ProtonMail is receiving THE SAME amount from IAP customers as they do from customers who sign up via the website. Customers can choose to pay via IAP or go to the website and pay.

Surely you’re not going to say people are so stupid nowadays that they can’t go to a website and learn more about the company that they intend to do business with?
 
...
What rule is this? The same rule that Apple didn’t care about for 2 years?
...
It's not binary, black and white and flip a switch. Apple treats it's developers equally within a class. Changing market conditions, business requirements etc sometimes take time to catch up to each other. However, it still appears Proton violated some app store guidelines.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.