Good. I would like to see the whole PC industry transition to ARM.
At my day job, the IT people decided that the policy should be that everybody gets new laptops every three years. That way, the hardware is always covered by a warranty.I've never tried out an ARM powered Surface (and for that matter, I don't own or use any Surface product). I'm curious if anyone who follows this closely believes that Qualcomm could potentially offer something competitive (i.e., fast/powerful performance) in a couple years?
While I don't see this as a near-term threat to Apple, I'm more interested in whether it could be a threat to x86 and Intel in a couple years, and take some Windows share from Intel in lower powered devices?
Meanwhile at Intel... *cricket* don't even have an ARM-based chip to compete... Aside from that Windows need to start investing more to ARM based Windows 11. The developer version is buggy.Good luck. By 2023 apple will be far ahead.
Not really competition though. Apple is not going to use Qualcomm chips, Apple is not going to sell chips on the open market to other OEMs. So the only competition would be trying to match the performance so that other OEMs could match Apples performance. But as someone else pointed out, without the software optimization, I don't see where this will help drive any real improvements. We already see this playing out in the phone market.Competition is never bad.
But it takes them so long to even try to catch up Apple...
if only apple paid their designers better to retain them.
Much like after Apple purchased PA Semi though
Yes, they won't have a choice if ARM starts to take hold in the PC market. Microsoft will change the licensing on Windows 11 for ARM at some point very soon. Then it will be up to Apple to enable a version of Bootcamp for Apple Silicon Macs. Microsoft doesn't care what hardware you are running as long as you are using a legal copy of Windows.So will Microsoft support these with Windows 11 for ARM? They've pretty much said they're not going to support Windows 11 VMs on Apple silicon. I don't really know who the bad guy is regarding Windows 11 on ARM for Macs, whether it's MS, Apple, or Intel.
It's not only about the money!if only apple paid their designers better to retain them.
No idea what they are providing new PC wise but even the cheapest i3 chips from the last couple of years run circles around the best 2011 Sandy Bridge based chips (Gen 2 i series chips).At my day job, the IT people decided that the policy should be that everybody gets new laptops every three years. That way, the hardware is always covered by a warranty.
Well, lemme tell you... All the new laptops running Windows have been nothing but problems. Dreadful. I suppose that could partially be due to new Windows versions (dunno), but generally the hardware just sucks all around. Slower, very unreliable, you name it. The 10 year old Lenovo I use for work engineering tasks runs so much better that it's laughable.
If this trend continues, the Intel based suppliers might be in for a bad few years. This might not be due to the Intel parts, but it's hard to separate the various pieces.
(Of course, my experience may be completely unique to my company.)
Good. I would like to see the whole PC industry transition to ARM.
PC gamers will continue to buy x86 hardware, x86 isn't going anywhere anytime soon.PC gamers will hate it. They won't be ready to move from x86 for a long long time because they have these big game libraries and old old titles that they don't want to give up.
Qualcomm made CPU's for Surface computers running ARM in the past so I think they have very good relationship with Microsoft. But, the problem for those ARM Surface computers was lack of software support and performance of the CPU's. Now, MSFT has emulation ready, but they need to make leaps on the performance part. Will be interesting if they can pull that off, or they are just talking up the stock price.It would be so funny if their first offering blew away Intel chips. Does this also mean that MS will license Windows on ARM? Clearly Qualcomm must have assurances that it can run windows
Yes, they won't have a choice if ARM starts to take hold in the PC market.
It would be so funny if their first offering blew away Intel chips. Does this also mean that MS will license Windows on ARM? Clearly Qualcomm must have assurances that it can run windows
with intel and amd on x86 architecture? because on arm Intel and amd are in the beginning stage....They don't need to beat M-series. They are competing with Intel and AMD.
How big of a market is the PC gamer group? Enough to sustain an entire infrastructure?PC gamers will continue to buy x86 hardware, x86 isn't going anywhere anytime soon.