Simple calculation
I agree. My prediction is Apple might increase it a bit while making the bezel smaller.
In order to keep the "Retina" claim with a 300DPI linear resolution, the largest possible diagonal is 3.84", which according to the DPI calculator site gives us a 3.2" × 2.13" screen.
You might say that's too small as it's still under 4", but one thing to keep in mind: iPhone's display is larger than its diagonal indicates in comparison to Android phones because of the more square aspect ratio. An iPhone at 3.84" diagonal will be plenty big.
To give a quick comparison, an Android phone with a 4.3" qHD display like many HTC and Motorola phones will have a dimension of 3.75" × 2.11". The hypothetical 3.84" iPhone display will actually be (extremely slightly) wider than the 4.3" Android phone. To me the width of the phone is what really matters for usability within reasons and I think I'll be very happy with an iPhone with a ~3.8" display, as long as the bezel is kept in check. I don't really want to see it get much bigger physically.
p.s. I just read the original Korean article in question and it sounds very dubious. Not only the reporter gets fact wrong - "the iPhone display is 1:2" - he claims "Apple's new management team is following Samsung's lead by going with a bigger screen" (not HTC?) and adds that this is a great news for Korean display suppliers as the prices for LCD panels will go up which should help the bottom line of the display makers. Pumping up the display stocks?
The problem isn't the screen size, the problem is resolution. Making a change to one of them means making a change to the other in order to maintain the "retina display "claim.
I agree. My prediction is Apple might increase it a bit while making the bezel smaller.
In order to keep the "Retina" claim with a 300DPI linear resolution, the largest possible diagonal is 3.84", which according to the DPI calculator site gives us a 3.2" × 2.13" screen.
You might say that's too small as it's still under 4", but one thing to keep in mind: iPhone's display is larger than its diagonal indicates in comparison to Android phones because of the more square aspect ratio. An iPhone at 3.84" diagonal will be plenty big.
To give a quick comparison, an Android phone with a 4.3" qHD display like many HTC and Motorola phones will have a dimension of 3.75" × 2.11". The hypothetical 3.84" iPhone display will actually be (extremely slightly) wider than the 4.3" Android phone. To me the width of the phone is what really matters for usability within reasons and I think I'll be very happy with an iPhone with a ~3.8" display, as long as the bezel is kept in check. I don't really want to see it get much bigger physically.
p.s. I just read the original Korean article in question and it sounds very dubious. Not only the reporter gets fact wrong - "the iPhone display is 1:2" - he claims "Apple's new management team is following Samsung's lead by going with a bigger screen" (not HTC?) and adds that this is a great news for Korean display suppliers as the prices for LCD panels will go up which should help the bottom line of the display makers. Pumping up the display stocks?
Last edited: