Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This discussion is going in circles. What would you rather have Apple implement? Isn't this more of an Android problem and Apple simply trying to increase compatibility with them?
It is an Apple problem. Would you not like to receive high quality pictures from people who don't use iMessage? Also, iMessages deprecates to SMS when iMessage fails, I would rather it deprecate to RCS before SMS honestly if they would prioritize messaging that way on iOS 18.
 
there's no "carrier lock in". You only need a phone number(or a Sim card)
you're locked in to using a carrier for RCS. why is everyone so confused about the statement?

you're locked into using a carrier. the moment you stop paying a carrier, you cannot use RCS.

a SIM card is using a carrier.
 
nope. it's literally more confusing.

because that button could be disabled for more than one reason.
- a group chat that added an RCS person that doesn't support video chat
- you traveled to a different country and use a different carrier
- you could be in a different country but also use the same carrier, but that carrier opted to disable video chat for roaming

a video button being disabled for a green bubble SMS person on iMessage is just... basically one reason: they don't have iMessage.

That's less confusing than the alternative. I try to FaceTime someone that's abroad and you know what happens? It rings, and rings and rings until it fails to connect.
 
I don’t want it on my phone. That’s the problem.

Idk why rcs and lagdroid fans seem to have issue with the fact many of us don’t want this near our phones. But hopefully this stops the whining and keeps iMessage on iPhone.

Mine will be turned off.
Did you also turn of SMS and phone calls?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProbablyDylan
I think it's plain to see that some users here are enjoying arguing in circles. I will close out my argument by saying that we've not yet seen how Apple has chosen to implement RCS (did they build a hub, using the carrier's, etc), so we have that to look out for.

This is a net positive for communication in general. It's good to have options, that much is undeniable.
 
more unknowns that a user needs to learn per carrier that they signed up for. not all carriers supporting RCS universal profile support the same exact features which leads to a disconnect on what features are available when you talk to XYZ person.
Users don't need to learn anything and didn't apple already state what features it will support?
 
  • Like
Reactions: robvalentine
This is obvious. My point is that our day-to-day communications should not be reliant on these paid carriers

We should be locked into something that is free, cross platform, simple, and reliable/secure like Telegram. iMessage doesn't circle all of that but is way better than being locked into carriers for day to day communication.
Just reading through the thread . . . i want to understand - you're upset because this is a feature that requires a cellular carrier?

Ah never mind got to the end. I think I hear what you're saying. But I don't think not implementing RCS is really the best route. And since iMessage is natively an Apple technology (thus a feature of owning an apple product), I can't imagine seeing that be a universal standard anytime soon.

I am curious to know what fragmentation is going to look like in group settings.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.