Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So 10,000 people at google can read my post, but you're worried about another 10 or so while my message hops through the internet. Not sure that matters except to the uninformed.
It does, SMS is considered to be unsafe and are being used widely. There personal information, MFA/2FA, activation codes, ticket info etc all being sent in clear text. Sure, not saying Google are the good guys and aren't harvesting information about you as a user, but they are less likely to be the ones wanting to hack into your account.

Also it seems like RCS are end to end ecrypted, there are some rumors that it won't be on iOS which is something that's interesting to follow up on if it will be.

But, while RCS is more secure in some aspects compared to SMS (in terms of encryption) the feature set makes the attack surface much bigger.
 
Hopefully. The article itself mentions that RCS is a less secure than iMessage, and that it relies on carrier implementation and Google. Users should have a visual cue that they're messaging within a less secure environment than iMessage, and the green bubbles do that, although I'm not opposed to three colors. Blue for secure iMessage, Green for cleartext SMS, Red or orange or something for RCS. Just so users are immediately aware of what level of protection their messages have.
RCS is unencrypted on iPhone because Apple refused to implement encryption. RCS is encrypted on Android devices, and I find it difficult to believe that Apple -- a trillion dollar company whose market capitalization is the same size as the GDP of the United Kingdom -- couldn't scrounge together the resources to make it happen.
 
RCS is unencrypted on iPhone because Apple refused to implement encryption. RCS is encrypted on Android devices, and I find it difficult to believe that Apple -- a trillion dollar company whose market capitalization is the same size as the GDP of the United Kingdom -- couldn't scrounge together the resources to make it happen.

Android RCS is encrypted because Google added encryption between Android devices. Apple is following the GSMA RCS specs, which at the moment, doesn't have encryption.

Apple has said they are working on having it added to the official spec.
 
Android RCS is encrypted because Google added encryption between Android devices. Apple is following the GSMA RCS specs, which at the moment, doesn't have encryption.

Apple has said they are working on having it added to the official spec.
Yes, exactly. Given the rivalry between Apple and Google, I wouldn't expect Apple to use Google's encryption for RCS. But Apple is a trillion-dollar company. They have immense resources at their disposal and they could have implemented E2EE if they wanted to. They chose not to, for a reason: They need iPhone users to feel superior. It's the same reason they refuse to release iMessage for Android devices.

I agree that the RCS standard should include E2EE, but Apple has, for years, refused to even engage with GSMA on the development of the standard. If they had, encryption would probably already be part of the protocol. And I doubt that they're particularly interested in doing it even now, because there is nothing in it for them; it would only serve to make iMessage less attractive.
 
Haven’t used iMessage in years as everyone uses a cross platform app anyway as groups of people tend to be cross platform.
is change for the sake of appeasing people that unable to work with existing cross platform apps for some reason.
Appeasing Americans, primarily. The rest of the world knew WhatsApp before it was bought by Meta.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimFL1 and strongy
It's a big deal apparently in the US.
A big chunk of American people discriminate users that have green bubbles in a conversation (vs the blue ones in the iPhone).
It's funny because a Samsung Fold costing around 2k would have green bubbles, vs an iPhone 6S that it's valued around 200 bucks.

Some article that comments even bullying because of this:
I'd rather have the iPhone 6S.
 
I fear they‘ll drag their feet. Apple chose to implement UP 2.4, which is multiple years old, instead of the most recent 2.6 (at the time of them starting work on RCS).

2.4 is coincidentally the bare minimum one has to support for 5G certification in China. That sounds totally like something Apple would do to keep an edge on RCS with their own chat ecosystem.
Yup, if China wants it, it’ll get added. If China DOESN’T want it, probably not. :)
 
I have one question about this RCS thing: does it require the phone provider's cooperation?

Do the americans want to bring us back to paying per message in the name of having the right coloured bubbles?

Yes yes, we know. You use whatsapp. Fully aware outside the USA - it's that app. Since this is a domestic website, it reports all info. Take it or leave it :)
And you think the likes of Verizon or Sprint or whatever sells you cell phone service in the US isn't spying on you and selling anything you send via SMS? :)
 
I have one question about this RCS thing: does it require the phone provider's cooperation?

Do the americans want to bring us back to paying per message in the name of having the right coloured bubbles?
My understanding is that Google's RCS implementation goes around the carriers, so if all users on the chat are using Google's messaging app then it doesn't require the carrier's cooperation.

However, Apple is doing the absolute bare minimum required for RCS. So they're punting that responsibility to the carriers. In the U.S., the major carriers are already using Google's RCS implementation, but the MVNO's (smaller companies that piggy-back off of the major carriers) are left to either build out their own RCS infrastructure, and many of them won't because it's expensive.

Again, this is just my understanding. If I am wrong, someone please correct me with references.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
No they don't; a big chunk of high-schoolers, perhaps. 99.9% of adults, in the US, don't give a crap.

That said, my daughter (in high school) and the majority of her friends use Snapchat.

Unfortunately, considering what I have read is far more spread than high-schoolers.
There are a lot of articles discussing the same impact in dating life.

Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 11.08.02.png


Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 11.09.22.png


Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 11.10.47.png



Screenshot 2024-07-09 at 11.12.28.png
 
My understanding is that Google's RCS implementation goes around the carriers, so if all users on the chat are using Google's messaging app then it doesn't require the carrier's cooperation.

Ah... different coloured bubbles redux. And that advertising company as gatekeeper.

However, Apple is doing the absolute bare minimum required for RCS. So they're punting that responsibility to the carriers. In the U.S., the major carriers are already using Google's RCS implementation, but the MVNO's (smaller companies that piggy-back off of the major carriers) are left to either build out their own RCS infrastructure, and many of them won't because it's expensive.

Again, this is just my understanding. If I am wrong, someone please correct me with references.

Well, if the carrier is involved I'll be turning mine off. I don't want to go back to that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NetMage
Unfortunately, considering what I have read is far more spread than high-schoolers.
There are a lot of articles discussing the same impact in dating life.
Ffs, is this real? People not wanting to date someone with the wrong colour on the chat-bubble?
And if it is... Maybe this can be sold as a feature. Stop people from maybe marrying an idiot on an early stage.
 
Ah... different coloured bubbles redux. And that advertising company as gatekeeper.
That's just Google's implementation, which is also end-to-end encrypted. But if you don't trust Google, that's fair. I don't either. But I also don't trust Apple (or Microsoft, or Amazon, or any other company). Anyone who thinks that any of those companies are concerned with their users' privacy is playing the fool.

As for your desire to not involve the carriers, aren't you already doing that? If you're on iPhone and are sending messages to Android users, you're using SMS or MMS messages, and that involves the carriers whether you turn on RCS or not.
 
Ffs, is this real? People not wanting to date someone with the wrong colour on the chat-bubble?
And if it is... Maybe this can be sold as a feature. Stop people from maybe marrying an idiot on an early stage.
Yes, it's a real thing.

And it's not just among young people looking for dates. My cousin (late 50s) and my nephew (late 30s) have tried to green-bubble shame me. It's quite pervasive in the U.S. because most American consumers are sheep and are obsessed with brand image.
 
Unfortunately, considering what I have read is far more spread than high-schoolers.
There are a lot of articles discussing the same impact in dating life.

View attachment 2395680

View attachment 2395681

View attachment 2395682


View attachment 2395683

I've been using iMessage since it was released, and due to the nature of my job, I message dozens of new people a month. I've met one single person that has cared.

The blue/green bubble thing was always overblown by the media. I just don't buy it..
 
My understanding is that Google's RCS implementation goes around the carriers, so if all users on the chat are using Google's messaging app then it doesn't require the carrier's cooperation.

However, Apple is doing the absolute bare minimum required for RCS. So they're punting that responsibility to the carriers. In the U.S., the major carriers are already using Google's RCS implementation, but the MVNO's (smaller companies that piggy-back off of the major carriers) are left to either build out their own RCS infrastructure, and many of them won't because it's expensive.

Again, this is just my understanding. If I am wrong, someone please correct me with references.

Apple isn't necessarily doing the bare minimum, they're just supporting the actual RCS standard called the Universal Profile. Google has proprietary extensions to the RCS standard that Apple is not supporting. Rather, Apple says they plan to work with the GSMA and Google to roll Google's extensions into the RCS standard. We will see if that ends up happening.
 
I sincerely doubt that Apple will ever allow blue bubbles with non-Apple devices, unless they're forced to by some regulatory agency. They need those blue bubbles to make their users feel superior. This is why Apple refuses to release the iMessage app for Android: The purpose of the blue bubble color is mainly for iPhone users' ego and for Apple's balance sheet.

And Apple could have implemented end-to-end encryption in their RCS implementation if they wanted to. They chose not to because, again, they need their users to feel superior to everyone else.
Or stay with me here. They didn’t want to pull a Google and do encryption that’s proprietary and holds them responsible. They are working with the standard (that Google ignored) to try to make RCS better for everyone.
 
I've been using iMessage since it was released, and due to the nature of my job, I message dozens of new people a month. I've met one single person that has cared.

The blue/green bubble thing was always overblown by the media.

It's apparently a bigger deal with kids, but I think most kids these days use things like Snapchat, Discord, or Whatsapp anyway so even then it's not a big deal.
 
Where have you read that RCS isn't or won't be encrypted on iOS devices? Everywhere I read its says that its end to end when both sender and receiver has it enabled.
That’s Googles implementation where they ignored the RCS standard. Apple didn’t ignore the standard and is working to make the standard better instead of just doing whatever and further fragmenting the RCS ecosystem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.