They definitely have the technical skills and resources. But I doubt that they have the inclination to do anything that would weaken their precious blue bubbles.Forget the technical skills - do they have the inclination?
They definitely have the technical skills and resources. But I doubt that they have the inclination to do anything that would weaken their precious blue bubbles.Forget the technical skills - do they have the inclination?
This. Plus even with the extension providing E2EE between clients on Google Messages they are still following the standard because the universal profile explicitly allows for extensions. Now adding E2EE to the profile would be ideal, but I don't expect that for some time. Regardless, RCS is a HUGE improvement in functionality and security over SMS/MMS even without E2EE. I've heard it referred to as sort of an SMS 2.0. I think it's more like an SMS 10.0.No, the ONLY thing Google doesn't follow is the (lack-of) E2E encryption. They follow the standard to a tee otherwise.
RCS is unencrypted on iPhone because the Universal Profile (which is the only formal and recognized way to implement RCS) doesn’t include encryption. Further, it likely doesn’t include encryption because China doesn’t WANT it to include encryption, and the three Chinese carriers are members on the leadership committee for the GSMA.RCS is unencrypted on iPhone because Apple refused to implement encryption. RCS is encrypted on Android devices, and I find it difficult to believe that Apple -- a trillion dollar company whose market capitalization is the same size as the GDP of the United Kingdom -- couldn't scrounge together the resources to make it happen.
Whether or not anyone has heard of this personally, by this point, really depends on the person’s disposition. If they’ve said anything in the past would mean “That whole green bubble thing is stupid, who is that petty?”, then the people around them who think that way, most certainly aren’t going to say anything to them about it. Or, because it’s something they believe but don’t feel they need to let everyone know about, they’ll falsely exclaim “I KNOW RIGHT?? Folks can be so shallow.”Unfortunately, considering what I have read is far more spread than high-schoolers.
There are a lot of articles discussing the same impact in dating life.
View attachment 2395680![]()
'Green bubble shaming' at play in DOJ suit against Apple
Android users have long complained that texting someone with an iPhone on iMessage is an unpleasant experience. The Justice Department argues it is also an example of anti-competitive behavior.www.npr.org
View attachment 2395681![]()
Why Apple’s iMessage Is Winning: Teens Dread the Green Text Bubble
The iPhone maker cultivated iMessage as a must-have blue-bubble texting tool for teens. Android users trigger a just-a-little-less-cool green bubble: “Ew, that’s gross.”www.wsj.com
View attachment 2395682
View attachment 2395683![]()
Green ‘bubble-shaming’ can lead to school alienation, missed romances
Apple will make changes early next year to improve texting. It may be time for iPhone users to stop shaming green-bubble texters (aka Android owners).www.kcrw.com
RCS is unencrypted on iPhone because the Universal Profile (which is the only formal and recognized way to implement RCS) doesn’t include encryption. Further, it likely doesn’t include encryption because China doesn’t WANT it to include encryption, and the three Chinese carriers are members on the leadership committee for the GSMA.
That's just Google's implementation, which is also end-to-end encrypted. But if you don't trust Google, that's fair. I don't either. But I also don't trust Apple (or Microsoft, or Amazon, or any other company). Anyone who thinks that any of those companies are concerned with their users' privacy is playing the fool.
As for your desire to not involve the carriers, aren't you already doing that? If you're on iPhone and are sending messages to Android users, you're using SMS or MMS messages, and that involves the carriers whether you turn on RCS or not.
How is this handling international texts if you’re not on wifi and your service doesn’t include international texting?
Why does 5G require RCS?2.4 is coincidentally the bare minimum one has to support for 5G certification in China
For us non-US users, this means nothing since very few people uses SMS, iMessage or the RCS standard at all.
Yeah, RCS is for the olds, it’s the Facebook of the futureI already mentioned it in this thread, but my teenager doesn't care either way since everyone she associates with uses Snapchat.
I'm a little surprised that Snapchat is still a thing...but it is.
Why does 5G require RCS?
China enforces all devices utilizing 5G to also support RCS (minimum UP 2.4) to be sold over there.Why does 5G require RCS?
It’s not. RCS was the result of the GSMA carriers looking at WhatsApp saying, “WE SHOULD DO THAT, LOOK AT THE MONIES!” And, because making money was the goal and not “being useful” carriers did things like roll out RCS solutions that would only work when communicating to devices on their own networks! They didn’t see that as “we did something stupid, let’s do it right” though, they saw it as “RCS sucks because we can’t make money on it so why even bother?” which is why the carriers in the US had no problem handing over the keys to Google.1. How is RCS technically superior to WhatsApp?
They better still be in green bubbles
Heh. It was in jest, in light of the previous post about bullying. I'm Canadian, and didn't actually cheer for Panthers. Mind you, I didn't cheer for the Oilers either.I was going to congratulate the photo on a well deserved stanley cup after a nice 3 year try-
then saw the massage and had to post this graphic i designed back in 1990
then say the user name who looked familiar, a friendly old mac user,
so all is good, except 5 is better than 1!
View attachment 2395739
iMessage is literally proprietary encryption.So yeah Apple would be dumb to do proprietary encryption right now.
They’ll do it if and when China mandates it and not a moment before. And, considering the government in China, I doubt China’s carriers will agree to will mandate it.There is no way that Apple and Google, with their immense resources, couldn't build encryption (or any other features) into the base RCS protocol if they wanted to. I just doubt that they will, and in this I trust Apple less than Google because Apple has a history of doing everything behind their so-called "walled garden" instead of building on universal standards.
I’m looking for any documentation regarding that being a part of the Universal Profile and NOT Google’s proprietary extensions, but not finding anything.This is disingenuous. RCS uses SSL encryption when in transit, only being unencrypted on your device, briefly at the RCS hub (before it's deleted) and at the recipient's device.
SMS can send to pretty much any phone and/or SMS enabled device in the world, RCS can’t. At best, RCS is SMS 1.5. Wait, I forgot, RCS has to fallback to SMS when there’s no data signal, so more like SMS 1.0.1.This. Plus even with the extension providing E2EE between clients on Google Messages they are still following the standard because the universal profile explicitly allows for extensions. Now adding E2EE to the profile would be ideal, but I don't expect that for some time. Regardless, RCS is a HUGE improvement in functionality and security over SMS/MMS even without E2EE. I've heard it referred to as sort of an SMS 2.0. I think it's more like an SMS 10.0.
It’s not. RCS was the result of the GSMA carriers looking at WhatsApp saying, “WE SHOULD DO THAT, LOOK AT THE MONIES!” And, because making money was the goal and not “being useful” carriers did things like roll out RCS solutions that would only work when communicating to devices on their own networks! They didn’t see that as “we did something stupid, let’s do it right” though, they saw it as “RCS sucks because we can’t make money on it so why even bother?” which is why the carriers in the US had no problem handing over the keys to Google.