you wrong that this is simply a mass produced toy where the QC of the screen doesn't matter
He didn't say that, try responding again to what that poster actually wrote.
you wrong that this is simply a mass produced toy where the QC of the screen doesn't matter
That's good ur still in the 15 days. I forget not everyone bought on launch daySorry to hear about the camera issue? Are u saying it takes photos w pinkish hue?
^^^ Thats always been my question.
Why cant this be resolved in the store. If you are returning to the store for a specific screen issue, it seems logical that you would want to inspect the replacement for the same issue.
Why would an Apple staffer not want to do this...especially of you state it and open the product right then and there?
Perhaps its as simple as too much assumption on the part of Apple that the issues are isolated therefore no need to inspect a replacement?
Or perhaps its the consumer perception that these issues are not worthy of a return and not issues at all from Apples perspective so rather than discuss it with them you take your 14 day return/exchange and run?
Can any of these exchanges be done post the 14 day period?
I have a new IP3 and have not really looked for the issues noted by the OP (except for dust) as many require a deliberate action to find. If later, however, I do notice distortion due to color hues am I not entitled to a repair/exchange?
![]()
Actually yes and no. Yes, you are right that the hype is part of the expectations problem. No, you are wrong that this is simply a mass produced toy where the QC of the screen doesn't matter. I use mine primarily as a business tool, not as fan-boy toy. Believe me no toy loving OCD here. I read large amounts of e mails and documents on it. A blotchy tinted screen is a major issue for that use. And it cost around $900. That's not a cheap toy. And if you can't use the existing technology with decent QC, you shouldn't release the product until you can. The QC is terrible on this product. It wasn't ready for mass production and therefore the screen lottery. Still love my original, insufficient memory and all. Never gave the screen a second thought on that one, or looked for any problem with it.
this is truly some kind of phenomena occurring.
There are at least twenty people on this forum that appear to be returning these over an over again , as many as 12 times, perhaps more.
I've never heard of anything like this. It's beyond my understanding actually, and is almost certainly the result of a company's lax return policy.
In striving to have the best customer support, Apple has created some peculiar side effects. But really, i'm probably naive in thinking that this is somehow isolated to these products. After all, one only needs to look at the average american consumer to wonder if they aren't all looney toons
I got a call from Apple Executive Relations yesterday (for the second time) about this. You can read about it on a blog I don't want to advertise due to board regulations.
Apple is taking notice.
I got a call from Apple Executive Relations yesterday (for the second time) about this.
Been there, done that.
"We're sorry you're having issues with your screen. Please send pictures."
pictures sent
"Sorry, it's within spec. We can offer a refund."
I got a call from Apple Executive Relations yesterday (for the second time) about this. You can read about it on a blog I don't want to advertise due to board regulations.
Apple is taking notice.
ouch! so apple is just becoming another huge corporate giant that's busy making the buck now...
Send me a pm on the blog pls. Would love to read it. Cheers!
Been there, done that.
"We're sorry you're having issues with your screen. Please send pictures."
pictures sent
"Sorry, it's within spec. We can offer a refund."
Who are these people who go thru 8, 10, 12 and 13 iPads?
That is easy to answer. I never gave the original a second thought because there was no reason to do so. The screen was fine. I wasn't looking for dust, or one dead pixel, or light bleeds or corner shadows. It looked fine, and it was and is. Now fast forward to the New iPad. I get that one by mail order and can immediately see it was a blotchy pink and green mess. It just jumps out at you. They replaced it. Figured no big deal. They were cool about it and said it was defective. No bigee. I should have looked at the second one in the store, but I trusted them and figured what are the odds of getting two in a row. Well that one was even worse. They replace that one as well with no issue. The third one is still pink but at least fairly uniform. The genius says none of them are perfect. I'm not returning three. So I decide to live with it. End of story. That to me my friend is lousy QC because no way three in a row should be that way. Like I said in another post, not the end of the world, but not a good Apple experience either for about $900 bucks. So the fan boy crappy kind of falls on deaf ears here.
On the reviewers, I can only say I suspect they get cherry picked models but I have no personal knowledge of that.
Says the guy who joined a chat room on the internet to discuss consumer electronics and software with a bunch of random anonymous people, and whose current "priority" is participating in a discussion they clearly have no interest in.
Says the guy who joined a chat room on the internet to discuss consumer electronics and software with a bunch of random anonymous people, and whose current "priority" is participating in a discussion they clearly have no interest in.
honestly I'm starting to believe that what really messed everything up is the bigger initial launch, there is really no way to produce at the rate iPads are being produced without sacrificing quality. I can just imagine a meeting between tim cook and the manager from whoever is making the displays. It might go something like this:
tim- I need you to produce xmillion screens, we're lunching is these other countries next week and we can't let the supply go below x amount.
manager- well we can't physically produce more that x amount, the only way is to reduce the number of rejected screens.
tim- are they that bad?
- well mostly we're having problems with screen uniformity, its very slight but only a well trained eye might tell... but if we change the calibration to a yellower tone its less noticeable
tim- hmmmm I guess we could try that, as long as its not extremely noticeable I guess we can do it. We'll see how many people return and if its within a reasonable amount we can absorb the cost until demand drops.
honestly I'm starting to believe that what really messed everything up is the bigger initial launch, there is really no way to produce at the rate iPads are being produced without sacrificing quality. I can just imagine a meeting between tim cook and the manager from whoever is making the displays. It might go something like this:
tim- I need you to produce xmillion screens, we're lunching is these other countries next week and we can't let the supply go below x amount.
manager- well we can't physically produce more that x amount, the only way is to reduce the number of rejected screens.
tim- are they that bad?
- well mostly we're having problems with screen uniformity, its very slight but only a well trained eye might tell... but if we change the calibration to a yellower tone its less noticeable
tim- hmmmm I guess we could try that, as long as its not extremely noticeable I guess we can do it. We'll see how many people return and if its within a reasonable amount we can absorb the cost until demand drops.
This is exactly the same experience I've had! And I knew the moment I opened the first unit's box on Launch Day that the screen color/brightness was inferior to my iPad 2, just by turning it on. Major disappointment. This was well before checking out Apple or MacRumors forums. Not the Apple experience I've become accustomed to. That's all I'm saying.