Walk around a college campus and the 13 MBP dominates within the portable venue. This particular population is way too valuable for Apple to loose to competing hardware and OS. The 13 MBP will be updated in a manner such that it remains competitive, flexible, and stylishly elite yet not so costly as to alienate.
With PCs with double the power and screen size being half the cost, how is it not so costly that it alienates? Also, if they dropped the "Pro" branding, how much of a difference would that make to college students looking to buy one?
For people who ask why should Apple not discontinue the MBP 13" when the MB 13" is practically the same, ask yourself these questions.
Why do people buy an Audi A4 if they can buy a Seat Exeo (lot cheaper) with exact the same engine, interior, performance, etc. etc. ?
Why do people buy Hugo Boss polo instead of a non-brand polo which is made in the same company in China, made by the same people and made by the same supplies?
The answer is simple: status, differentiation, showing off, exclusivity and mainly status: how do other people see you?
It's the same with the MBP 13", and I agree with more people around here, if the MBP 13" will be discontinued I will consider other options than a Mac, since I am used to Windows and not a former Mac user this is not a big dilemma for me compared to people who are already used to a Mac.
And yes I am also one of these stupid dumbasses which pays 200 dollar/euro more for a laptop that looks more fancy but has the same specifications as a plastic alternative.
So be it.
I guess, personally, it's that whenever I go on about my love of Apple products to friends and family, they assume that I buy the Apple products that I buy because I want to buy into that kind of brand marketing and that I like my Apple products more for form than for function. In actuality, I'm a Mac user because the platform works and makes sense and isn't inconsistent (let alone vulnerable) in the ways that Windows is. I'm an iPod touch owner because, while I like my Motorola Droid and think that Android is a cool platform, the iPod touch is a better portable computer and while it looks nice, I use it for practical reasons rather to be inclusive in "the club". Though, honestly, it's people who buy these things superficially that give Mac users a bad reputation and I suppose I'm hopeful that more people aren't like this, but it's unrealistic.
Still doesn't explain why they added it in the first place. If they wanted 13" to be just a MacBook, why didn't they keep it so?
After watching the WWDC 2009 keynote a bunch, I think they rationalized that while the then-low-end 15" MacBook Pro had the exact same specs as the high-end 13" would-be Pro and had the FireWire port that people were complaining about the loss of. At the time, the 13" Pro was very different than the white MacBook that still used DDR2 RAM. Really, I think they messed it up by making the white MacBook so comparable.
Well, the current 13" uses 2008 CPU technology aka Core 2 Duo and Apple has no problems calling it a MacBook Pro. I doubt they have any issues calling 13" with Intel IGP a MacBook Pro.
I agree with you there. I don't think the issue of branding has to do with anything other than the fact that Apple will have a much easier time marketing a machine like the 13" Pro in the future were it not a "Pro", for anyone who wants a "Pro" machine, the 15" is the only one that somewhat fits the bill. You disagree and I respect that, so I guess the only constructive thing I can do is just say "we shall see what happens when it happens". I do get the feeling that no matter what they do with the 13" MBP, it'll be very telling.
The aluminum MacBook had 9400M as well.
It did, I was referring to the plastic MacBook before the Early 2009 model.
Yeah, they are gonna kill the 17 before the 13; sorry dude. Apple doesn't care what you 'select few' want and neither does any other company that has about $50 billion in cash. And as far as June of 2009 versus now...profits went up a lot on every product they had, including the MBP. Also, they had the MBP13 for years as just the MacBook (same computer, and it was still their top selling laptop).
If companies constantly discontinued their best selling products and then 'assumed' their buyers would purchase another one of their products, then there would not be an Apple today. They had that issue previously and Jobs and his current team (and much so from Mr. Cooke as well) changed that and it went from a near dead company to one of the most profitable in the world.
This is where they would have gone about 15 years ago...
They are as likely to kill the 17" MacBook Pro as they are the Mac Pro, and really, for the same reasons, neither machine is likely to go anywhere as they have no other machine that does what they do. Between the white MacBook and the 13" Pro, there is a redundancy, save for FireWire (which most consumers looking for a 13" Mac don't even know about) and Aluminum, they are the same computer under the hood. You could kill one, or merge the two with little trouble, if any. As for your claims that they'd be bankrupt, that implies that they were bankrupt before the advent of the 13" Pro, which, I'm sorry, is completely ridiculous.