I don't think that's how they will work. It's close range.
Ridiculous.whoever needs these probably needs a mental institute more. how can you be so forgetful you need a tracker?
Not to those of us who do not have, don't even want, an Apple watch so would not have a charger. Whereas a MagSafe puck charger just might come into my possession in a few weeks.Would make the most sense to charge these on the Apple Watch charger surely? Looks like a very similar size and profile.
The one who can check is the one who owns Apple ID associated to the Tag.or stolen by someone with an iOS device? I guess when they are stealing it, they could check for an airtag?
whoever needs these probably needs a mental institute more. how can you be so forgetful you need a tracker?
I’m sure tracking pet will be one of the main usage.Do people without security or memory issues really need these? Or just want them?
I have the same dilemma though as the only personal use case I can envisage is if the small tag is compact enough to safely attach to my cat's collar. Not so much that I have a window into his COVID-ignorant life of sunbeams and serial killing, or can track his activity plus the exact garden borders of his despotic urban empire, but more practically so I can identify which of my neighbours are outright lying when they categorically deny feeding him.
Really seems to go against Apple's whole privacy focus. Can see tracking being abused. Lawsuits, etc.
Putting aside the fact that anyone can have something drop down the sofa, fall out of their pocket, get moved by a partner/kids, have something stolen, there are also millions of people in the world with Alzheimer's and similar conditions for whom this device could really improve their independence and quality of life - or should we just go by your solution of locking them up in mental institutions?
Why are people always so self-centred and blinkered when judging devices like these?
There’s no need to use the magnet to pair it though. You don’t have to do that with AirPods or an Apple TV or Apple Watch. you just have to hold it close.My thought was just you connect it but attaching it to back of iPhone. That automatically pairs it with your iCloud account. Makes sense to me.
Really 🤔 how so?
My understanding is Apples privacy focus is protecting users data from corporations. Block 3rd parties such as apps from tracking a users exact location. Hence why the added the option to limit apps from using precise location on iOS 14.
Personal trackers allow a users to track their own items. The data isn’t shared with 3rd parties.
It’s also worth pointing out this is no different to the current find my, which these will use. So what you’re saying is the existing “find my” already violates Apple‘s privacy focus.
Ok so you don’t realise that the current find my uses other people‘s iPhones and MacBooks to locate your apples device right now when it’s set to lost mode. They literally already do this.I think the difference here from 'Find My' is it uses devices owned by third parties to track (i.e. other iPhone users), but if that's done the same way that Apple's Covid Track and Trace framework works, then I don't see that there's any privacy issue.
whoever needs these probably needs a mental institute more. how can you be so forgetful you need a tracker?
before people get all weird about this. L0vetodream is a pretty eccentric leaker. So, this is pretty solid. He/she seems to like posting enigmatic tweets that are later explained.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe those iPhone have no way to know they’re interacting with the Tag. It just happen in background and the owners have no way to know or check. The only one who can see the Tag location is the owner of the Tag.I think the difference here from 'Find My' is it uses devices owned by third parties to track (i.e. other iPhone users), but if that's done the same way that Apple's Covid Track and Trace framework works, then I don't see that there's any privacy issue.
That's an absolutely ridiculous thought. They'll be $599, tops.Will this be like another $600?
I'd go further. If done well, Find my for everything enhances your privacy. Less likely for someone to find (or successfully steal) your things which might include much private information.Really 🤔 how so?
My understanding is Apples privacy focus is protecting users data from corporations. Block 3rd parties such as apps from tracking a users exact location. Hence why the added the option to limit apps from using precise location on iOS 14.
Personal trackers allow a users to track their own items. The data isn’t shared with 3rd parties.
It’s also worth pointing out this is no different to the current find my, which these will use. So what you’re saying is the existing “find my” already violates Apple‘s privacy focus.
And £599 in the UK. Which is even more expensive at around $775.That's an absolutely ridiculous thought. They'll be $599, tops.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe those iPhone have no way to know they’re interacting with the Tag. It just happen in background and the owners have no way to know or check. The only one who can see the Tag location is the owner of the Tag.
Ok so you don’t realise that the current find my uses other people‘s iPhones and MacBooks to locate your apples device right now when it’s set to lost mode. They literally already do this.
I don't understand the marketing/use case for this. Why would Apple venture into this space? It seems to be a little smaller than the Tile, but I know *ONE* person who uses a Tile on his keyring. I can't see people lining up outside stores for AirTags.
I suspect the reason why AirPower was discontinued was because the bottom fell out of the wireless charging price structure: I picked up a wireless charging stand for $13 the other day. I can't imagine AirTags will command a premium.
With Apple's push into home automation, I am surprised they aren't developing a more complete ecosystem of lights, sensors, cameras, and switches. That would make more sense than trackers.