Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would say that the biggest update here is the update to a 64bit CPU. This I wouldn't even call 'minor', as it is a major thing.

Keep in mind that this may mean that IOS7 comes out as a 64bit OS with 32bit compatibility. This means 64bit apps, which we already know, but this also means, as already mentioned, the ability for newer, faster hardware.

The 32bit memory limit that XP and the 32bit versions of Vista and Windows 7 have isn't just an OS limitation; it's an OS limitation. Jumping to 64bit completely kills that problem, especially with the 4GB memory limit that 32bit OSes have. This gets you the ability to have more RAM in the phone.

With the architecture being nearly the same between the two, this brings in the ability to have the same code base for IOS apps that Mac apps have. That's some huge cross-compatibility. In short iOS X; compatibility and portability from desktop to mobile to AppleTV. That is HUGE. M$ can't do that, nor Google.

Especially Google; Android devices are still 32bit, as well as their OS, so they are stuck with 32bit apps, 32bit OS, and the 4GB RAM limitation.

So sometimes the biggest improvements are the ones you can't see.

BL.

I proably will not even notice the 64bit. I know that the 5s will be faster but as i said not know the diffrence from 32bit to 64bit
 
As an owner of the three years old iPhone 4 I am looking forward to upgrading to the new iPhones 5S.
 
And some people show a lack of understanding for technology.

64-bit means absolutely nothing right now to the end user and won't for at least a couple years in the mobile sector.
10000000% false don't believe everything you read.
 
Yes those are all new but they only add up to a minor improvement. The speed is still hindered by iOS 7 animations, the battery life is very marginally better, and the other stuff is just modest upgrading.
If you think a 64 bit processor and a fingerprint sensor are minor I'd hate to be your significant other.
 
I have an iphone 5 and I'm going to grab the new one. Fingerprint scanner and improved camera has me itching for one.
 
If you think a 64 bit processor and a fingerprint sensor are minor I'd hate to be your significant other.

That was quite the leap you made there. Do tell me how 64 bit is going to enhance your life with the 5S. Also, the fingerprint sensor has potential, but currently has a very limited application (it can basically make two specific tasks easier).
 
Obviously this update isn't for iPhone 5 owners.

It's for 4S owners and is a huge upgrade for them.

Really? Cause I have a 5 and I am upgrading. I may not be in the majority but the jump in specs plus the FP sensor and better battery is enough to make me jump in. But I am cross upgrading as I do every year...my wife gets my old phone and I get the latest gold standard every year.
 
That was quite the leap you made there. Do tell me how 64 bit is going to enhance your life with the 5S. Also, the fingerprint sensor has potential, but currently has a very limited application (it can basically make two specific tasks easier).

The fact that a 64 bit processor exists on a phone (for the first time ever) is a huge leap in efficiency in the actual usage of the phone. The fingerprint sensor has massive applications as well
 
The fact that a 64 bit processor exists on a phone (for the first time ever) is a huge leap in efficiency in the actual usage of the phone. The fingerprint sensor has massive applications as well

Specifically tell me how 64 bit will impact you, because I don't believe it will. And replacing a passcode on the lock screen and App Store are "massive applications?"
 
That was quite the leap you made there. Do tell me how 64 bit is going to enhance your life with the 5S. Also, the fingerprint sensor has potential, but currently has a very limited application (it can basically make two specific tasks easier).

but what is your guess that the fingerprint scanner doesn't gain functionality in the next year? id say the odds of no new functionality is zero. just a passcode app that launches only off of the fingerprint scanner would be huge. and surely that is coming in short order.

----------

Really? Cause I have a 5 and I am upgrading. I may not be in the majority but the jump in specs plus the FP sensor and better battery is enough to make me jump in. But I am cross upgrading as I do every year...my wife gets my old phone and I get the latest gold standard every year.

exactly. and if you don't have someone to hand down to there is always resale. I will be upgrading on contract and selling my unlocked 5 for a net nice chunk of change. next year I may sell my 5s 32gb and buy an unlocked 6. sure that will net probably cost me 300$. but thw year after that I will be getting cash back on a new subsidized phone.

upgrading is easy on iphones as long as they continue to bold there value.
 
As long the resell value of iphones hold, the question is if happy with your carrier and plan. Most time selling the year old iphone more covers upgrade as long dont mind renewing contract. Sold my 5 64 g with apple care for 600 through CL. More than covers most of the 399 plus 250. Like need come up with like 100 bucks or so.

Not saying its the best way, but always have a new phone.
 
Really? Cause I have a 5 and I am upgrading. I may not be in the majority but the jump in specs plus the FP sensor and better battery is enough to make me jump in. But I am cross upgrading as I do every year...my wife gets my old phone and I get the latest gold standard every year.

Sure, but those who have a 5 and trash the 5S as being a "worthless update" are being very idiocentric. Obviously for those who have a 4S the 5S is a massive upgrade, and for those with a 5 who see the value it's a nice step up as well. There really isn't any reason though for people who have the 5 to trash the next generation upgrade, all that does is create hostility among those who want the 5S.
 
but what is your guess that the fingerprint scanner doesn't gain functionality in the next year? id say the odds of no new functionality is zero. just a passcode app that launches only off of the fingerprint scanner would be huge. and surely that is coming in short order.

----------



exactly. and if you don't have someone to hand down to there is always resale. I will be upgrading on contract and selling my unlocked 5 for a net nice chunk of change. next year I may sell my 5s 32gb and buy an unlocked 6. sure that will net probably cost me 300$. but thw year after that I will be getting cash back on a new subsidized phone.

upgrading is easy on iphones as long as they continue to bold there value.

I'm quite sure developers have no access to the fingerprint sensor - no API or anything. So any expansion near hand would be all of Apple's doing.
 
That was quite the leap you made there. Do tell me how 64 bit is going to enhance your life with the 5S. Also, the fingerprint sensor has potential, but currently has a very limited application (it can basically make two specific tasks easier).

Specifically tell me how 64 bit will impact you, because I don't believe it will. And replacing a passcode on the lock screen and App Store are "massive applications?"

You obviously didn't read my post. Go back and read post #48, then get back to us. Just because you don't aesthetically see any improvements doesn't mean that they aren't massive or major. You totally aren't getting the bigger picture.

BL.
 
I would say that the biggest update here is the update to a 64bit CPU. This I wouldn't even call 'minor', as it is a major thing.

Keep in mind that this may mean that IOS7 comes out as a 64bit OS with 32bit compatibility. This means 64bit apps, which we already know, but this also means, as already mentioned, the ability for newer, faster hardware.

The 32bit memory limit that XP and the 32bit versions of Vista and Windows 7 have isn't just an OS limitation; it's an OS limitation. Jumping to 64bit completely kills that problem, especially with the 4GB memory limit that 32bit OSes have. This gets you the ability to have more RAM in the phone.

With the architecture being nearly the same between the two, this brings in the ability to have the same code base for IOS apps that Mac apps have. That's some huge cross-compatibility. In short iOS X; compatibility and portability from desktop to mobile to AppleTV. That is HUGE. M$ can't do that, nor Google.

Especially Google; Android devices are still 32bit, as well as their OS, so they are stuck with 32bit apps, 32bit OS, and the 4GB RAM limitation.

So sometimes the biggest improvements are the ones you can't see.

BL.

No. Just no. You have been highly misinformed.

As long as ios runs on ARM and osx runs on x86, there will be no app that will run natively on both ios and osx.

If things are as you say, why are there no 32bit apps on osx that will also run on ios?
 
I have a 5 and I'm not updating. I'm holding out for an iPhone 6. Makes no sense. Maybe if I had an android I might be more willingly to switch every year because of the fragmentation, maybe, but definitely not an iPhone.
 
10000000% false don't believe everything you read.

I didn't read that anywhere. It is based on my experience with 64/32bit software on the desktop. 32bit vs 64bit windows? No noticeable difference until you require more than 4gb of ram - which is at least a couple generations away on iDevices.
 
No. Just no. You have been highly misinformed.

As long as ios runs on ARM and osx runs on x86, there will be no app that will run natively on both ios and osx.

If things are as you say, why are there no 32bit apps on osx that will also run on ios?

Misinformed? Sure about that?

http://www.zdnet.com/why-apple-went-64-bit-with-the-iphone-5s-7000020662/
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2424300,00.asp
http://www.cocoachina.com/cms/uploads/soft/130911/4196-130911095Z1.pdf

Every 32bit OS has had the same 4GB memory mapping limit, excluding some Unixes, and Linux. That was overcome with the onset of 64bit OSes, OS X included, and now, iOS.


From the 3rd link:

The architecture for 64-bit apps on iOS is almost identical to the architecture for OS X apps, making it easy to create a common code base that runs in both operating systems.

It may be easier than you think. So you may be a bit misinformed.

From the 2nd link:

Okay, So Why 64 Bit?
So the iPhone doesn't need a 64-bit processor yet. The iPad won't need a 64-bit processor. And no, I doubt we're going to see Macs going to ARM processors very soon. So why is the A7 64 bit? Speaking to a bunch of very smart analysts at an ARM event last night, I came to the conclusion that it's about developer tools and future Mac/iOS compatibility.

Most Macs, like most Windows machines, are 64-bit systems now. It's not considered unusual to have more than 4GB of RAM on your desktop PC. Putting the iPhone and iPad on a 64-bit footing will get iOS developers writing 64-bit-compatible apps, which will build a library of 64-bit apps for future iPads, but also for Macs.

Apple has slowly been bringing iOS-like features to Mac OS for years now: think of Launchpad and Gatekeeper. The ultimate prize, of course, would be to bring the million-plus iOS apps to Macs. Apple could do that with an ARM-compatible virtual machine on Mac hardware, but it would want the VM, the OS and the associated apps to play nicely in the much larger memory space available on Macs. That means moving the whole system over to 64 bit.

Like I said, there is a lot more under the hood that people aren't seeing, that is a major improvement, and paving the way for what could be even bigger things.

BL.
 
As long as ios runs on ARM and osx runs on x86, there will be no app that will run natively on both ios and osx.

True. But, if it is as you say, then all Apple would have to do make a build of OS X that could run on ARM or a build of iOS that could run on Intel, right?

Weren't there rumors that Apple was looking at bringing ARM to the Mac?

What about those features of iOS that were brought over to the OS X...?

Please tell me I'm not crazy for thinking so. :|
 
Misinformed? Sure about that?

http://www.zdnet.com/why-apple-went-64-bit-with-the-iphone-5s-7000020662/
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2424300,00.asp
http://www.cocoachina.com/cms/uploads/soft/130911/4196-130911095Z1.pdf

Every 32bit OS has had the same 4GB memory mapping limit, excluding some Unixes, and Linux. That was overcome with the onset of 64bit OSes, OS X included, and now, iOS.


From the 3rd link:



It may be easier than you think. So you may be a bit misinformed.

From the 2nd link:



Like I said, there is a lot more under the hood that people aren't seeing, that is a major improvement, and paving the way for what could be even bigger things.

BL.

Never said anything about the 4gb limit to you. I'm fully aware that 64 bit removes that, see post 68.

This is the specific line that I have issue with - which happens to be your major point.
In short iOS X; compatibility and portability from desktop to mobile to AppleTV. That is HUGE. M$ can't do that, nor Google.

Moving to 64bit does not in any way allow for this. Like I said before, if this was possible, it would have been already done with 32bit apps, as 64bit operating systems can run 32bit apps all day.

The problem is that iOS is ARM and OS X is x86. It is impossible to run the same native code when you have different architectures - hence the need for a VM as mentioned in your 2nd link. Needing a VM is exactly the opposite of having "compatibility and portability from desktop to mobile."

BTW iOS apps are already run in OS X with the use of an VM.
 
Last edited:
We have 4 iPhones in our family so I get the new one each year and pass down the last generation. So I will be going from the 5 to 5s. It will be interesting to see if the new chip handles the new operating system better than the 5. May not be any difference but thats something that hasn't been seen yet.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.