USB-C with Thunderbolt and OSX. Docks, mice, keyboards, drives, eGPUs and monitors stay on the desks.This is a legitimate gripe. It's time for Lightning to go and bring in USB-C - that's the courage I want to see.
Last edited:
USB-C with Thunderbolt and OSX. Docks, mice, keyboards, drives, eGPUs and monitors stay on the desks.This is a legitimate gripe. It's time for Lightning to go and bring in USB-C - that's the courage I want to see.
This is a legitimate gripe. It's time for Lightning to go and bring in USB-C - that's the courage I want to see.
I've been hooking my phone up to my car via the USB port for the last 8 years. So pot meet kettle?
It's about courage. And bravery. And being modern. And advancing.
And yet I am so glad that my iPhone has a headphone jack and my apple laptop has multiple USB ports!
Your Apple laptop that probably lacks:It's about courage. And bravery. And being modern. And advancing.
And yet I am so glad that my iPhone has a headphone jack and my apple laptop has multiple USB ports!
Why do you care? It ships with a dongle.
I don't know what Mac you have, but your Gen 3 iPad and Playstation won't take USB-C either, right?I don't care that they removed the headphone jack, I care that the replacement wired connector is proprietary.
If the iPhone had a USB-C or Thunderbolt connector instead of Lightning, I'd be all for it.
There are still good reasons to have wired headphones (or wireless with the ability to tether):
- Doesn't require any power
- No wireless signals (duh); I know some parents who insist their kids with wireless headsets listen tethered when not outdoors.
... but I'm never going to buy a pair of Lightning headphones, on principle. They won't work with my Mac, they won't work with my Gen 3 iPad, my Playstation, etc. I would happily buy a pair of USB-C plugs, though.
LOL, just an opinion. Maybe your glass is always half empty and people who are truly mad often have an aversion to change. Sound familiar to you?You mad?
[doublepost=1473301492][/doublepost]
You mad?
I really wouldn't call that neutral, it's obviously negative, as you pointed out in your lengthy post.In my opinion, this change is neither good nor bad. It's just neutral. Normally, a neutral change to the hardware wouldn't be a big deal. Apple could've switched wireless chip manufacturers for some minor reason. Who cares? Or they could've moved the camera from one corner of the top of the phone to the other corner. Meh. The discussion about the latter wouldn't have warranted more than one or two pages of discussion on here.
In this case, though, the neutral change (get rid of the audio jack, give people Lightning-to-3.5mm adapters) affects something many, many people use daily (namely: dirt-simple connection to existing headphones and other listening devices, which doesn't interfere w/ charging the phone). And these people get practically nothing in return.
If this had been a massively positive change, fewer people would be bitching about it. Free magical wireless earbuds w/ 12 hr battery life, which are wirelessly charged by the phone whenever the phone itself is charged? HELL YEAH. Alternately: if the reason for the removal of the 3.5 mm jack was to allow for some amazing new feature in the phone that the jack absolutely would not have allowed (none of the things the jack was supposedly getting in the way of were amazing, even taken cumulatively), people might've overlooked it.
Instead, the change is neutral. It's boring. There's no sexy component to it. It's not future shock--people aren't irritated because there's something new and interesting and disruptive happening, and they're scared of change. There is no damn change. It's nothing. And that's the problem, and Apple isn't sure how to spin it.
Heading to the shower with my Z3 compact playing my favorite classical now.Oh right, so I guess Sony are frigin technical geniuses then as they managed to make water proof headphone ports YEARS AGO!!!
If Apple are that inept at technical design, I highly suggest they hire some of Sonys mobile division engineers...
Or basically Apple is talking UTTER BS to give excuses for ditching the headphone jack which is far more likely..
Apple truely really are getting more and more arrogant and treating its customers with more and more contempt as the years role on.
Right!?!Has there been a solution yet for that problem: you can't charge your phone while you're listening to music with the lightning buds? No, I'm not talking about the $150 solution called the Airpods.
Can someone explain why I keep seeing this repeated over and over like it means something special in this context? DAC specifically means "digital to analog converter"-- so even the name means analog comes out. We look at digital photos with our analog eyes, we listen to digital music with analog ears, we use a digital thermometer to measure our analog temperature, I'm an analog kid on a digital forum... None of this represents a tear in the fabric of the universe or anything-- why do people keep saying it?Actually, once sound comes out of a DAC, it is analogue. All sound we hear is analogue:
https://paulsmithblog.wordpress.com/2014/11/27/24-bit-recording/
Maybe they don't?
http://www.consumerreports.org/smar...fails-consumer-reports-water-resistance-test/
[doublepost=1473289103][/doublepost]
All of this is setting up for next year. I think even the ceramic Watch is setting us up for a ceramic iPhone next year.
Changing your habits around using your operating system and app and entire ecosystem sounds like a lot of work just to save changing your habits around using a headphone jack.I hope this new iPhone will flop. Then they would realise it was a mistake to remove it. I'll be fine with my SE for a couple of years but after that I guess I'll have to get a Samsung or whatever still has a headphone jack.
So your issue is the fact that the jack is analog, not necessarily that the jack is there in the first place? Would you have been okay if Apple upgraded the jack to digital, but kept the old form factor? And maybe for a while the jack was backwards-compatible with analog listening devices, while the device-makers had time to upgrade the devices to digital?
Why do you care? It ships with a dongle.
I don't know what Mac you have, but your Gen 3 iPad and Playstation won't take USB-C either, right?
USB to Lightning is pretty straight forward-- I'd expect the eventual USB-C to Lightning to be much the same:
https://www.amazon.com/OriDecor-Lightning-Converters-Transfer-Compatible/dp/B01E93RBTG/
Small, and 5 for $9, 10 for $17.
I think it's the other way around. There needs to be a good answer for why to change other than "it's old". The wheel is an old technology... Time to replace it! Preferably with something digital!
Personally I have no objection to lightning connected headphones. I just need to charge the phone at the same time as having the headphones connected. I don't think that is a big request.
Wow. This one just never dies does it?
Unless you are an android, your ears can ONLY hear analog. This is not really a debate about digital vs. analog. Whether the sound comes out of a 3.5mm headphone jack or the adapter, it is analog when it gets to your ears. We cannot hear digital music without conversion to analog.
If you ARE an android, forgive me. But you are the exception... I think(better check the latest batch of memos).
And if pretty much ALL of you are androids, forgive me. No wonder there is such passion for this change. I'm unfortunately a lowly human with biological ears that can't hear the music delivered as a bitstream of 1s & 0s. Your offense at my personal opinions as a human consumer makes perfect sense to me now.![]()
That's the problem with Apple fan boys. They will try to justify this and yet a feature they suddenly said, it's something they can't live without. Silly little rabbit, trix is for kids, but in this case...the sheeps, I mean Apple fan boys.
[doublepost=1473300486][/doublepost]
You mad?
[doublepost=1473300603][/doublepost]
You mad?
Still don't understand why people are comparing this to things like the removal of the floppy disk and cassette players. Each of those things were replaced by better technologies. Ditching a wired technology with a wireless one isn't the same thing, but rather something that complements existing things. For example, Wi-Fi isn't a replacement for Ethernet, for without Ethernet, you generally wouldn't have Wi-Fi.
From the interview, it just sounds like Apple couldn't fix a supposed issue that they were having. Were they telling the truth, or was it lazy engineering? We'll never truly know.
There was literally nothing wrong with the 3.5mm jack.