A huge iMac-sized device with the productively prowess of iOS.Imagine a 12.9 inch iPad Pro which unfolds to an almost 26 inch device🤪
A huge iMac-sized device with the productively prowess of iOS.Imagine a 12.9 inch iPad Pro which unfolds to an almost 26 inch device🤪
On the one hand, Apple is rarely an early adopter of new technology, preferring to wait until the tech has matured to meet quality standards. The first iPhone had 2G Edge wireless when other phones were already on 3G.
On the other hand, I can’t understand the idea of such a large company playing the “or” instead of the “and”. In this case, work on OLED “or” foldable. This attitude is common in startups due to the size of the organization, but makes little sense for a billion (or trillion) dollar company.
This “or” phenomenon plays out where Apple will sidestep projects, for years, to focus on others. The result is always being years behind in one product or another. This played out horribly with a 7 year gap without a Mac Pro and plays out again with recent problems I’m not going to relist here.
My point is why doesn’t Apple focus on this basic business concept: the power of the “and”?
Imagine how obliterated the current flexible screen tech will be when subjected to hundreds of hours of pencil strokes.
I would agree with you because I think 4-6 years is definitely pushing it for current foldable devices. 2-3 years, not a problem. But 4-6 years I just don't see happening.I wonder about longevity; I routinely see 4-6 years. People keep iPads for a long time, a lot longer than iPhones...
First USB-C, then OLED! relentless innovation at its best.
Where have you been? The iPad has had USB-C for about 6 years.
So you are saying there is still a crease.Have you tried the OnePlus Open? I have it and you can barely notice and feel the crease. It has the best crease in comparison to the Fold5 and Google Pixel.
as they should. folding phones are gimmicks. all it does is sacrifice the UX of a very common use case to solve a minor use case problem.
How are larger screens that fit in your pocket a gimmick?
Samsung has had OLED displays in their tablets since 2014. Apple's sitting around, scratching their heads for years wondering how to accomplish it? It's not rocket science. My Samsung Tab S8 has a beautiful AMOLED display and cost me $250 in 2022 and included a free keyboard cover. Just had to trade in an old obsolete iPhone XR. You can bet when Apple gets around to it, it'll only be in the iPad Pro line and will be north of $1000.I’m also given to understand that much larger OLED displays that would be found on tablets and laptops and desktops are much harder to mass produce without issues than phone displays are.
OLED certainly isn't the future. It's an old technology with issues. Soon to be replaced by better Quantum Dot LED technologies.You thought it wrong.
The point was both "innovations" had been in competitors products for YEARS before Apple got around to it.Where have you been? The iPad has had USB-C for about 6 years.
Which company do you think provides the OLED panels that Apple would use on an iPad Pro?Samsung has had OLED displays in their tablets since 2014. Apple's sitting around, scratching their heads for years wondering how to accomplish it? It's not rocket science. My Samsung Tab S8 has a beautiful AMOLED display and cost me $250 in 2022 and included a free keyboard cover. Just had to trade in an old obsolete iPhone XR. You can bet when Apple gets around to it, it'll only be in the iPad Pro line and will be north of $1000.
It's no secret Samsung makes their own AMOLED displays. Not sure why that matters except for the fact that Apple can't keep it's outrageous profit margins with the pricier OLED panels without raising the iPad price even higher (which they know they may not be able to do without revolt). My point is, Samsung CAN produce affordable tablets and Apple should, by now, have OLED iPads as the technology is mature and panels are cheaper than 8 years ago. Again, not rocket science, but the bean counters and stockholders won't hear of it.Which company do you think provides the OLED panels that Apple would use on an iPad Pro?
Oh yeah, that’s right, it’s Samsung. And LG.
I guarantee you that if Samsung and LG had the guilds at the prices that Apple wants for large OLED displays eight years ago, they would have released more OLED products.![]()
Apple Orders OLED Panels for 2024 iPad Models From Samsung and LG Display
Apple has reportedly ordered OLED panels from LG Display and Samsung for its next generation of iPad Pro models, which are widely expected to arrive...www.macrumors.com
Exactly. OLED isn't magic anymore. OLED panels are in laptops in the $600-$700 price range now. And Apple still doesn't have an iPad with OLED yet.Bizarre thought - Nintendo, a company well known for achieving lower prices by often using older tech, adapted OLED before Apple, a company well known for having high prices (in part) because they tend to jump on newer tech.
Also, Nintendo did folding long before anyone else. I never owned a DS myself, but my understanding was most people felt their dual screen setup worked quite well (I heard some complaints about the touch screen being too small... but it was a 2004 device so excusable. The fact that the 2012 Wii U's touch screen was so bad was much less excusable.)
They’re likely going to be one of the first to implement the dual OLED display tech at scale.Exactly. OLED isn't magic anymore. OLED panels are in laptops in the $600-$700 price range now. And Apple still doesn't have an iPad with OLED yet.
Apple never gives us the best they could possibly deliver every release. Apple bread crumbs.What is taking them so long to bring something they have had on iPhone for years? I guess it’s really just about waiting for the prices of OLED technology to go further down to not get a cut in their big margins
they wasted time on dynamic notch and kept the same phone design for 4 years, what is time being spent on?I rather them not waste time on something that is a gimmick at best.