Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Cracked it!

The iWatch contains the antenna. Or maybe just an additional booster antenna?

The watch relays stuff to the phone over Bluetooth.

The watch comes bundled with the phone - hence the rumored $100 price hike for iPhone 6

Do you really want Apple deciding what kind of watch you wear? Why not just include black turtlenecks with cell phone antennas woven into the fabric? We all need to get that sci-fi vision where we all wear the same uniform anyway.:rolleyes:

The phone stops being a phone and interment data device if you are separated from the iWatch?

I can't see the antenna being separated from the "phone". If it is, then the iWatch is basically a wearable mifi device. One could save money by buying an iPod Touch with a VOIP app and use this iWatch for the cellular connection.
 
But since all iPhones have a glass front... what would prevent Apple from putting antennas beneath the glass on either side of the earpiece and home button?

It probably has something to do with the radio waves going directly into your brain if the antennas were facing you and transmitting out (through you, vs away from you).
 
This calls for a Jesus Facepalm...

Jesus%20Facepalm.jpg


Read my big post above. Curved displays are still being used today and are not new. Do not confuse a curved display with Samsung & LG's curved glass handsets.


thanks for actively clarifying this point in the thread... unfortunately, we will still have another 1500 posts of people flipping tables in anger due to an inability to read and comprehend
 
A Curved display would be helpful for placing a larger 5.5" iPhone 6 comfortably into the front jeans pocket.

If the only the outer glass is curved to wrap around the edges, this just seems like it would make break more easily when it gets dropped.

The article makes it sound like the display itself is curved, though – not just the glass cover of the display.

I think only the larger 5.5" iPhone 6 is getting the curved display, and thats why the reports of the curved display were conflicted.
 
I may switch away from Apple for the first time

I have owned a 3GS, 4, and now a 5. (I've owned Macs since the late 80s)

The 3GS was a great phone. I have no complaints.

The iPhone 4 was horrible with reception and keeping calls connected. It also had a hard time keeping WiFi signals in the same room other devices had no problem. Also, the lock button on the top and the Home button both broke after a little over a year.

I now have an iPhone 5. The lock button is completely broken. I have to use the little touch screen accessibility feature, which means I have this annoying graphic square floating over everything, now. Like the 4, it can't hold WiFi signals in rooms other devices can. I end up turning it off and using LTE in those rooms. The Hold button requires I press it 2-3 times before it works.

It's pretty obvious Steve Jobs is needed since the iOS 7 launch, because I'm pretty sure that garbage would not have gone out the door. The user interface is insane with the thin lined fonts and thin lines for buttons on top of pure white backgrounds. It's much harder to read, now. Apps seem to crash more often now too. It's not a huge deal because you just launch them again, quickly, but the quality control is not what Apple used to be. The voicemail system is buggy. When I listen to a voicemail up to my ear, my ear activates a button. It's not turning off the screen when I place it up to my head. Also, when I swipe the voicemail icon on my lock screen, it used to immediately play that voicemail and it would remember that I had it on speaker before. Not anymore. Even though the SPEAKER button is highlighted, it's going through the ear speaker. I have to press SPEAKER twice to get it to work. Speaking of highlights, the choice to have faint blue as a highlight makes it hard to recognize. Like I said, the user interface is horrible. Seriously, iOS 1.0 was much better in this regard. It just worked. Apple used to be about "it just works". Not anymore.

I'm really unhappy with the iPhone 5 experience. I like the form factor of the phone itself, but the OS and the quality control has me wanting to check out other options when my contract is up.

----------

Why is it when people think "Curved Glass", they assume it's for the display, which would have incredibly limited utility. Why don't they think about the more obvious use ... for the windows on the back of the phone!

We already know that aluminum will act as a Faraday cage, blocking signals from getting out, and that's why Apple used those glass windows on the back of the iPhone 5/5S. If they want a rounded back on the device like some of their other devices, they'll still need to have glass windows to allow wireless signals to penetrate the device. Curved glass would be perfect for that.

Why don't they use what they used for the 3GS? It worked great.
 
Please, not curved!

I think the greatest thing about the current iPhone design is that it is flat.

Despite Apple's hatred of screen protectors, the current design is the best ever for applying screen protectors! It means you can use the thicker, "rigid" type, and use them on both front and back.

I suppose all this nonsense with the sapphire is so that Apple can finally convince consumers not to use screen protectors.

I think the sapphire will still get scratched. And aluminum is quite soft and will just look like hell if you don't protect it. hard-anodizing helps somewhat, but then when it does get scratched, it looks even worse than without anodizing.

Those soft screen protectors you have to use on curved surfaces really suck.
 
The curved form will make flat phones look...flat and old. Flat is out, curves are in. They will look and feel better, have better cameras, better batteries and be...better. A hundred bucks more...they will simply make billions more $. People will clamor for these.

Future phones will be even more curvaceous. This is just a start. And about time actually. Remember years ago Apple supposedly bought curved glass machinery, but it was never used. They have been planning this for a long time.

Wouldn't be surprising if it did not happen until the iPhone 7.

In the future, the whole phone might be a sapphire. Bet that is already being worked out for iPhone X. Start saving.
 
If the iphone 6 does have a curved glass and rounded edges I would be the first in line! I've had an iphone for a long time and the exact same faceplate and similar form factor is getting old and boring! I also hope they do something about the aluminum/metal color.. the black aluminum from the iphone 5 was ugly and the space grey from the 5s is boring and lack luster. I think that a gold/champaign metal with a black faceplate would look so good!
 
So a $750 iPhone with 16GB of storage? Can't wait. :rolleyes:

If this would be the case, I'll jump ship, I promise.
In Italy that would mean a 799€ starting price.
Insane ....

----------

I never got why the antenna reception couldn't go through the front glass bezel, either above or below the screen.

The antenna is bidirectional, and you don't want an antenna transmitting right into your ears ... Trust me

----------

Probably would be better for one-handed operation on a large(r) screen.

----------



Your head interference?

Your head health ?

----------

And how thick is an iPhone?

The antenna is already close to your head. I feel like I'm already getting nuked!

Yes but it is transmitting in another direction than your head

----------

So basically it will take design cues from the iPad then. No surprise.

Well, not rounded glass on the iPad

----------

Any news about the iPhone 6 includes that "plus $100" rumor. Maybe it's Apple's way to slowly prepare customers for an increase in price.

I'm surely preparing myself to but the next Nexus in that case ...
 

Because Apple isn't going to force people to wear something on their wrist (or elsewhere) to drive reception for their cellphone. It would be a terrible move.

It COULD be included with new iPhones. But it definitely won't be required for your iPhone to function.
 
Not a fan of this recent "release all of the year's major products (iPhone/iPad) in the end of the year" trend. I like how they released a new iPhone in the summer with the new iOS installed on it.

Besides... camping outside your local cell phone carrier's store is much more pleasant in June than in October.

Yeah, sigh…..'deafening' peace and serenity, if not 'boredom', for the first nine months of the year, followed by information overload and perhaps indecisiveness of what to buy, for the last three months of the year.

I'm thinking Apple also would likely prefer it differently, but they rely on others for upgraded components to such a large extent, that this limits them in the timeframe of useful updates.
 
Presumably they will scrap the iPhone 4s and 5 and replace them with a 4" iPhone 6c in plastic, 4.7" iPhone 6s and 5.5" iPhone 6x both in aluminium. I can see the logic in that - 3 new models rather than just keeping the old models around with a cheaper price. I hear the carriers want to drop the subsidised handset model which would make an older iPhone with a high price look rather unappealing.
 
So a $750 iPhone with 16GB of storage? Can't wait. :rolleyes:
They said with carriers, that means the subsidized price not the unlocked price. Two different things. When's the last time you saw a contract for an iPhone have 650$ as the price?
 
I can't see the antenna being separated from the "phone". If it is, then the iWatch is basically a wearable mifi device. One could save money by buying an iPod Touch with a VOIP app and use this iWatch for the cellular connection.

That's an interesting idea.

Okay, How about the iWatch IS the phone. It has a speakerphone and bluetooth headset capability. Limited memory to store your contacts. Siri as the predominant iWatch UI with a smaller, limited functionality touchscreen. It could also have NFC wallet capabilities, health monitoring, and maybe even AppleTV remote capability: All the essentials never leave your sight. Never leave your wrist

The other part of the duo (the big, bulky flat thing that used to be called "iPhone") now becomes a tightly-coupled peripheral device that presents a "traditional" phone-sized screen for all your existing apps, their "traditional UIs" and bulk storage. It can mostly stay in your pocket or purse. It uses the iWatch's radios and data modems to connect itself (and all the old iPhone apps it hosts) to the cloud.

So I guess you're all going to complain about battery life now :)

Let me dream.
 
They said with carriers, that means the subsidized price not the unlocked price. Two different things. When's the last time you saw a contract for an iPhone have 650$ as the price?

I really hope this 100$ increase will be only for the subsidized price ...
 
The first iPhone had a plastic cutout... and the iPhone 3G and 3GS had a plastic back to allow the antennas to work.

The iPhone 4 and 4S had a glass back... and the iPhone 5 and 5S had a glass window for the antennas.

But since all iPhones have a glass front... what would prevent Apple from putting antennas beneath the glass on either side of the earpiece and home button?

On the bottom? Dock, speaker, microphone and headphones. On the top? Power button, camera, front camera, earpiece.
 
So a $750 iPhone with 16GB of storage? Can't wait. :rolleyes:

Well , in comparaison with the prices in my country , it's very cheap , When first released , The 5s costed 1220$ and the 5C costed 870$ , now the 5S is for 829$ (16GB) ( because Apple released it officially in my country ) and the 5c for 729$ (16GB) , so basically , for the price you are complaining about , you can get a 16GB iPhone 5c in my country ,:rolleyes: . That's why when I got my 5s for 1000$ (16gb) everyone told me I was crazy :p.
 
A curved display would be nice, but I can't see it offering any real benefit other than aesthetics. If anything it may make it harder to use the device, and that is something Apple aren't likely to do.

I'm thinking Apple would follow Samsung's approach with a curved screen. The Galaxy Nexus had a curved screen and while not very noticeable some believed it helped prevent scratches and glare.
 
But since all iPhones have a glass front... what would prevent Apple from putting antennas beneath the glass on either side of the earpiece and home button?

That's where the antennas are now, top and bottom. (The outside trim is only a ground plane piece.)

The antennas need to be able to receive and radiate in all directions. That's why there has to be radio transparent material on both sides.

I'm thinking Apple would follow Samsung's approach with a curved screen. The Galaxy Nexus had a curved screen and while not very noticeable some believed it helped prevent scratches and glare.

It does, plus it feels nicer sliding into a pocket. The slight curve also is nice against your face. (The straight candybar shape is inhuman.)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.