Yes. That's exactly the point I was making.As mentioned before - Mercedes is not dropping CarPlay - they just aren’t implementing the CarPlay 2.0 features that enable it to display more car functions such as climate controls, speed, etc.
Yes. That's exactly the point I was making.As mentioned before - Mercedes is not dropping CarPlay - they just aren’t implementing the CarPlay 2.0 features that enable it to display more car functions such as climate controls, speed, etc.
Tesla's software is pretty damn good... But outside of them I agree with you 100% car companies make some really crappy software.I won’t buy another car without CarPlay, no offense to those who would.
Sorry GM EVs and Tesla.
The problem is that most people don't really care lol... a bunch of tech nerds on an apple forum with their pitchforks out will not move the needle. Most people in john Q public who are shopping for a car could not care less about carplay or what's on their infotainment.... In fact a lot of people don't even know what carplay is.The only way to make manufacturers think twice before banning CarPlay from their cars, is voting with our wallets like you’re going to do. If other manufacturers see CarPlay enabled cars sell better, they might re-think their strategy.
GM and the other legacy manufacturers who abandon CarPlay better put some serious processing power into their in-house systems. That’s the biggest issue with the proprietary systems - they’re so, so underpowered and lack responsiveness.
Tesla and Rivian both have extremely responsive and (relatively speaking) powerful in-house systems…yet it’s still a major issue for some. Most people can at least tolerate not having CarPlay if the in-house systems are really good, but I highly doubt GM will do it. Probably gonna be super slow, laggy, and cumbersome to use.
Greed? So, a company that makes a car worth $100,000 wants subscriptions worth about $100 dollars (don't know how much the company earns through native subscriptions, throwing a random figure) is greedy. But a company that has contributed nothing to the building of the car wants to gather money through whatever means after selling $1000 device, is altruistic?
I am not faulting Apple here. I am trying to draw an analogy. When Apple ditched Google Maps, there were a lot of complaints. However, nobody complains now. Some even prefer Apple maps. Same will be the case with GM ditching CarPlay. There will be a hue and cry today, but when GM develops a good infotainment system, this will no longer be an issue.Are you intentionally ignoring the fact that people who still wanted to use Google maps could still download it and Apple just removed it from being the default? Personally I never had issues with Apple Maps but maybe because I live in the NYC metro area.
Whatever reasons Benz specified, are true for others too. They will not want to cede control of basic functions like HVAC, Odo meter, etc., It is just a matter of time before others bite the bullet. Just wait and watch.This is a wildly misleading statement. MB absolutely supports CarPlay across it's entire lineup and has made no indication otherwise about future models.
GM has 100% entirely blocked it from their current crop of EVs. These are totally different things.
Good for them. The fact that you paid Apple subscription should not matter to MB. AM is using MBs IP to play the music. Apple is fine with it.Everything I said is true, since I have a Mercedes and experienced it first hand. You need to pay Mercedes a subscription fee to use their apps. In the US, it's called "Online Music". And then you have to pay Apple to access the service. Until recently, you also had to pay for a third subscription for data.
Once, in a short term rental car. And it killed my battery. No thanks.Have you ever used it wireless? As in - hop into car and by the time you are ready to pull out of the parking spot, the phone is already connected with your maps going and showing possible destinations and your music / podcast is playing?
Just a comment to Beautyspin about all the responses you have received about your post… I think confusion was caused by using the word “also” in your post. That gives the impression that Mercedes is ALSO doing what GM is doing. In actual fact Mercedes is doing something quite different from GM. I know you know that, and your subsequent posts make that clear, but your initial post gives a different impression.Well, considering that Mercedes-Benz is also [bold added] not going to let CarPlay in, due to reasons specified by CEO Ola Källenius in the following interview, I doubt others would let CarPlay in too. Their reasons will apply to all the others too.
And they can shove ‘em up somewheres. As if owning a car from GM wasn’t already a PIA.The reason is GM wants to sell user data and monthly subscriptions.
I love having car play for my entertainment system because it does cross from my MacBook Pro and my iPad and I see all the things. I don't think I would want Apple taking over the entire dashboard.This is for CarPlay 2.0. As a consumer, we also wish to see first what added benefits we get by being able to control the A/C with Apple CarOS, or setting the Cruise Control with it. For now I'd prefer that the Merc controls the essential hardware and Apple plays me the songs I want to hear.
I have used CarPlay in 5 different vehicles, both wired and wireless. It has worked flawlessly for years. Maybe CarPlay isn’t the issue. Just saying…I got to use carplay in a Ford Edge a couple weeks ago, it's trash. Maybe they should fix that first?
I'm truly amazed at how many people say it's a good thing? That carplay randomly disconnected about a million times.
iphone 14 pro max up to date on software. I'm much happier with my everyday bluetooth link that works flawlessly.
This is what I saw on the website. However, it provides much more than just streaming your music. Not even comparable.Apple isn't gaining anything by connecting to your car. The $100,000 car company wants you to pretend you don't have a phone and pay for the car to do everything you want already do with the device in your pocket.
It's as simple as that. I already own the phone I already pay for the cell plan. I already pay for the music services I want to.
Carplay just lets me use them in the car. It's amazing how many people sit there and defend cars needing to be "another cellular device with a subscription".
There is zero incentive. I don't know a single car infotainment system that has every music service available. They have zero intention of ever supporting all services because they get kickbacks playing the exclusive game.
When any of the manufactures work with all the big services and don't have a monthly subscription then maybe we can have a discussion if it's better than using what you already have/pay for. Think that's unreasonable and no company will ever do it? Yeah I agree that's why Carplay is the answer.
Carplay 2.0 is a fun gimmick that has nothing to do with the conversation.
CarPlay is great when the software isn’t.I won’t buy another car without CarPlay, no offense to those who would.
Sorry GM EVs and Tesla.
Opposite for me. Don’t miss CarPlay that much since the Tesla software is so good already.I love my Tesla and didn't think that I'd miss CarPlay as much as I do. Everything's great but CarPlay is so much better.
This is one of my favorite things, too. I use my calendar to run my life. It's nice to just click and go.This decision has externals consultants written all over it: good idea on paper, terrible idea to implement. Even Tesla's own OS is terrible: the SatNav has no proper turn by turn; the music services cut out in tunnels, the integration with Messages is non-existent, etc.
Having said this, I am not keen on having the Apple aesthetic clash with the car interior, so if the app providers, including Apple apps, provide good APIs so that the apps integrate well on the GM OS, then this could be a way forward.
In the meantime, I love how Apple Maps fetches an address for an appointment from Calendar, sing my Contact list, and my Messages are all in one thread on my phone. (I share a car with my wife, so CarPlay also allows us to keep our Contact Lists, Messages, Music Playlists, etc separate)
I think the real gold mine that GM is trying to go after is data. How you drive, where you go, how you use the vehicle…every single piece of information they can hoover up to generate more revenue streams for themselves, or whoever they choose to sell the data to. That is why CarPlay was dropped.Instead, the automaker introduced a proprietary infotainment platform, aiming to control and customize the digital experience within its vehicles. This transition is part of GM's strategic pivot toward enhancing its software capabilities and establishing a stronger digital services revenue stream.
Can you imagine the back-and-forth if MR posts about “some users” experiencing strange/inconsistent behavior from their vehicle’s HVAC system when extended CarPlay is used?Whatever reasons Benz specified, are true for others too. They will not want to cede control of basic functions like HVAC, Odo meter, etc., It is just a matter of time before others bite the bullet. Just wait and watch.
Absolutely! My wife and I drive a Chevy right now and even though it has Carplay, we have just used the built in service just fine. But it isn't a subscription service. We just use it and it works! I will never pay for a service like this in my car that I already paid thousands and thousands of dollars for.It’ll be a cold day in hell before I buy a car that doubles as a live service.
I won’t buy another car without CarPlay, no offense to those who would.
Sorry GM EVs and Tesla.
I used wireless CarPlay on 3 vehicles so far (including my wife's Subaru that has it) and actively navigating over wireless with maps / traffic being downloaded takes about 7% of battery life per hour of navigation. This is (IMO) completely reasonable (and is of course higher than just playing music over Bluetooth).Once, in a short term rental car. And it killed my battery. No thanks.