Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I really don't see what all the fuss is about. This rumor came out and Apple went out of their way to deny it. It isn't true, stop worrying and enjoy your downloads.
 
Not surprised. They want to simplify how consumers access music, while paying a recurring monthly fee, and at a lower O&M cost to Apple. This Rumor aligns wel with Tim's management style.
 
This is an old trick. They release trial balloons to see what the public responses are and eventually implement it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smorrissey
Currently the iTunes Store has more music than Apple Music. Especially with classical, the entire Chandos label is absent from Apple Music, as is most of Hyperion, yet both are on the Store. Would eliminating downloads mean these would now be available in streaming or would they continue to be unavailable?

As I said, I prefer CDs for the quality, but I do sometimes stream for more casual listening, so this could be a factor if I considered getting Apple Music or a future "lossless" version of it.
 
What about songs that aren't available to stream?

Obviously that won't be a thing anymore...

It's only a thing now for some artists who want you to buy a whole EP or LP in order to get access to a single or few select songs.

If downloads are removed, it will force their hand. Or they'll just remove it from the Apple Music sphere all together.
 
I'll go somewhere else then. I'm not always on a network where I can stream, and don't always want to use my data plan to listen to music. What is one to do on a plane if they don't want to pay for an expensive WiFi plan? I doubt this will ever happen, but it's a stupid move if it does.
You bought a 16 GB iPhone and have not heard of offline playlists, correct? ;) Let me tell you from experience, it works great. No data, no WiFi... no problem. Time to break old anxieties people, move on. It's a better experience (for most people).
 
I normally use CD's and import to iTunes. My new car does not have a CD player, so I'd obviously have no choice but to go to Amazon to buy MP3's.

I wish Apple would definitively state that this rumor is false.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zyser
so this kills all iPods and ability to listen to music without burning data. terrible idea, cannot believe this would even be considered.
Burning data? People are so misinformed about streaming. Offline playlists people! It's so easy and you don't ever think about it once you figure out the way it works.
 
Come on, MacRumors......you're better than this. This is a 100% false click bait story. Digital Music News has zero credibility. This was proven last time when you and other sites made the mistake of using them as a source of news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
I'll go somewhere else then. I'm not always on a network where I can stream, and don't always want to use my data plan to listen to music. What is one to do on a plane if they don't want to pay for an expensive WiFi plan? I doubt this will ever happen, but it's a stupid move if it does.
You can download the music to each device if you want to, just like when it was Beats. I only stream on my Apple TV at home. All the music I listen to in the car or on the plane is downloaded to my phone from Apple Music.
 
This is a little concerning, but honestly I don't remember the last time I actually bought music on iTunes. But not for the reasons you'd think. I don't stream at all and don't care to. Mostly because of the quality of the music or the sporadic cell signal out in the middle of nowhere Kansas where I go sometimes. Or because I don't want to pay a monthly fee. I still buy good old fashioned CDs and import them to iTunes to sync to my iPod. Yup, I'm stuck in the 2000's and perfectly happy about it.

pMYWEfcl.jpg


I really can't believe they'd actually go through with it though. But this is a rumors site :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwkay
iTunes purchases gave an inexpensive incentive to own music legally rather than steal it. Rather than pirate music, for a buck, you could have a legal right to only the songs you wanted.

Some people do not want subscriptions. This will drive people back to torrenting.
What? Isn't the justification regarding movies that providing subscriptions like Netflix and other alternatives would stop piracy?
This will only drive to piracy people who are too cheap to pay $10. Keep making excuses. If you're going to torrent music just accept that it's wrong. If you don't agree with the industry's rules you don't play. Not make your own.
 
I welcome this. Go to Amazon if you want to live in the past.
As someone to embrace the future with open arms, I disagree. Have you thought that maybe I don't want to pay a rent or be on a contract with a service and maybe I want to own my stuff?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt and dk001
Come on, MacRumors......you're better than this. This is a 100% false click bait story. Digital Music News has zero credibility. This was proven last time when you and other sites made the mistake of using them as a source of news.
It's a 100% true story because it's inevitable. You think Apple is going to waste money running a music store forever?
 
.....
So far, I am still using itunes to manage my library (although I have purchased BeaTunes to manage iTunes). As this continues, I need to find a good tool to manage my music library. Any suggestions?
As a research suggestion : I ran Clementine only briefly in Linux Mint. It'd be worthwhile to at least check it out. When the time comes for me to organize a library outside of iTunes, I'll be revisiting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grahamperrin
I prefer to buy my music. Streaming is OK, but when their services are down, so is my music.

Or when you're on an airplane, on a cruise ship, or anywhere else where you have no Internet access.

Totally unacceptable.
[doublepost=1465399954][/doublepost]I refuse to pay Apple and then also pay Verizon for bandwidth to listen to MY music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwkay
Not really a big deal (you already don't "own" it when you purchase/download it from iTunes - or really any other means). Sure you can burn them when you purchase and you "can't" when you get it through Apple Music... but not much real difference to the masses here. If you burn then rip the cd back onto iTunes (removing the DRM) I believe that is technically pirating according to the iTunes EULA.

Now if they mean not being able to have an offline copy... I refuse to be forced to use an overpriced cellular data plan to listen to music on any platform.

If they eliminate importing as well, there are plenty of other "fish in the sea".

Would be very ironic to go back to carrying a phone -and- a media player all because of stupid decisions by the company that made that paradigm obsolete...


I think you're out of the loop--iTunes music downloads are DRM free and have been for years now. You own them. You can do whatever you want with them. You're not pirating if you burn to a CD and re-rip.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.