My vote? Don't mess with the current design. I like it. I don't want to go carrying that beast around with me, but it's roomy and easy to muck with the insides of, I've got space on top to stack peripherals, it's strong enough to feel reliable, there's plenty of ventilation so the fans spin slow and I don't worry about overheating...
Keep it.
I'm amazed how many people think it's "dated". It still looks good to me. That's one of the things I've always liked about that case-- it's timeless. The curvey G4 plastic cases look dated now, but the aluminum? Timeless...
8 cores does NOT mean 8 CPU's... There will still only be 2 CPU's...
Also 500 GB drives are VERY common these days... 2 of them don't take up much space...
Consumer TB drives are just around the corner...
Is the first page of comments too early to go careening off on a tangent? Oh well, can't help myself... Is there an official nomenclature now that things are going all multi-core? The nomenclature I've been seeing makes no sense to me... Here's my view of the world:
CPU: Central Processing Unit. There can't be more than one, because if there were it couldn't be central. This must therefore refer to the collection of processing units working cooperatively.
Core: a full and self sufficient processing unit. May be one of many on a single piece of silicon. Not all cores in a system, or on a single piece of silicon, need be identical.
Multi-core: containing more than one "core". May be on one or many silicon components. The Dual G5s were multi-core machines. The Quad Xeons are multicore.
Processor: seems to refer to the chip containing one or more processing cores, which must be interesting for those in the UK-- do you say "The processor are..."?
The processor/core thing has always felt nebulous to me... Multi-processing used to be the phrase used, then multi-core became the hip jargon. I still think people think in terms of what each processor is doing on a multi-core chip. It makes sense that this would be nebulous since it doesn't really matter... How many chips are used to carry all the cores is an implementation detail.
I'm kind of tired of hearing people bash each other over the use of nomenclature when I don't think that nomenclature is well established...
how and why would they push heat out the top!? In a large number of cases I find that people (including myself) place external hard drives and USB hubs and everything else on top of the machine.. it's so convenient. I can't see Apple routing the output up there... but we'll see
Ahhh... So you're the one I've seen peeking through my windows...
Heat out the top makes a lot of sense from a thermal management perspective, but it would suck for me-- I'd lose the shelf.