I think it’s optimistic to say that Apple has already ‘discovered’ AI. We shall see what they came up with at the WWDC, but I am not holding my breath, I doubt Apple will present something that can compete with GPT or Gemini.Excellent news. And Apple has been quietly moving into AI for some time now with Apple Silicon.
Crack me up those believing Apple just discovered AI.
The updates just announced for FCPX and Logic Pro are promising that Apple is starting to do something about being behind. They need to resurrect Aperture.New features in photo and video editing enhanced by AI will make iPhones and iPads and Mac even more irresistible.
I think they should rebrand it Jim, but with the following interaction rules:They need to kill the Siri brand. I learned to hate talking to “Siri” and never want to again.
Apple prefers doing buybacks and buying treasuries than actually improving software!Guys! Guys! Give Apple a break. It takes money to improve software. It takes money to hire & retain talented programmers to make great software. We all know that money has been in very short supply at Apple for the last decade or two...
Oh wait.
Well maybe if they charged 6-8X more for RAM & SSD than market... instead of only 3X-5X more.
Maybe if they ripped the Mac computing guts out of a 27" monitor, stopped including a keyboard and mouse in the box... but charged the same price for only what is left...
Oh wait.
Cut out the "Intel Premium" AND raise prices?
Oh wait.
Get rid of them costly stickers?
I'm at a loss. Perhaps if we started a gofundme???![]()
Not yet.nVidia's market cap exceeds Apple's. That could turn into an existential threat to Apple.
Tim Cook is a genius. When he took the reins from Jobs, Apple's market cap was $800 billion. Today, it's just south of $3 TRILLION. Tim is also now a billionaire, and heads one of the largest companies in the world. Is he a perfect CEO? No, of course not. But you can't name any CEO or human being who is. I'd bet you can't even come up with someone who would demonstrably do a better job of running a Fortune 5 company, either.This should have started at least 5-7 years ago. Then Apple might even be ahead now.
Tim Cook is the dumb brick.
Polish is easy. How about Siri being able to translate Aramaic, or Sanskrit, or maybe Hieroglyphics? Or breaking 256 bit encryption?Let them remember about Polish, I don't know if it's real that Siri finally may do understands something in my language![]()
People always use this argument, that we are not better than Tim Cook. But you don't need to be a chef to know that the food sucks. Customers can judge from the perspective of whether they are getting what they want, whether they are happy with the products, services, prices.Tim Cook is a genius. When he took the reins from Jobs, Apple's market cap was $800 billion. Today, it's just south of $3 TRILLION. Tim is also now a billionaire, and heads one of the largest companies in the world. Is he a perfect CEO? No, of course not. But you can't name any CEO or human being who is. I'd bet you can't even come up with someone who would demonstrably do a better job of running a Fortune 5 company, either.
Apple is a publicly held for profit corporation. America is a capitalist nation. What's your beef here?Addicted to the sweet App Store revenues and margins.
So that means they thought Siri was state of the art until ChatGPT came along? Would explain a lot but I am at a loss for words. If that was true, it would be like they were living in a walled garden where nothing remotely critical could reach them improving their „already perfect“ software/assistant.It took them several weeks to see what was wrong with Siri and made it antiquated?
Apple has been doing AI for years in other areas. Not LLMS but what Apple was calling Machine Learning which a smaller scale AI. They have been putting Neural Engine processors in their devices for the past 7 years. Lots of features on their apps are AI driven but not in an in-your-face kind of way. Last year they experimented with a Transformer AI (the heart of LLMs) in the learning predictive text suggestions.This should have started at least 5-7 years ago. Then Apple might even be ahead now.
Tim Cook is the dumb brick.
I guess that could be kind of fair. I still think there was a lack of foresight, but I am willing to wait and see. And I am rooting for Apple because I'm heavily invested in their products and services.Apple has been doing AI for years in other areas. Not LLMS but what Apple was calling Machine Learning which a smaller scale AI. They have been putting Neural Engine processors in their devices for the past 7 years. Lots of features on their apps are AI driven but not in an in-your-face kind of way. Last year they experimented with a Transformer AI (the heart of LLMs) in the learning predictive text suggestions.
AI is really just getting started as a consumer field and its not clear that early leads will win out in the end.
I imagine you would have achieved an AI that could pass the Turing Test in a week or two, in your spare time?John G. Hired years ago to improve Siri. Nothing to date. Craig & John just spent "weeks" evaluating AI chat. Based on this they realized Siri is behind. WTH. What were they doing in previous years?? I hope for the best, but am really concerned that Apple can no longer manage its way to excellence WRT software. Where is Forstall -- he might be the nicest guy, but he got a lot done ??