Mine is fast. I think these reports are fake.
Hopefully this problem is not based in the hardware. Seeing as the reports indicate that it may be a WEP2-specific problem, it seems to be software-related and can hopefully be fixed by an update from Apple.
Hi.
When I connect to my G network I have fast speeds all over the house.
When I connect to my N network the speed drops down to almost nothing.
Shouldn't the N be the fastest?
Something is clearly wrong.
My setting are exactly the same for both home networks. They are just running on separate antennas.
Don
What I understand is that for optimum performance the router should be configured for 801.11N @5GHz only. If used @2.4GHz you may get a lot of noise from nearby WiFi using same frequency. As I don't have a 801.11N network I would guess that also changing the channel (if there is such an option) would improve the situation. Finally if your router was made before October 2009 where the protocol was finalised, it may have not properly implemented it.To achieve maximum output, a pure 802.11n 5 GHz network is recommended. The 5 GHz band has substantial capacity due to many non-overlapping radio channels and less radio interference as compared to the 2.4 GHz band.[7] An 802.11n-only network may be impractical for many users because they need to support legacy equipment that still is 802.11b/g only. Consequently, it may be more practical in the short term to operate a mixed 802.11b/g/n network until 802.11n hardware becomes more prevalent. In a mixed-mode system, an optimal solution would be to use a dual-radio access point and place the 802.11b/g traffic on the 2.4 GHz radio and the 802.11n traffic on the 5 GHz radio.[8] This setup assumes that all the 802.11n clients are 5 GHz capable, which isn't a requirement of the standard. A technique called "band steering" is used by some enterprise-grade APs to send 802.11n clients to the 5 GHz band, leaving the 2.4 GHz band for legacy clients. Band steering works by responding only to 5 GHz association requests and not the 2.4 GHz requests from dual-band clients.[9]
[edit]40 MHz in 2.4 GHz
The 2.4 GHz ISM band is fairly congested. With 802.11n, there is the option to double the bandwidth per channel to 40 MHz which results in slightly more than double the data rate. However, when in 2.4 GHz, enabling this option takes up to 82%[10] of the unlicensed band, which in many areas may prove to be infeasible.
The specification calls for requiring one primary 20 MHz channel as well as a secondary adjacent channel spaced ±20 MHz away. The primary channel is used for communications with clients incapable of 40 MHz mode. When in 40 MHz mode, the center frequency is actually the mean of the primary and secondary channels.
Same here. We have 5 iPhone 5's in the family an the issue seems to be staying connected to the 5Ghz band. When connect it shows weak signal, is slow and disconnects quite easily. Don't notice as much issues on a 2.4GHz band and the connection seems more solid and doesn't drop.My experience with the iPhone 5 on my home network has shown me that I'm fine when connected to 2.4ghz but on the 5ghz side of things sometimes it doesn't show a connection or it'll drop the connection while my desktop which is connected to 5ghz remains connected, strong and steady.
No slowing, just unavailable at times. The times I am connected the signal as just as strong as the other devices on my network.
Hope this helps.
Hmmm.
Here's what I can see.
I have my N network broadcasting at 5 and my G network broadcasting at 2.4.
I have some older devices in the house that are G only and several newer devices that are N capable.
That's why I'm running both at the same time.
Am I doing something wrong?
Don
are we holding it wrong?
This and the tiresome "Steve would never allow", which crops up every couple of pages are the sign of a mind devoid of any original thought.
Ran Speedtest three times - 1st on AT&T HSPA+, 2nd on LTE, 3rd on WiFi through Comcast xfinity (20 Mb). WiFi via WPA2 is a little slower than on my iPad 2, and half as fast as my MacBook Air.
Image
Not necessarily. According to Wikipedia