..And this is from neither, it shouldn't be taken as fact. All I was implying that rumors aren't for certain.
I know, I was just agreeing with you and elaborating.
..And this is from neither, it shouldn't be taken as fact. All I was implying that rumors aren't for certain.
and Google, Amazon ... all offer 7" tablets with FullHD resolution
Speaking of Amazon, the U.S. press has given its verdict on the Kindle Fire HDX 7: thanks to the ecosystem developed by Amazon, the Kindle tablet can rival with the Nexus7 and surpass it in terms of power ( Snapdragon800 at 2.2Ghz, 2Gb RAM, Adreno 330, FullHD screen insensitive to reflections ...):
http://www.techhive.com/article/205...ew-third-times-the-charm.html#tk.twt_techhive
http://www.slashgear.com/amazon-kindle-fire-hdx-7-review-01299910/
http://www.engadget.com/2013/10/02/amazon-kindle-fire-hdx-review/
http://www.slashgear.com/amazon-kindle-fire-hdx-7-review-01299910/
I was hoping to get a mini for my girlfriend this Christmas.
Bogus!
Apple has no problem making a 4" retina display for iphone.. No proble making a 9.7 inch retina display for ipads...but they hav a problem with making a 7.9 diplay.
Yup 7.9 is a very challanging size to make ... Lol ...
This exactly. The whole purpose of a mini is it's portability. The thinness and lightness of the current iPad mini combined with the new iOS7 is second to none.
I just couldn't bare the weight of the Nexus 7 despite the higher resolution. No doubt, the screen is nice and I don't mind android too much either, but due to the added heft of the Nexus 7 I'd rather be using my iPad mini.
It's just that hard for an iPad mini user to trade significant weight and size for higher resolution.
That's exactly how I read the situation as well. Apple was ready to roll out another standard def mini with minor updates(A6) around this time, but the competition,which was already ahead display wise, REALLY up'd the game with latest nexus 7.
That caused Apple to have to regroup and has caused this apparently delay/lack of raw materials to meet demand. If you read the stories about the updated Nexus 7, and it's design/production, it sounds a lot more Apple like than our guessed at original meager update for the mini
I currently own an iPhone 5. I don't consider my phone just "good enough". Please don't compare the 5 with the iPad mini.
I wouldn't consider a high res display "leap frogging". The competition isn't revolutionizing the tablet space. They're making iterative improvements just like Apple.
Doesn't need double the res to be retina, it's like 85% there already. And for most folks looks damn good. Doubling the resolution would be a major power drain. The A7/M7 combo may not be efficient enough to handle the additional need.
And THAT, not some supply issue BS is why we won't get a retina mini if that is what happens.
It would be the same resolution (number of pixels) but would have a higher ppi (pixels per inch)
iPad mini is currently 163 ppi at 1024x768 resolution on a 7.9 inch screen
iPad 2 is currently 132 ppi with the same 1024x768 resolution on a 9.7 inch screen
iPad 4 is currently 264 ppi at 2048x1536 resolution on a 9.7 inch screen
an iPad mini with retina display of 2048x1536 resolution on a 7.9 inch screen would have 324 ppi (about the same as iPhone) so actually a much "better" screen than a full size iPad (unless iPad 5 goes to 4096x3072, but that is just silly)
I don't think that Steve would have released a non-retina iPad a year after introducing the iPad 3. I'm assuming you're basing your comment on a vague statement Tim made a year ago about Steve's view on a smaller screen size. Nothing was said about resolution. And no, the rumour that Steve set in to motion the product pipeline for the next few years doesn't really mean anything as realistically many of the products would have been revised since then, especially when running in to engineering challenges.
It doesn't take a genius to determine Apple got cheap to drive up its profits.
What, that the mini 2 will have 4th gen iPad specs?
and Google, Amazon ... all offer 7" tablets with FullHD resolution
Speaking of Amazon, the U.S. press has given its verdict on the Kindle Fire HDX 7: thanks to the ecosystem developed by Amazon, the Kindle tablet can rival with the Nexus7 and surpass it in terms of power ( Snapdragon800 at 2.2Ghz, 2Gb RAM, Adreno 330, FullHD screen insensitive to reflections ...):
http://www.techhive.com/article/205...ew-third-times-the-charm.html#tk.twt_techhive
http://www.slashgear.com/amazon-kindle-fire-hdx-7-review-01299910/
http://www.engadget.com/2013/10/02/amazon-kindle-fire-hdx-review/
http://www.slashgear.com/amazon-kindle-fire-hdx-7-review-01299910/
This exactly. The whole purpose of a mini is it's portability. The thinness and lightness of the current iPad mini combined with the new iOS7 is second to none.
I just couldn't bare the weight of the Nexus 7 despite the higher resolution. No doubt, the screen is nice and I don't mind android too much either, but due to the added heft of the Nexus 7 I'd rather be using my iPad mini.
It's just that hard for an iPad mini user to trade significant weight and size for higher resolution.
Just because some analyst says it doesn't make it so. Remember the "grotesquely low" supplies of the iPhone 5S right before they went on to sell more than ever the opening weekend?
It would be the same resolution (number of pixels) but would have a higher ppi (pixels per inch)
iPad mini is currently 163 ppi at 1024x768 resolution on a 7.9 inch screen
iPad 2 is currently 132 ppi with the same 1024x768 resolution on a 9.7 inch screen
iPad 4 is currently 264 ppi at 2048x1536 resolution on a 9.7 inch screen
an iPad mini with retina display of 2048x1536 resolution on a 7.9 inch screen would have 324 ppi (about the same as iPhone) so actually a much "better" screen than a full size iPad (unless iPad 5 goes to 4096x3072, but that is just silly)
You're mistaken, I think. Let's say the iPad Mini doubles its PPI to 326. To stay a 7.9" screen, it will need to be 2048 X 1536. If you keep the # of pixels the same while doubling the PPI, the screen would have to be 1/2 as big. PPI = Pixels Per Inch.
How hard can it be? They put it in the iPhone, iPod, full size iPad and the MacBooks...
WWSD
What would Steve do?
You realize the N7 2013 is lighter than the iPad Mini, right?
http://www.gizmag.com/ipad-mini-vs-nexus-7-2013/28450/
Interesting that Amazon is charging $40 increments for the same memory capacity bumps that Apple charges $100 for.
Exactly Steve would do exactly whatever you think he would do.This is what Steve was good for. He would of told his team to buckle down and make it happen. Next year would not have been good enough.
Then again Steve wouldn't have released a non-retina iPad mini in the first place.
Edit: yes I'm aware that the iPad 1-2 didn't have a retina display, I meant releasing a non-retina iPad in 2012 after the iPad 3 was already introduced.
And yes I knew I would get flamed for the "Steve would have" comment. I was half joking but you have to admit that Tim likes to take the easy way out more often than not.