Umm... the rumours are for a redesigned model with a retina display plus the old Macbook Pro model with no retina.
We will find out soon enough though.
I was just going by what i've read today but yes i think that's more than likely too.
Umm... the rumours are for a redesigned model with a retina display plus the old Macbook Pro model with no retina.
We will find out soon enough though.
I said to myself beforehand that we will either see a resdesign or Retina. It looks to be the latter, and there's no other reason for them to make a MBP announcement at WWDC unless they didn't have something fresh in store for us, that's the least we can gather.
Now I can't say with certainty whether Retina will be standard or BTO, we'll find out soon enough.
As an AAPL investor, I don't like what I'm hearing lately. Three different lines of macbooks, rumors of an iPad mini - this kind of balkanization is exactly what drove Apple to near-bankruptcy in the 90's. With the MacBook Pro/Air, you serve two different needs - portability/affordability in one, and features/expandability in the other. How do you market the retina display line separately from the MacBook pro? Both address the same group of consumers. If they insist on keeping the traditional Macbook Pro, make the retina display a high-end option, rather than making another line entirely.
Dave
the high-end model is said to be exceeding the equivalent of $4000 in some countries.
It will take a while before Thunderbolt becomes totally widespread. TB may be faster, but USB 3 is everywhere so it would be a little stupid to ignore it. Besides, if Macs get updated to Ivy Bridge, it has a USB 3 controller built-in, correct? How difficult would it be for Apple to change the USB 2 ports it has now to 3?
Maybe I'll buy a 17" MBP retina in 5 years when my 2011 13" MBA is 6 years old.![]()
thunderbolt is getting more mainstream. computex had shown quite a few laptops with thunderbolt.
if the mac doesn't get ivy bridge, it no point getting a new one.
and yes, with a native controller, there is no excuse for not having 3.0
As an AAPL investor, I don't like what I'm hearing lately. Three different lines of macbooks, rumors of an iPad mini - this kind of balkanization is exactly what drove Apple to near-bankruptcy in the 90's. With the MacBook Pro/Air, you serve two different needs - portability/affordability in one, and features/expandability in the other. How do you market the retina display line separately from the MacBook pro? Both address the same group of consumers. If they insist on keeping the traditional Macbook Pro, make the retina display a high-end option, rather than making another line entirely.
Dave
Settle down, Beavis. I started programming on the Apple IIGS, had a Mac SE, and stayed with the Mac all the way through the horrid times. I also ran computer clusters full of Macs for years during the '90s. So yes, I do have a pretty good idea of why Apple Computer was in the state it was.All I can say is I'm glad you don't run the company! Frankly you don't understand why Apple was in the condition it was all those years ago when Steve took over nor why he had to so drastically trim the product line. Today Apple is to large to support itself on such thin product lines. They really need hardware that appeals to more and more users.
Before the Apple store went down, upgrading a MBP to a 512 SSD was a $2100 Build to order option. A $4000 top of the line model is not out of the question...
I just hope the parts are user upgradable...