Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Retina MacBook Pro Can Run Three External Displays Simultaneously
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Lots of people need to run 3 external displays. e.g.: financial analysts, CAD engineers, and any truly serious web developer. And, in fact, my grandma was just asking about this the other day!
This is probably why Apple feel the Mac Pro didn't need a major revamp. Previously if you wanted more than 2 displays, you had to go with a Mac Pro, then buy extra graphics cards. Having a third monitor is HUGELY productive for programmers, and a lot of them (myself included) will now look at the RetinaBook as a good replacement for ageing Pro towers.
I myself will be buying one in a couple of months to replace both a Mac Pro (2009 model, bought in 2010) and a (2011) MacBook Air.
I myself will be buying one in a couple of months to replace both a Mac Pro (2009 model, bought in 2010) and a (2011) MacBook Air.
Adding three extra displays, including two ACDs, increased the number of pixels powered by the rMBP by 6%.
Or 202%.
Retina Display 2880*1800 = 5,184,000 pixels
iMac as Display 2560*1600 = 4,096,000 pixels
iMac as Display 2560*1600 = 4,096,000 pixels
HDMI Display 1920*1200 = 2,304,000 pixels
This totals to 15,680,000 pixels. In other words, the rMBP is pushing out 302% compared to it's native resolution or an extra 202% more pixels on top of the retina display. All kidding aside, that is pretty damn impressive.
Last edited:
Not when you think about the video editors who rely on the PCI-E interface and the extra three internal storage spaces.
seriously? lol spec - wise (read : performance) there are certainly superior windows laptops, aside from the screen itself. Apple's advantage has always been battery life, not raw power.
My only wish from apple is higher end video cards. Great you can run 4 screens, what about 3d applications?
Wow that is crazy. Please make a 13" version Apple!
13" Retina Display (2560x1600, with scaling modes like the new MBP)
Discrete graphics chip (something lesser than the 15" to save power)
6 hours battery life (Due to smaller battery size from the smaller casing)
Starting at $1499.
Either that, or stick an IPS panel in the MBA's.
13" Retina Display (2560x1600, with scaling modes like the new MBP)
Discrete graphics chip (something lesser than the 15" to save power)
6 hours battery life (Due to smaller battery size from the smaller casing)
Starting at $1499.
Either that, or stick an IPS panel in the MBA's.
Can you define a "truly serious web developer" ?
I believe there are many "serious web developers" developing on 13" notebook screens just fine.
I run two displays at work, but any more and it would be a little overwhelming. Then again I'm not watching the stock market. I also know plenty of companies running websites etc. without the need for three monitors.
It would be handy to see a simplified how-to for folks with each grade of MacBook.
Ie, MacBook Air or 13" MBP you can hook 3 HD displays using XYZ wires. I would simply like to have one display be oriented vertically for web browsing. I for one would use the extra screen real estate for financial research or CAD stuff.
Being able to do it on a Book brings back the dock or go meme.
Rocketman
Ie, MacBook Air or 13" MBP you can hook 3 HD displays using XYZ wires. I would simply like to have one display be oriented vertically for web browsing. I for one would use the extra screen real estate for financial research or CAD stuff.
Being able to do it on a Book brings back the dock or go meme.
Rocketman
Mad Mac Maniac
macrumors 601
Agreed. I'm still ticked off that I can't use my 2011 iMac as a screen for my Xbox... or even my Macbook.
Not to mention the severe lack of peripherals supporting the port and the outrageous expense of the cord itself... *grumble, grumble*
I have a new air on order. Could anyone please explain how to do this. The lady at the apple store said that it could not be done, but she did not seem very knowledgeable on a number of items. I am fairly new to Macs and I appreciate anyone's advice.
Between this kind of capability and being able to rig the MBPr into native resolution, I think my mind is made up. While Windows machines are usually more powerful for the money, the thin form factor and OS are what wins me over. The MBPr is better specced then my full tower gaming PC (2.5 Ghz i7, 4GB RAM, Radion 5770), and that PC already runs all my games at max details.
lol. You can get a Windows 7 laptop for half the damn price of that $2800 Macbook, and yet the Windows 7 one will still destroy the Mac in power. What a joke with Apple's pricing. But the sheep will be sure to eat it up as always...
Film Composer, Filmmakers.
When I run Logic Pro (music software) 1 monitor runs the movie I'm scoring. Another monitor runs the mixer window and a third monitor runs the arrangement window.
I would LOVE a 4th monitor to just view open plug-ins.
that's how the PRO / content community rolls ;-)
Math fail...
Really smartguy?
The retina display powers 5,184,000 pixels. The max it can put out is 15,680,000 pixels. Or, it can put out an additional 10,496,000 pixels beyond the retina display.
10,496,000 / 5,184,000 = 202%. It can put out 202% more pixels. Just like I said.