I think this will get you started https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1142028/
Thanks. Its a goldmine of info.
I think this will get you started https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1142028/
his comment aint even valid on any kind of fermi or kepler. tell that to the people that oc the 580m to the 560 ti levels, including voltage bump
Ok it took me a couple of days worth of testing and researching to get these results with my cMBP non retina (check my sig).
Maximum stable overclock from 775Mhz/2000Mhz to 1150Mhz/2350Mhz. These clocks are 100% stable, not just benchmark stable... stable stable.
Temps never exceed 86 deg C (up from about 82 deg stock) and it doesnt downclock at all. I lapped my heatsink (wet sand 400grit>600grit>1000grit>3000grit>notebook paper> microfiber cloth...I could see myself in it) , changed to AS Ceramique 2, and fiddled with the Luddo's fan control but the fans still scale, they arent at 100% all the time
To double check this I ran intel burn test (very high) and furmark at 1680x1050 8x MSAA concurrently for 4 hours straight with the Nvidia inspector log/graph going... didn't once downclock although it did downvolt a few times from .95 to .90 (I wish we had voltage control on these things) and no artifacting (at least that I saw). Immediately after the 4 hour burn test I ran 3dmark 11 back to back 3 times, the final score was 3153, thats up from 2251 at stock or a 28.7% increase. This is in the upper range of GTX 670m's and well beyond a GTX 660m.
Well I am impressed![]()
I am convinced that with a few more modifications this thing could best a GTX 675m, having voltage control is a start. Cooling is the next thing, I got the best thermal compound I could find locally but there is better stuff out there, you could also use thermal adhesive and attach some low profile ram sinks to the vram (might be tricky to fit). You could take the bottom plate to a machine shop and have them mill some slots in right below the fan intakes... those things would drastically improve cooling, that combined with voltage control (or at least the ability to disable downvolting) would make this an overclocker's wet dream.
now to go do some serious gaming!!
Anyone still here?
I've pushed my GPU to 1150/2350, however whenever I run benchmarks, the core clock drops down to 786. Why is this?
I had no artifacts from increasing the core clock and only received artifacts when going to 1000 on the memory increase. 950 was perfectly fine and no artifacts. Im sure if I figure out how to pass the software limitation of MSI afterburner, the GPU can handle higher than the 135 increase for the core clock.
My final stable overclock was 1035/1729, up from the original of 900/1254. One would think temps would go up alot with this type of overclock, but mine only went up by 1C to a max of 78C for the GPU.
With this overclock, I was able to achieve a 3dmark11 score of 2860. This is nearly a 27% increase over the previous score and higher than a stock GTX660m. I couldnt believe how far this card can be pushed.
http://i1161.photobucket.com/albums/q509/jakubp12/1035core1729mem.jpg
Hy guys!
I need a little help.
A tired to overclock my rMBP but every time I set the inspector, to a higher (or different configuration than the stock) setup, it doesn't change the gpu core speed. The memory changes but then goes back to stock.
Do you guys have any idea?
"The only difference, was that to get into P2, I had to type in nvidiaInspector.exe -forcepstate:0,1 instead of 0,2."
I have a feeling this is your answer. Change it to 0,1