More drivel. You're only replying to argue semantics, because you have nothing to else To contribute. All your posts are continuous forms of nonsensical responses. It's evident you won't participate in discussion for the sake of making actual worthy arguments about statements you made yourself about Samsung and you never answer questions posed to you. As someone else alluded to, you have been debunked numerous times and for some odd reason, you feel the need to reply with nothingness.
You are being a bit defensive. Do you work for Samsung or something?
[doublepost=1510271157][/doublepost]
You really can't admit when you are wrong, can you? Your "obvious flaws" argument has been completely defeated, yet you have no comments about it. I really don't think you understand what we are talking about here. You just chose the wrong click-bait headline to throw into this argument without really understanding it so have no way to further discuss.
I didnt write the story, Gizmodo did. Do you want me to supply you with a Gizmodo contact email address? Maybe you can argue it out with them?