Reverted to Tiger from Leopard

[clevin]

guess you havent heard of the blue screen if you use an unsanity product....which is software and causes a conflict

which blue screen? did you ever see one yourself? please, holding a 8 years old problem, how mature. didn't see people bragging about mac os classic now, right?

No, no, no. If Apple had a Vista, it wouldn't have seeded 10.5.2 to developers, let alone release 10.5.1 to the public.

Look, Microsoft hasn't even released SP1 for Vista publicly yet and it's almost been a year.

Most Leopard bugs will probably be ironed out by around April.

apple's 6 months is M$'s one year, after all, M$ put out only two system when apple managed 5.

 

[heatmiser]

No, no, no. If Apple had a Vista, it wouldn't have seeded 10.5.2 to developers, let alone release 10.5.1 to the public.

Look, Microsoft hasn't even released SP1 for Vista publicly yet and it's almost been a year.

Apple and MS operate on different time scales; this isn't new. Vista will be the current Windows OS for at least 2 more years. I doubt people Apple will still be touting 10.5 in 2010. It's a lot easier to develop new operating systems when you have a monopoly on which hardware it will support.

Most Leopard bugs will probably be ironed out by around April.

Maybe. Maybe not. In either case, if you're going to give Apple 6 months to get things right, you should give MS at least 12, if not 18, due to the scaling differences.