It's important to note, however, that these longer lengths require active cabling in order to maintain the full 40 Gbps bandwidth and 100-watt charging maximum of Thunderbolt 3, but that also prevents compatibility with USB 3.1 and USB 3.0 standards. As a result, it's best to stick with the 0.5-meter cable that has full backwards compatibility if you can, even if it means rearranging your desk to get the dock close enough to your computer.
If so, this would be the first dock on the market to support two 4K USB-C monitors over a single Thunderbolt 3 cable
Your old MacBook Pro didn't have a UHS-II SD Card reader, it didn't have digital optical out, it didn't have a display port it didn't have native audio in nor did it have Thunderbolt 3. So you feel a little better now?
Thanks for the link. That's been tried a few times (see the Mac Accessories sub-forum) and it doesn't seem to work unfortunately.I mention this only as a curiosity (I'm skeptical) but, on page 22 of this document they say that a USB Type-C to DisplayPort adapter cable "must be reversible, works in either direction; four lanes of DisplayPort" - which would suggest that you could get a USB-C to DP cable and string it between the dock's DP1.2 output and the USB-C input on a 4k USB-C displah ("reversible" probably just means that the USB plug must work either way up, but they say "works in either direction" as well...)
Er said:mini[/I] DisplayPorts (doubling as TB2 ports) and HDMI. Thunderbolt 3? No, but it had TB2 and most TB3 devices will work with an adapter (and big boys don't cry about needing dongles, right?) It also had a SD-card reader - maybe not UHS-II (but since that has cropped up in the iMac Pro who's to say what an alternative-universe 2017 update of the old rMBP design might have had?)
A lot has been sacrificed for the sake of replacing 20Gbps TB2 with 40Gbps TB3 - like the ability to plug in 2 external displays, a high-speed TB2 hard drive, an external keyboard, a USB thumb drive, and SD card, a digital surround sound system and a charger without needing a hub/dock/multiport adapter.
Soooooooo anyone wanna buy my OWC Thunderbolt 3 dock? LOL
Now what to do with my Belkin? Hmmm..
I don't get it, why go with DisplayPort over Mini DisplayPort if this is targeted at Mac users? I feel the majority of us have Mini DisplayPort adapters for DVI, VGA, HDMI etc since that was the Apple standard for so many years. I've literally never seen anyone use or need DisplayPort, what a weird choice. Why make a dock this good with everything else and then throw in a port that I really doubt hardly anyone will use? An HDMI port would've at least made sense over DisplayPort, but a Mini DisplayPort would've at least been way more helpful for way more people.
I don't get it, why go with DisplayPort over Mini DisplayPort if this is targeted at Mac users? I feel the majority of us have Mini DisplayPort adapters for DVI, VGA, HDMI etc since that was the Apple standard for so many years. I've literally never seen anyone use or need DisplayPort, what a weird choice. Why make a dock this good with everything else and then throw in a port that I really doubt hardly anyone will use? An HDMI port would've at least made sense over DisplayPort, but a Mini DisplayPort would've at least been way more helpful for way more people.
Every year I have to remind you two about my birthday ...
Sorry for the simpleton question but I was wondering if this DP will work with my original Apple 27" Cinema Display which appears to have a mini display port connector (not the newer thunderbolt but the original 27" model). If so is the adapter included or is it a fairly trivial dumb dongle I can get anywhere for cheap? I have the latest 15" MBP and would later this year upgrade my old 27 display with one of those ultra wide curved thunderbolt ones that came out this year but will need it to work with what I have for the time being.
Ugly? Yes but who cares. No box stuffed full of cables is ever going to look pretty.Af far as features and functions are concerned, very impressive.
But the design, oh boy. Port layout is a mess and it looks looks like a $50 box.
You got it back to front. He didn't say all the ports on this box were on his old Mac. He said all the ports on his old Mac are on this (which also may or may not be true).Caldigit's customer service is par none, you have a inconvenience or an exchange but not a problem. They've always done right by me!
[doublepost=1517335828][/doublepost]
Your old MacBook Pro didn't have a UHS-II SD Card reader, it didn't have digital optical out, it didn't have a display port it didn't have native audio in nor did it have Thunderbolt 3. So you feel a little better now?
B&H does seem to be offering the $250 promotional preorder pricing after all! Now to sell this OWC Thunderbolt dock since this CalDigit seems to be about perfect for my needs...
It's good to see CalDigit has responded in a big way to the criticisms of its earlier TS3 dock, and unfortunately for you, eSATA ports were apparently not high enough on the list of must-haves for many people.Lack of eSATA ports is a deal breaker.
I don't get it, why go with DisplayPort over Mini DisplayPort if this is targeted at Mac users?
You're kidding, right? Look again - the port alignment is all over the place. If it works, then I guess that's all that matters for most people. But to say it's gorgeous when clearly it has design issues is to miss something important to Apple users. Imagine Apple putting something out like this - we'd think standards had slipped in the design department.And it’s thin and gorgeous.
I kinda agree with you (as the owner of many MiniDP-to-VGA, DVI and HDMI dongles) but I think the answer is that it isn't just targetted at Mac users.
As some consolation, pretty much every decent display I've bought at home or work - other than the Apple 27" Cinema display (which is a pain) - has come with a full-sized DisplayPort cable.
However, my attitude toward dongles that stay tucked behind a dock on the desktop is considerably less negative than toward dongles that you have to carry around with a laptop...
And as for DisplayPort (generally) over HDMI - DP probably offer the widest compatibility, with adapters to HDMI, DVI and VGA available.
It's good to see CalDigit has responded in a big way to the criticisms of its earlier TS3 dock, and unfortunately for you, eSATA ports were apparently not high enough on the list of must-haves for many people.
Personally, I'm particularly happy about having at least one USB-C port 3.1 gen II enabled, if for no other reason than file manipulation of my two 1TB Sammy SSDs and some future proofing, considering the prices of these docks.
And as a photographer, I'm super happy about the included and UHS-II enabled SDXC card reader. I will almost certainly buy this dock, even though I wish CalDigit would have spent a little more attention to the aesthetics and fit-and-finish of the enclosure.
Surely all the Tyoe-A ports on this dock (according to their picture diagrams that contradict the text specs above!) state they are type-A Gen.1 (i.e. 5 Gbit)? Confusing.Key Features
In The Box
- 15 Ports of Connectivity
- Charge laptop - 85W
- 2x Thunderbolt™ 3 Ports
- 1x SD 4.0 Card Reader (UHS-II)
- 4x USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 1
- 1x USB 3.1 Type-A Gen. 2
- 1x USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1
- 1x USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 2
- 1x DisplayPort
- 1x Digital Optical Audio (S/PDIF)
- 1x Gigabit Ethernet
- Connect Dual 4K Monitors
- Analog Audio In/Out
- Compatible with Mac & Windows
Additional Information
- TS3 Plus Dock
- Power Supply Unit (PSU)
- Power Cord
- Thunderbolt™ 3 Cable (0.5m)
- 2x Rubber Feet Strips
**Get a Free 1 Year Warranty Extension when you buy the TS3 Plus direct from CalDigit.
- 1 Year Warranty
- Lifetime Phone/Email Support
Visit http://www.caldigit.com/warranty-extension/after your purchase to claim your free 1 Year Warranty Extension. T&C Apply.
can someone at MR actually clarify (or anyone else here confirm) that buying this with the 1 or 2 metre cables from the CalDigit's store would still offer USB 3 (5 or 10 Gbit) speeds, as surely the dock itself has a controller for dealing with this, so the cable length here is irrelevant?
...finally a dock that sounds pretty good. (at least on paper – we'll have to see actual performance before we can agree it really is, of course! ;-)
You're kidding, right? Look again - the port alignment is all over the place. If it works, then I guess that's all that matters for most people. But to say it's gorgeous when clearly it has design issues is to miss something important to Apple users. Imagine Apple putting something out like this - we'd think standards had slipped in the design department.
Hello. We do have our previous dock called the TS3 which has two eSATA ports. It's on sale for $199.99 at the moment on our website.Lack of eSATA ports is a deal breaker.
http://www.caldigit.com/thunderbolt-3-dock/thunderbolt-station-3/Lack of eSATA ports is a deal breaker.
The USB-C ports on the TS3 Plus are for data only. To connect dual 4K monitors you would need to connect one to the DisplayPort connector and then use a USB-C Video Adapter on the spare Thunderbolt 3 port.Does the USB-C port support video?
If so, this would be the first dock on the market to support two 4K USB-C monitors over a single Thunderbolt 3 cable (by using both the USB-C port and the second Thunderbolt 3 port - which has USB-C backwards-compatibility).
Two LG UltraFine 4K displays over one cable would be nice.
We do have our previous Thunderbolt 3 dock, the TS3, which features two eSATA ports still available. It is currently on sale. http://www.caldigit.com/thunderbolt-3-dock/thunderbolt-station-3/A pity about the loss of eSATA. I would have been interested in using that to power an eSATA enclosure with SATA 3 SSD for boot and data. Better value than internal SSD even though obviously less performance than PCIe 4x.
I don't get it, why go with DisplayPort over Mini DisplayPort if this is targeted at Mac users? I feel the majority of us have Mini DisplayPort adapters for DVI, VGA, HDMI etc since that was the Apple standard for so many years. I've literally never seen anyone use or need DisplayPort, what a weird choice. Why make a dock this good with everything else and then throw in a port that I really doubt hardly anyone will use? An HDMI port would've at least made sense over DisplayPort, but a Mini DisplayPort would've at least been way more helpful for way more people.
Surely all the Tyoe-A ports on this dock (according to their picture diagrams that contradict the text specs above!) state they are type-A Gen.1 (i.e. 5 Gbit)? Confusing.
Also, is this for sale in GB£ anywhere, or are all European sales only conducted in Euros? Just wondering.
Also, can someone at MR actually clarify (or anyone else here confirm) that buying this with the 1 or 2 metre cables from the CalDigit's store would still offer USB 3 (5 or 10 Gbit) speeds
No, you're being too kind here... (as OCD, and largely irrelivant this is!). It's more than a couple of ports on the back that are off. And the front also has issues too.I kinda agree with you, BUT that's only a couple ports on the back that have slightly off alignment. If you have ever used a docking station, you would probably plug in Ethernet, Thunderbolt, DisplayPort and most USB ports on day one, then leave them there for few years. You wont care about how messy the cables are behind the dock; they would be very messy anyway, and that's the whole purpose of using dock where you can route all the cables to the dock and use only one cable to your laptop from the dock. It's not like an iPhone, you have to use it, feel it, and look at it every day. The Dock is meant to be installed on your desk and forget it.
The ports I use a lot is the front USB ports, not the backso I care more about the appearance on the front, not the back; TS3 Plus and TS3 have sleek design on the front, and I can understand why they have to put that many ports on the back and jam them together, after all, we need more missing ports back, the more the better
I would give an A+ for the feature, a TS3 Plus can provide; A- for the off-alignment design on the back panel unfortunately, and A++ for the pricing they offer.
The cable distinction is something you'll curse down the line when you've got a drawer full of superficially identical USB-C cables with half-a-dozen different permutations of features - or if you're on the hel(p)desk trying to explain it to users who are shaky on the difference between Windows and Word - but while your shiny new devices are still paired up with the shiny new cables you bought with them it will be OK.
Lack of eSATA ports is a deal breaker.