Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
@eyoungren It's very interesting to hear the opposite perspective for once. I always feel like I'm the only one who doesn't get it as pretty much everybody around me is talking about rural living as if it was the epitome of human existence, and I feel left out and somewhat alienated sometimes. The issues you mentioned are exactly what pops into my head first when I think about living in the countryside. My head immediately goes to all these potential problems whereas most other people do not seem to see them as such.
To be fair to most of the pro-rural types in this thread that advocate getting away from crowds and noise, etc., I am what some might classify as 'empathetic'. That is, I derive some of my internal energy from the energy around me. I have always enjoyed going to places where there are crowds (which is why I always liked malls) and 'feeling' the energy of people doing things and being out and about. It's a reason I visit coffee shops as well.

Perhaps I just need a sports drink or another cappucino, IDK. But the energy of crowds (with the exception of very large gatherings such as concerts, etc) has always attracted me.

You can't get that in a rural community. One of the reasons why when Bulletin Board Systems and modems came along in the 80s I jumped on them. It allowed a 14 year old to communicate beyond his rural borders. Forums and internet, phones and devices have since continued to enable that.

I still have other reasons to hate rural and thus will never return on my own, but I know this makes me different than a lot of other people in this country.
 
Different strokes for different folks. I live in the city. I want out but I'll never get there (wife, work, family etc.). I think there is one core reason for either tendency (rural or city): people. Either you want to be near them or you don't. For the young, the city is best. But having lived my entire life putting up with people, I am now fed up and would certainly be open to living without people being so close for a change (if only in my dreams).

EDIT: In reality, I am not sure I could live without the amenities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyoungren
This is my plan main reasons: I can retire at 37, Starlink and 5G allows for excellent download speeds anywhere, No government interference with my life (I can run non-catted cars or fire guns in my backyard and don't have to worry about a Karen neighbor calling the city), Airports are everywhere and flights are cheap I can choose to go to LA NYC or Chicago whenever I choose for food or shopping and still pay way less than rent would be in those cities.
I never had a problem with those rural people who moved far enough out to escape the boundary limits of certain laws. No, my problems were always with those families (and it was families, not just certain people) that believed that the law didn't apply to them or that simply weren't concerned about enforcement.

Those are the ones who have no respect for property lines and your property when they are trespassing upon it. But try and prove it. Property lines may be well marked, but respect for them isn't always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
I was born and raised in the SF Bay Area. Native Californian. When my wife and I retired in 2018, we bailed out. For good. High taxes, cost of living, Politics, you name it, drove us out.
We bought a home in NW Arkansas, the Ozarks. We haven't looked back, not for one second.
The crime rate here is non-existent, no spray painted graffiti anywhere. The people here are
very down to earth and friendly. That phrase "Southern Hospitality" is true. The air is clean, no smog, you can actually see stars at night. A great place to raise kids if you have a young family.
I miss California, especially the beaches. But I left, looking for a better place to live and enjoy life. So far I'd say I (we) made the right decision.
 
I was born and raised in the SF Bay Area. Native Californian. When my wife and I retired in 2018, we bailed out. For good. High taxes, cost of living, Politics, you name it, drove us out.
We bought a home in NW Arkansas, the Ozarks. We haven't looked back, not for one second.
The crime rate here is non-existent, no spray painted graffiti anywhere. The people here are
very down to earth and friendly. That phrase "Southern Hospitality" is true. The air is clean, no smog, you can actually see stars at night. A great place to raise kids if you have a young family.
I miss California, especially the beaches. But I left, looking for a better place to live and enjoy life. So far I'd say I (we) made the right decision.
I have quite a few contacts in Arkansas. And although I don’t disagree with what you said, I can also point out the downside, is I’ve heard the mosquitoes are atrocious, the heat alone can exceed over 100° making it unbearable for various months, and there’s quite a bit of poverty in Arkansas, which is why there’s cheaper cost of living. But I do agree with the southern hospitality , being somebody that lived in East-Tennessee for years.

The only thing I want to say about living down in the south, everything moves in s-l-o-w motion. Literally. And the only other drawback that I have a direct observation on, is the workforce experience seems to be to a lesser degree, with not enough training, poorly trained or lacking there-of. This isn’t to denigrate anyone, but I’ve lived in Texas, Tennessee, and I’ve been to Arkansas, and it seems to be prevalent compared to some of the training standards that I see are much higher here in the Midwest. Also, it’s probably one of the reasons I think the quality of the workforce is not on par in states like Arkansas, because their pay is much lower compared to many industries here in the Midwest, where the pay is higher.
 
NW Arkansas is the exception to the rule. The I-49 corridor (Fayetteville) reminds me a lot of California, say 20-25 years ago. Wages are less here than the Bay Area for sure, but you can still buy a house on a lake for under $200k (that is changing too). Walmart is the big employer here along with JB Hunt. With anything, there are trade-offs for sure. Herds of Deer transverse my property weekly. It gets cold here, last year during the winter it dropped to -15. That was all time low for this area. It gets hot, a bit humid but not as hot as the Central Valley in California we moved from. 110 in the summer was quite common (Fresno).
 
This is something I've experienced ever since moving to the US a little over six years ago, and I feel it's happening more and more frequently.

I'm at a party or other social event, making small talk with friends of friends and almost every time I am at one of these social gatherings someone proudly exclaims that they have just purchased a tract of land, somewhere between 5-15 acres, somewhere out in the boonies in the middle of nowhere at least an hour or two away from the city. They plan to build a house there and move out once they're retired, they're old, the kids are in college, etc. pp. It's always the exact same spiel. Mind you, this is not coming from people trying to escape an inner-city apartment in overpopulated urban areas such as San Francisco, Chicago, or New York but people already living in what can only be described as suburbian mansions 20-30 minutes away from the city.

Whenever I ask people why the response is always along the lines of "I don't want to grow old in the city" or "I want to escape city life" or "I want more land". As someone who has lived either directly in or in the suburbs of big cities my entire life (the smallest city I have lived in was Detroit, with a population of around 640,000) this is something I find impossible to understand. Why would I want to escape the benefits of cities, especially if I already live out in the comfort of suburbia? Why would I want 10 acres of land? Why would I want to drive 20 minutes or more to the next grocery store, 30 minutes or more to the next hardware store, or an hour or more to the next medical facility (especially if I am going to need the latter much more frequently as I grow older)?

What am I missing? Is this a cultural thing deeply engrained in the American mindset that oen must own land and that I as a foreigner that wasn't raised in this country simply cannot understand? Have I not been exposed to my fellow citizens long enough to develop the deep misanthropic hatred that would drive me out to the middle of nowhere? I honestly am completely flabbergasted and lost as to why this seems to be the norm rather than the exception around here.

Has someone here done this recently and if so, can you help me understand?

The fact that you’ve lived in Detroit, but can’t answer this question yourself…?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rhett7660 and mj_

Results: Life expectancy was inversely related to levels of rurality. In 2005-2009, those in large metropolitan areas had a life expectancy of 79.1 years, compared with 76.9 years in small urban towns and 76.7 years in rural areas.

and the disparity is growing. Access to healthcare drives a lot of it.

But then, in the boonies, strangers are less likely to relieve themselves outside your front door. Depends on your priorities, I guess….

And the McMansion living you’re describing isn’t really city living. You can’t walk to dinner, but you still have to hear the neighbors’ parties and please the HOA. I suspect the people you’re describing may have preferred rural living all along but compromised on the suburbs because that’s where the better schools are for their kids. Moving to the boonies is the dream that keeps them going until they can finally exit the rat race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moonman239



and the disparity is growing. Access to healthcare drives a lot of it.

But then, in the boonies, strangers are less likely to relieve themselves outside your front door. Depends on your priorities, I guess….

And the McMansion living you’re describing isn’t really city living. You can’t walk to dinner, but you still have to hear the neighbors’ parties and please the HOA. I suspect the people you’re describing may have preferred rural living all along but compromised on the suburbs because that’s where the better schools are for their kids. Moving to the boonies is the dream that keeps them going until they can finally exit the rat race.
Healthcare is a valid concern when you are rural I bought some land about 2hrs from DC and about 45 minutes from a Trader Joes and Whole Foods. I should be able to eat healthy and have access to world class healthcare the only big drawback is immediate care I would need a life flight for anything really serious that popped up unexpectedly. Less stress though should in theory extend my life but who knows its all a gamble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: max2
I honestly am completely flabbergasted and lost as to why this seems to be the norm rather than the exception around here.
I'd say your experience has many dimensions to it. I don't think there is a simple, all encompassing answer but a lot of the beliefs, values, and emotions that drive Americans' geographic preferences are both deeply rooted in American culture and mythology as well as in societal changes in the United States from the mid 1960s to the present.

Further, the views you hear are going to be heavily influenced by the people you work and socialize with. If they are demographically or psychographically homogenous, you're pretty likely to hear a lot of the same things over and over again.

If you're interested in doing a deeper dive than is possible on an online message board, here are some suggestions to get you started:
Democracy in America (de Tocqueville)
Bowling Alone (Putnam)
Moral Politics (Lakoff)
The Culture of Fear (Glassner)
The New Geography (Kotkin)
Fear of Falling (Ehrenreich)
The Paradox of Choice (Schwartz)
 
Last edited:
This is something I've experienced ever since moving to the US a little over six years ago, and I feel it's happening more and more frequently.

I'm at a party or other social event, making small talk with friends of friends and almost every time I am at one of these social gatherings someone proudly exclaims that they have just purchased a tract of land, somewhere between 5-15 acres, somewhere out in the boonies in the middle of nowhere at least an hour or two away from the city. They plan to build a house there and move out once they're retired, they're old, the kids are in college, etc. pp. It's always the exact same spiel. Mind you, this is not coming from people trying to escape an inner-city apartment in overpopulated urban areas such as San Francisco, Chicago, or New York but people already living in what can only be described as suburbian mansions 20-30 minutes away from the city.

Whenever I ask people why the response is always along the lines of "I don't want to grow old in the city" or "I want to escape city life" or "I want more land". As someone who has lived either directly in or in the suburbs of big cities my entire life (the smallest city I have lived in was Detroit, with a population of around 640,000) this is something I find impossible to understand. Why would I want to escape the benefits of cities, especially if I already live out in the comfort of suburbia? Why would I want 10 acres of land? Why would I want to drive 20 minutes or more to the next grocery store, 30 minutes or more to the next hardware store, or an hour or more to the next medical facility (especially if I am going to need the latter much more frequently as I grow older)?

What am I missing? Is this a cultural thing deeply engrained in the American mindset that oen must own land and that I as a foreigner that wasn't raised in this country simply cannot understand? Have I not been exposed to my fellow citizens long enough to develop the deep misanthropic hatred that would drive me out to the middle of nowhere? I honestly am completely flabbergasted and lost as to why this seems to be the norm rather than the exception around here.

Has someone here done this recently and if so, can you help me understand?
A question:

Is this "someone" - or are these "someones" - (who announce this purchase) male or female?

I've known people (sometimes, educated professional people with extremely good careers) who - when they approached retirement - stated that they wished to do this - and, who actually did do this, but, they were almost exclusively male.

By way of marked - and striking - contrast, in my experience, their wives suffered/endured/barely tolerated (and sometimes loathed) this change to arcadian rural bliss.
 
Louis Rossmann of YouTube fame recently moved to a rural area from living in New York City. He just posted on this very topic today. He primarily points to the many downsides of city living and its negative effects on his mental health for his wanting to get away -- in addition to the cost of living. He says he spends less to live better.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mj_ and Hombre53
A question:

Is this "someone" - or are these "someones" - (who announce this purchase) male or female?

I've known people (sometimes, educated professional people with extremely good careers) who - when they approached retirement - stated that they wished to do this - and, who actually did do this, but, they were almost exclusively male.

By way of marked - and striking - contrast, in my experience, their wives suffered/endured/barely tolerated (and sometimes loathed) this change to arcadian rural bliss.
I can see this. I'm a runner, hiker and backpacker who loves to hide in the outdoors, while my wife's idea of camping is staying at a hotel without a hair dryer. She would be very unhappy with rural living, while I would probably do okay with it. The good news for her is I'm not interested in what I would call "deep rural" living.
 
Inherited a house in rural Va. hate it. Moved an hour away to get conveniences. Cost of living is great, but thats it. Only things to do are work, church and eat. I only stay there on snow days for my job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
This is something I've experienced ever since moving to the US a little over six years ago, and I feel it's happening more and more frequently.

I'm at a party or other social event, making small talk with friends of friends and almost every time I am at one of these social gatherings someone proudly exclaims that they have just purchased a tract of land, somewhere between 5-15 acres, somewhere out in the boonies in the middle of nowhere at least an hour or two away from the city. They plan to build a house there and move out once they're retired, they're old, the kids are in college, etc. pp. It's always the exact same spiel. Mind you, this is not coming from people trying to escape an inner-city apartment in overpopulated urban areas such as San Francisco, Chicago, or New York but people already living in what can only be described as suburbian mansions 20-30 minutes away from the city.

Whenever I ask people why the response is always along the lines of "I don't want to grow old in the city" or "I want to escape city life" or "I want more land". As someone who has lived either directly in or in the suburbs of big cities my entire life (the smallest city I have lived in was Detroit, with a population of around 640,000) this is something I find impossible to understand. Why would I want to escape the benefits of cities, especially if I already live out in the comfort of suburbia? Why would I want 10 acres of land? Why would I want to drive 20 minutes or more to the next grocery store, 30 minutes or more to the next hardware store, or an hour or more to the next medical facility (especially if I am going to need the latter much more frequently as I grow older)?

What am I missing? Is this a cultural thing deeply engrained in the American mindset that oen must own land and that I as a foreigner that wasn't raised in this country simply cannot understand? Have I not been exposed to my fellow citizens long enough to develop the deep misanthropic hatred that would drive me out to the middle of nowhere? I honestly am completely flabbergasted and lost as to why this seems to be the norm rather than the exception around here.

Has someone here done this recently and if so, can you help me understand?
My inlaws did exactly that, and years ago they bought a large-ish property they moved to when they retired. They used to live in a typical suburban house, now their house is larger and newer, they have their own private lake to fish, a few acres to play farmer on and grow their own veggies, an orchard, there's a local population of deer in their forest, they have their own makeshift shooting range for plinking, property taxes are much lower than where they lived before... The list goes on. They are not city people so for them –jobs aside– there's many downsides to living in a city, and now they are retired so that's doesn't matter anymore. Medical services is a factor to consider, definitely, but their attitude in that regard is that they'll cross that bridge when they get there, and they probably have a good 10 years before they have to worry about that. If it was just a small house and a small yard like they used to have in the city it might be different, but they have built an amazing place over the years, so why would they want to stay in a city? To be 10 minutes away from the local Walmart? They are retired, so they can easily do all their grocery shopping in a longer half-day escapade and be done for a couple of weeks. For shopping, 1hr drive in the countryside vs 1/2 hr drive with traffic seems like an improvement when they have nothing else to do with their time to be honest. Different strokes and all that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OtoPA
Is this "someone" - or are these "someones" - (who announce this purchase) male or female?
That is an excellent question that I have not yet contemplated. Thinking about it I have to say it's both with a heavy bias on the male side. I know of at least two females that can't or couldn't wait to escape suburbia for a more peaceful and hassle-free (re: no people) life in the countryside. One that grew up and lived in cities and suburbs all around the world her entire life and has already moved out (aforementioned neighbors/friends that now live an hour away) and one that grew up in the countryside in upstate New York and only moved to the city for college and later work. Other than that it's exclusively men. That is a very interesting observation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
LOL, from the perspective of a lot of city dwellers, you've already moved to the "boonies"......so why did you move to the suburbs?
I thought about that as well, and I think you're absolutely right. 20-year old me would probably hate it.

My wife and I moved here for a number of reasons, chief of which was the fact that I was sick of paying rent and housing in Austin itself was and remains incredibly expensive and comparatively cramped. We looked at a few houses in the city and nothing really tickled our fancy. As a life-long city dweller I can assure you that it definitely felt like moving out to the middle of nowhere for us at first but after living here for five years I would dare say that for me, suburbs seem to an adequate compromise. It's comparatively quiet without being desolate. It's comparatively affordable without lacking the services I was accustomed to in the city. I have a long green belt behind the house and miles upon miles of hiking trails all around me. At the same time I have neighbors I can socialize with, an elementary and middle school within walking distance (both less than 10 minutes away), a giant grocery store 10 minutes away by car, and pretty much everything else I need on a daily basis no further than 15-20 minutes by car.
 
But having lived my entire life putting up with people, I am now fed up and would certainly be open to living without people being so close for a change (if only in my dreams).
That is an interesting statement, as it is one that I keep hearing over and over again. What is it about people that you are fed up with? Is it specific people that drive you up the walls? Is it the sheer number of people you are surrounded by, and if so how and why?
 
That is an interesting statement, as it is one that I keep hearing over and over again. What is it about people that you are fed up with? Is it specific people that drive you up the walls? Is it the sheer number of people you are surrounded by, and if so how and why?
It's not the number of people -- it's more their nature when living in a densely populated city. Either people have gotten less considerate over time or my tolerance is wearing thin the older I get (or some combination).
 
That is an excellent question that I have not yet contemplated. Thinking about it I have to say it's both with a heavy bias on the male side. I know of at least two females that can't or couldn't wait to escape suburbia for a more peaceful and hassle-free (re: no people) life in the countryside. One that grew up and lived in cities and suburbs all around the world her entire life and has already moved out (aforementioned neighbors/friends that now live an hour away) and one that grew up in the countryside in upstate New York and only moved to the city for college and later work. Other than that it's exclusively men. That is a very interesting observation.
In my experience, this desire, or marked preference (for rural bliss) is almost exclusively male.

For a variety of reasons (some physical, - i.e. lack of amenities, (shops, schools, libraries, coffee shops, etc) poor transport links, - especially if the woman doesn't drive, or have independent access to transport - isolation, lack of cultural outlets (theatre, cinema, book-shops, etc) - and socio-cultural, - traditional views and attitudes may be more deeply rooted in the countryside) - not to mention the fact that rural living (especially if one has to try to make a living from the land) is often thankless, unending, demanding, difficult and tedious - women tend to view life in the countryside through a lens that is anything but romantic.

My mother came from the countryside (granted, from a comfortable background), but loathed it, and invariably used the verb "escaped" to describe her feelings when she was sent to boarding school.
 
Last edited:
That is an interesting statement, as it is one that I keep hearing over and over again. What is it about people that you are fed up with? Is it specific people that drive you up the walls? Is it the sheer number of people you are surrounded by, and if so how and why?

People seem to have a declining respect for others that I believe comes from, and is driven by, population density, smartphones and social media.

Some of the little things I've noticed over the last 10-15 years:
  • Not holding a door for a person walking directly behind you.
  • Carrying on a cell phone conversation, on speaker, while in line at a retail store. (while yelling into the phone as some do) No one wants to hear your loud conversations!
  • Carrying on a cell phone conversation, not on speaker, while in line at a retail store. (while yelling into the phone as some do) No one wants to hear half of your loud conversations!
  • Carrying on a cell phone conversation, while being waited on by a retail employee, either at checkout or say a deli counter. Constantly telling either the other party on the call or the retail employee to "hold on a sec".
  • Driving: running stop lights, pulling out in front of people, merging onto highways, etc. Merging is my biggest pet peeve, when merging, the flow of traffic on the highway has the right of way, you do not have the right to pull directly onto the highway at 25mph just because there is a line of traffic coming up behind you and you don't want to wait!
  • Civility in general seems to be sorely lacking, especially online. IMHO people are losing the ability to separate their "keyboard warrior" personas on social media from everyday real life and feel entitled to go nuclear over the smallest things. Notice the increase in the number of assaults in fast food restaurants over condiments or missing items?
  • Pedestrians crossing the street... Yes I know they have the right of way at most crosswalks etc but they make ZERO effort to look before they leap as they are staring at their phones. They also make no effort to get across the street in a timely fashion because they feel entitled to waltz along at their texting pace. People struggle to walk and text at the same time.
  • Pedestrians in parking lots outside stores, again staring at their phones while walking down the middle of the parking lot, no effort whatsoever to get out of drivers way.
  • Bicyclists in the garb of their favorite racer riding through stop signs and red lights! On one hand they want drivers to adhere to every little law that benefits them but when it comes to them.... all bets are off.
  • Worst of all... parents total disregard for their children's behavior in public, especially restaurants. Nothing sets me on edge more than trying to enjoy a good meal (not talking fast food) and the next table over contains 2 parents completely ignoring their 3 screaming kids or their 3 kids with 3 iPads at max volume all doing different things! God forbid you say anything or give them a look because then they climb up on their soapbox and start yelling at you that "children are children, what do you want me to do?". How about teaching your children some basic manners and discipline. Soccer mom's on a lunch "play date" are insufferable, all they want to do is gossip over a glass of wine while their respective children run all over the restaurant "playing".
There are a million other small things that by themselves aren't the worst insults but combined they are eroding our general civility, hence the desire to "get away".

My profession requires a lot of travel and honestly cities put me on edge, I cannot wait to get out of them. That is not to say that rude folks don't exist in the suburbs or rural areas but overall they are either not as bad or more tolerable because there are less of them in a less dense community.

Thankfully I live in an area that is a middle ground of sorts, close enough to the amenities but far enough away from heavy concentrations of people that I don't need to pine for land "in the middle of nowhere" but I certainly understand why some do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rhett7660 and mj_
In my experience, this desire, or marked preference (for rural bliss) is almost exclusively male.
A couple of social science-related factors that also may have an effect, IMHO:
  • In many households, domestic work and caregiving is exclusively or mostly done by women and girls. Less dense areas, where schools, stores, health care providers, community centers, and churches are distant from where people actually live, can, consequently, affect male daily lives less than female daily lives.
  • The ability to completely transfer one's residence, late in life, from one area to a new area requires a lot of social and financial resources. Currently, wealth is greatly concentrated in people with STEM backgrounds who, also currently, are predominantly male. As can be seen when comparing cities traditionally known for "high culture" (say, NYC and Boston) to cities known for "high tech" (say, San José and Seattle), there is a lower demand among people with STEM backgrounds for cultural amenities. So rich STEM guys aren't going to be that bothered by living in a rural area that doesn't have a symphony, art galleries, an opera company, dance companies, or museums.
Plus, I'd say that for people who are retired, having places like sports bars, nightclubs, and 24-hour restaurants nearby often isn't a priority.

----------
Edited to add:
"A person close to the job search who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to reveal its details, said that the SFMOMA position was not an easy sell to candidates, given San Francisco’s comparatively low-profile contemporary art scene and the tepid interest in art patronage among Silicon Valley moguls. "
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.