It definitely is. This whole thread reeks of Apple fanboys who forget that Apple Watches haven't had any new life changing features for 99% of people for many years and that there are people out there with 40 year old watches, most of them considered to be high tech back in the day, still working. I think that Apple should change their vintage policies for these, considering how cheap and easy to source their batteries are.Anyone else thinks 5 years is a bit quick nowadays?
No man, the S9 and S10 are significantly faster than the S4. Additionally, the AW4 does indeed have much less memory, restricting the software.Honestly, the CPU differences between models seem pretty underwhelming and shouldn't be limiting anything. The Series 4 appears to have 16 GB memory which was increased to 32 with the Series 5, which could explain this cutoff, as their CPUs were pretty much only different in name, IIRC, and my Series 4 still functions well. The only major jump currently is in the Ultra 2 with 64 GB, so the earlier generations shouldn't be holding anything back CPU wise that isn't exactly as Apple intends. There is no reason the other additional hardware features of the watches themselves should hold back the software, either, so it isn't like Apple would add suddenly more features than they already intended.
![]()
All Apple Watches Compared by Ken Rockwell
All Apple Watches Compared by Ken Rockwellwww.kenrockwell.com
Honestly, changing the battery is fairly simple. You can buy a kit on Amazon for $10-15 and do it yourself in less than 10 minutes with a battery that will cost you $20. Apple will charge you $79, I believe, for something so easy to do.It definitely is. This whole thread reeks of Apple fanboys who forget that Apple Watches haven't had any new life changing features for 99% of people for many years and that there are people out there with 40 year old watches, most of them considered to be high tech back in the day, still working. I think that Apple should change their vintage policies for these, considering how cheap and easy to source their batteries are.
7 years is not a long time to be considered “vintage”….
I definitely can feel the difference in performance going from the S4 to the S9. Apple is doing a tick-tock-tock progression with their AW SIPs, the S4/S6/S9 getting tick cycles. Going from S4 to S9 I got a slightly bigger always-on display that's also much brighter, sleep apnea detection via a coming software update, and the general snappier performance that comes with a processor upgrade (more responsive GPS, quicker app switching, faster syncing). Maybe the AW11 will also get a tick upgrade because of increased Apple Intelligence capability. I'll be fine without it there while Apple continues to work out the bugs.No man, the S9 and S10 are significantly faster than the S4. Additionally, the AW4 does indeed have much less memory, restricting the software.
The AW11 might be the biggest leap with the S11 and possibly a doubling of memory for AI features.
That is not to say those older watches do not still perform well for what they do. I’m a heavy user for fitness and I upgraded from the S5 to the S10 and outside of significant better battery life (with “always-on” display disabled), the capabilities have remained quite similar.
For me, I’d like to see the Apple Watch gain sensors that are possibly years away like:I definitely can feel the difference in performance going from the S4 to the S9. Apple is doing a tick-tock-tock progression with their AW SIPs, the S4/S6/S9 getting tick cycles. Going from S4 to S9 I got a slightly bigger always-on display that's also much brighter, sleep apnea detection via a coming software update, and the general snappier performance that comes with a processor upgrade (more responsive GPS, quicker app switching, faster syncing). Maybe the AW11 will also get a tick upgrade because of increased Apple Intelligence capability. I'll be fine without it there while Apple continues to work out the bugs.
Every time Apple updates their Vintage and Obsolete list I'm very curious why some really old devices still persist as Vintage devices and are not Obsolete. Were the 4th Gen iPod Touch and iPhone 4 8GB really still being sold less than 7 years ago alongside the 2019 iPhone 11 series and actually still have service and parts available in 2025? I have an old 4th Gen iPod Touch that I'm tempted to bring in to the Apple Store for a battery replacement just to see what they say.About vintage products
Products are considered vintage when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 5 and less than 7 years ago.
iPod products vintage worldwide
iPhone products vintage worldwide
- iPod touch (4th generation)
- iPhone 4 (8GB)
My point is I’m happy my S3 is still going strong. Still completely functional and the original battery is good. No need to update it. Completely rational.And your point is???? Should Apple support every device that may still be working? Not rational.
Honestly, the CPU differences between models seem pretty underwhelming and shouldn't be limiting anything. The Series 4 appears to have 16 GB memory which was increased to 32 with the Series 5, which could explain this cutoff, as their CPUs were pretty much only different in name, IIRC, and my Series 4 still functions well. The only major jump currently is in the Ultra 2 with 64 GB, so the earlier generations shouldn't be holding anything back CPU wise that isn't exactly as Apple intends. There is no reason the other additional hardware features of the watches themselves should hold back the software, either, so it isn't like Apple would add suddenly more features than they already intended.
![]()
All Apple Watches Compared by Ken Rockwell
All Apple Watches Compared by Ken Rockwellwww.kenrockwell.com
Spot on with the Good Value Statement!Perception of time gets faster the older you get.
This watch was a good value and lasted a long time at 7 years but the longer electronics get updates, the better.
Wow, I can't always get through a full day since Watch OS9Not at all, my battery lasts for a day and a half / 2 days on average.
Same with my Apple Watch SE and I can't afford a new watch at the moment + the new ones are probably coming soon.I'm still wearing my Series 4 every day. 82% battery health remaining.![]()
Well, 5 and 6 generation newer CPUs being significantly faster is pretty underwhelming, honestly. I meant that between single models, such as in the S4 to S5, there isn’t a very big jump (in that specific case especially).No man, the S9 and S10 are significantly faster than the S4. Additionally, the AW4 does indeed have much less memory, restricting the software.
The AW11 might be the biggest leap with the S11 and possibly a doubling of memory for AI features.
That is not to say those older watches do not still perform well for what they do. I’m a heavy user for fitness and I upgraded from the S5 to the S10 and outside of significant better battery life (with “always-on” display disabled), the capabilities have remained quite similar.
To be fair, it seems like they have hit a wall watch the Apple Watch. The AW10 was a nice upgrade if you're coming from an AWS4, but it's not that crazy.Well, 5 and 6 generation newer CPUs being significantly faster is pretty underwhelming, honestly. I meant that between single models, such as in the S4 to S5, there isn’t a very big jump (in that specific case especially).
You made it sound like anything other than the most recent processor is holding things back, but I’m just of the opinion that Apple does what Apple wants, so if there was a feature they really wanted to add that the old hardware didn’t support, they would leave the hardware behind like floppies and USB-A.![]()