Only Apple gets to do that!
I'm not for anyone doing that ... just not sure exactly what service you're referring to form Apple.
Only Apple gets to do that!
Yes, it's true. CarPlay need not take over the entire display, and multiple manufacturers add their own interface elements around it, with varying results. Here is a recent example from BMW.Is that really the case? I heard that Apple requires (regular) CarPlay to take over the full display. There have been exceptions in the early days of CarPlan (for example, my wife's Jeep has ugly Jeep "frame" around the CarPlay. It is an eyesore I am sure Apple design team is not too happy about.
every vehicle is still going to be different, you still have to figure out where the windshield wipers are, or how to turn on the hazard lights, Car play doesn't solve that problem.
BBC sounds is a podcast app? you won't have the app on screen, but rivian can control the app via the steering wheel controls. you can use buttons for play/pause, skip/rewind 10 seconds etc.. arguably easier than using a screen.
I get that it's nice to use an app, but Rivian is based on Android, so once their user base is large enough, I imagine there is a good case to have BBC port it over. CarPlay isn't free. manufacturers have to spend money and time on the implementation and pay apple to certify it and many users don't care. as you saw in the article, users that thought they wanted it when they bought a rivian don't anymore.
Rivian is a niche brand with small sales. I assume most people who buy them are already willing to forego CarPlay / don’t care about it.Or they just resigned themselves to the situation and were , well, I suppose I can live without it.
Why the Rivian stance is so stupid, is that they just ask their own customers. Not the millions of POTENTIAL customers that are not buying certain cars because of missing features.
To be fair, evaluating a product or platform based on a willingness to try it rather than reactionary tribalism does require a little bit of courage and an open mind. Things that are in short supply these days.
It's ok, we get that you've got some sort of financial, ideological, or familial interest in Abdul Latif Jameel 🤣.
You don't have to copy anything, I can send points of interest to my car very easily, which I would only do on a longer road trip, aside from that native voice assistant can do it even faster. For me, the strongest points of carplay are so seldom used or thought of its trivial.I have curated favourites in Google Maps from 15 years ago. Places I visited and liked all there. I can easily forward an AirBnb address to phone nav and it'll navigate to destination. This the point of using the phone navigation on road trips and not having to copy all of relevant info into car's navigation.
This the reason that I'm in the "Carplay or I'm not buying that car" camp.
You don't have to copy anything, I can send points of interest to my car very easily, which I would only do on a longer road trip, aside from that native voice assistant can do it even faster. For me, the strongest points of carplay are so seldom used or thought of its trivial.
I'll take a good built in system like BMW, Tesla, Rivian over carplay anyday because the integration is much more seamless, it looks better and for EVs specifically its optimal - partly why the major EV manufacturers have robost native systems.
This would be a valid point if Rivian sales were comparable with other automakers.Another way to think of it is that they surveyed people who have actually used their native software, whom previously thought they needed CarPlay.
There were probably a lot of people who refused to buy a Model T because they we’re certain they needed a horse.
To be fair, evaluating a product or platform based on a willingness to try it rather than reactionary tribalism does require a little bit of courage and an open mind. Things that are in short supply these days.
That would help, I guess. But if the company is speaking out against it, it seems like that would deter some people from responding ("why bother?").The survey actually asked questions to current owners about whether they should spend time and resources implementing it.
How does this work anyway? From "share" screen you forward them to car app? For example, you need to navigate to some AirBnb address, which is in your email. How do you send this to the car nav?
Good luck starting your own music service and map service. Woof.
The point is that the vast majority of Rivian owners entered the brand thinking they wanted CarPlay, but after using the native system for awhile, no longer care about it.
No the big pro of carplay for those that own thousands of songs, is to control your music without looking down on your phone and geting ticket and forgoing an apple music or spotify subscription or ad based music.One of the biggest pros of CarPlay is that you have the same setup, same voice commands, same exact experience in every vehicle. You carry your vehicle interface with you. It doesn't change when you drive your other family car, rental car, dealership loaner, etc.
you know, if Rivian would offer a 14 day return no questions asked for their vehicles, like Apple for their products, then maybe people would have more of an open mind and courage ...Another way to think of it is that they surveyed people who have actually used their native software, whom previously thought they needed CarPlay.
There were probably a lot of people who refused to buy a Model T because they we’re certain they needed a horse.
To be fair, evaluating a product or platform based on a willingness to try it rather than reactionary tribalism does require a little bit of courage and an open mind. Things that are in short supply these days.
courage really? lol to courage to spend money and making a corporation profityou know, if Rivian would offer a 14 day return no questions asked for their vehicles, like Apple for their products, then maybe people would have more of an open mind and courage ...
the poster I responded to used the term "courage"courage really? lol to courage to spend money and making a corporation profit
I know a lady who was outed as gay when she was 16 in a small town and ended up writing to a the news paper to call people out for their bigotry. And this was in the 70s mind you. That's courage. Buying a damn truck or car... Not sure I'd use courage. I'd use the term fiscally flexible.
Another way to think of it is that they surveyed people who have actually used their native software, whom previously thought they needed CarPlay.
There were probably a lot of people who refused to buy a Model T because they we’re certain they needed a horse.
To be fair, evaluating a product or platform based on a willingness to try it rather than reactionary tribalism does require a little bit of courage and an open mind. Things that are in short supply these days.
You can click on an address in an email or elsewhere, no different than if you hit share to send it in messages or any other app, I select the BMW app and get a pop up option to send to my car without even opening the app. There are multiple ways to do this and other vehicles may vary.How does this work anyway? From "share" screen you forward them to car app? For example, you need to navigate to some AirBnb address, which is in your email. How do you send this to the car nav?
Some find Rivian's and Tesla's native apple music app superior to the carplay version.Rivian already has Google maps, Apple Music, Audible, and Spotify built-in.
Problem is that (1) none of them functions as well as CarPlay version of the same, (2) there in an endless number of services they do not have built-in.
Rivian is a niche brand just like Tesla was in 2016. But R2 is going to be huge. Just like model y was for Tesla. The difference is that Tesla stopped trying after the model y. They don’t have a roadmap for any new models outside of the 2 seater cyber cab.Rivian is a niche brand with small sales. I assume most people who buy them are already willing to forego CarPlay / don’t care about it.
And those who want CarPlay won’t buy a Rivian.
So they will remain a niche brand until they are bought by someone larger, go under, or figure out a way to grow.
For comparison:
Rivian had a successful 2025 with just over 42,000 vehicle sales.
Tesla in the same year sold over 1,636,000 vehicles.
Mitsubishi, that barely has a presence on the American market, sold just under 95,000 vehicles in the US.
you're thinking too small, give it a year or two and everyone will have their own MCP that will allow them to retain context across any AI agent. and the AI agents will be good enough that you won't know if you're using Claude or Gemini, or ChatGPT. The Rivian also has a brain that processes 1600 TOPs, while your latest iPhone has 35. so whatever your iPhone can do the rivian will be able to do faster.Even if the answer is "AI' the phone lets you choose which AI and use it with your data instead of whatever isloated thing Rivian wants to ship and update.
Ok i misquoted the Rivian Data, it isn't that people that already bought the car don't care, it's that new buyers don't care. which is an even worse situation for CarPlay. Does car play have some neat features that i wish Rivian had? sure, maybe... but none of them would dramatically increase my satisfaction with the car or allow me to do something that I can't already do. So tell me why I need it?You have statistics on that?
I hesitated buying Rivian for years due to lack of CarPlay. Now that I do have R1S, I love the car, BUT I still would love to have CarPlay that complements the Rivian's system to allow doing things that Rivian does not allow me to do.