Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I can’t “force” you to answer a question, but not answering the question shows intellectual dishonesty. 🙄
if the question is answerable, then why don't you tell us "how many accidents did FSD avoid?"

why is the onus on me to answer that?

there's no intellectual dishonesty there
 
Last edited:
if the question is answerable, then why don't you tell us "how many accidents did FSD avoid?"

why is the onus on me to answer that?

there's no intellectual dishonesty there
It’s an important question to answer. Just as important as how many “accidents”. It’s a talking point, like other discussion items that were brought up as it shows the veracity of the system and stops the detractors.
 
It’s an important question to answer. Just as important as how many “accidents”. It’s a talking point, like other discussion items that were brought up as it shows the veracity of the system and stops the detractors.

Ok then why haven’t you told us how many if it’s so important to your case?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: I7guy
Ok then why haven’t you told us how many if it’s so important to your case?
As important as it is to “my case” it should be just as important to “your case”, if we’re
discussing the veracity of autonomous driving system, hence the question which seemingly you said, “nope too difficult, not even going to attempt”. You can have the last word. 😝
 
As important as it is to “my case” it should be just as important to “your case”, if we’re
discussing the veracity of autonomous driving system

I’m not even sure what “the veracity of autonomous driving system” means

I certainly haven’t claimed that any particular system is true or false

Edit: @I7guy, I presume you are laughing at your own butchery of the English language?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: I7guy
😂 Me saying facts that are backed up by official sources makes it true.



😂 Calling "bottom" applies to practically any stats, which is typically used in stock price. Delivery numbers aren't treated differently.

uh oh

😂 No, I just explained bottom doesn't mean forever. LITERALLY just explained it to you and you still can't understand it. This is incredible.
uh oh...earnings didn't go so well...
😂 Volume that maxed out their production where you will get one delivered in 2027 if you ordered today
doesn't sound like they are making much money from them... if any



won't bother trying to explain everything else to you again. pretty clear how wrong you are on the Tesla's earnings.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: I7guy

uh oh


uh oh...earnings didn't go so well...

doesn't sound like they are making much money from them... if any



won't bother trying to explain everything else to you again. pretty clear how wrong you are on the Tesla's earnings.
Tsla is killing it in sales. All these financials will rebound, imo.
 
Tsla is killing it in sales. All these financials will rebound, imo.

Yep.
1) Tesla CFO quote: "We exited Q2 with our largest order backlog since 2023". Largest demand in terms of backorder for cars since 2023.
2) Their investments such as Research and Development+expansion went from went from $2.4 billion in previous quarter to $5.7 billion, doubling investments which makes the quarter look bad because it pulls down cashflow. They're obviously investing in chip design and optimus.

Tesla expects to hit $25 billion in CapEx (basically Research and Development) in 2026. $25B - $2.4B - $5.7B = $16.9B for Q3 + Q4. Financials are going to look seemingly bad but the demand for products have not waned.
 
Last edited:

uh oh


uh oh...earnings didn't go so well...

Tesla CFO: "We exited Q2 with our largest order backlog since 2023".

Uh oh, turns out a record quarter deliveries exited that quarter with the largest order backlog since 2023.

😂

doesn't sound like they are making much money from them... if any
Guessing.

won't bother trying

none of the tries landed in the basket, unfortunately.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.