Let me see how this works…
You saying that constantly doesn’t make it true.
😂 Me saying facts that are backed up by official sources makes it true.
you’re talking about the stock now? Who is moving goal posts? We are talking earnings, deliveries. Tesla stock price is already way overvalued.
😂 Calling "bottom" applies to practically any stats, which is typically used in stock price. Delivery numbers aren't treated differently.
So Tesla is up and to the right forever?
😂 No, I just explained bottom doesn't mean forever. LITERALLY just explained it to you and you still can't understand it. This is incredible.
Yeah? What are the volumes? Last I heard 10% of total demand was coming from SpaceX.
😂 Volume that maxed out their production where you will get one delivered in 2027 if you ordered today
Define success for the Cybertruck.
😂 Moving goal posts once again, you claimed they aren’t making any. Yet they're making as much as they can from their line and delivering every single one. Even the used CTs were sold out at one point. Also saw a post of one of the original founders edition selling more than they bought it for.
The statement "Cyber truck be sold out because they aren’t making any." is objectively false.
So how many of the 50 tesla cabs are cyber cabs?
😂 That's a different question than the original claim. Moving goal posts once again.
I did. Literally said "see above for the explanation
Answer the questions.
1. Is Waymo less than perfect?
2. Do you accept Waymos being on the road?
Basic yes or no questions. If you do not answer these questions with either yes or no, then it's clear you haven't answered at all.
I get you are changing what you're saying after the fact.
I’ve maintained the same meaning
😂 It's so false.
You don’t know that’s the case.
Sure I do.
frankly your premise that (if they agreed and saw the pole, the score would be higher)
assumes the score is read-out of sensor agreement, but it isn't. its a readout of estimated harm.
If they trust more on the camera system and the camera system's inference returned nothing or something that's able to be driven through, it's clear they put less weight on the telephone pole coming from the lidar data.
Imagine a plastic bag floating in the lane. Both the camera and Lidar could detect it clearly and agree completely that it is there, but the damage score would still be Zero, because it's a plastic bag. So even if we accept what you say, the error isn't in sensor contention, it's in damage weighting.
Actually across time, even without cameras, lidar can pick up an object to be classified as a plastic bag. Because an object that flies/floats like a plastic bag can easily be classified as something that won't cause damage at all. A camera would confirm this but even if the camera system failed to infer it completely, lidar's inference would suggest it's a low damage scoring object and drive straight through.
Meanwhile, a tall pole, fixed in position, there's no question lidar can pick up as a telephone pole. But because it was still classified as a low damage score, it's clear that their system put more weight into the camera system that failed to pick up on the pole, despite the camera sensors can clearly see it is a telephone pole.
You gave a terrible example.
The cybertruck didn't seem to get that
Based on the erroneous assumption that driver didn't press on the accelerator, which in many cases it has happened.
you've blamed a lot on "sensor contention" without actually backing it up.
I've backed it up with how it works.
Meanwhile you seem to just assume it was FSD that caused a cybertruck crash with zero evidence to back that up.
just assumptions and conjecture.
I've showed you many times where a driver lied about FSD/autopilot causing crashes when in reality, the data showed the driver pressed the accelerator.
find me a source that confirms it,
It's axiomatic, but happy to hear other explanations. Your plastic bag example didn't disprove what I said.
Just Elons words, and your assumptions.
And waymo's explanation. You know. The part about damage scoring and how they fused the data and run inference
You saying that doesn’t make it true.
Point to where I made a generalization of *every* tesla crash and generalizations of *any* waymo crash. Direct quote please. If you cannot provide this, your argument failed.
FSD is funny that way, always easy to blame the user.
1. That's your argument? "FSD is funny"? 😂 conjecture.
2. many times the data has showed the user to be lying about fsd/autopilot, even one went to jail for it.
oh good, I'm glad you're coming to see the light.
Still waiting for where I said anything about "all waymo crashes". Direct quote please. Show me.
bradmunchen.substack.com
www.teslarati.com
