Buy a pc to play games
A Mac is a PC these day's genius. Boot windows and you'll have a better PC than 95% of the rest of the world.
Buy a pc to play games
It don't seem you understand my original message that the Mac Pro's may "potentially sport" the Nvidia 700 GPU series, I did not infer they absolutely will. In regards to the performance of the rMBP, if you can't provide evidence of higher values in performance nor 'benchmarks' then your argument remains invalid.
Even playing Crysis 3 on my unit is absolutely unplayable when I need at least 45+ FPS to game smoothly. I'm using low-medium settings with a resolution of 1440x900, as well as the latest graphics cards. Below is a chart of different settings and framerates of how playable it is.
People should really stop using notebookcheck as the holy grail.
Let me point out where you are just plain wrong in so many levels.
1. The GPU clocks listet on notebookcheck isnt the ones used by Apple. Apple overclocked the factory clockspeeds and put the card in the rmbp.
1.1 Its also really easily overclocked to 1035/2700. But the standard 900/2500 is well overclocked fram factory clocks.
2. The notebook site gives no reference on what CPU is being used.
2.1 For us who have been here a while remember the change from nvidia 320m to intel hd 3000 in 2011. on macbook airs and pros (not 15"). Notebook check clearly listed the hd 3000 as better then the 320m. However, when people investigated more, it was found out that the intel d 3000, was running along with a quad core i7, and the 320m was running with core 2 duo. In those comparison between hd 3000 vs 320m.
Fair? No. The 320m was a better card, cleary, at least in Windows.
3. With vsync off, im getting anything from 50-80 fps on crysis, with high texture packs on high, everything else medium. 1280x800. And thats with ****** drivers. So crysis 3 is definitly more then playable on the macbook pro retina.
I have already taken account of the overclocked performance of the rMBP, comparing it equally to a GTX 660m. I am just trying to prove my point that a HD 5770 performs above the rMBP's GPU, which it does and with a score of 17844 in the 3D Mark 06 test. According to GPU-Z, regardless of the core frequency of the GT 650M being 900 MHz under load, the system scored 14848 points in the 3DMark 06 test, which places its performance right below a GTX 660m with a value of 15019.8. If you want to factor in processors as well than we still won't see any significant performance boosts, as either machine is most likely using similar quad-core processors.
Even though I may be referencing notebookcheck a lot, it is still a reliable source to gather 'average' benchmark results. If you want to see the REAL values of what each computer's GPU is capable of then you would check out the actual reviews of the unit that detail everything.
Crysis 3 is playable no doubt, but it's not as enticing if you need to sacrifice using a resolution lower than the rMBP's scaled native resolution (1440x900).
I have already taken account of the overclocked performance of the rMBP, comparing it equally to a GTX 660m. I am just trying to prove my point that a HD 5770 performs above the rMBP's GPU, which it does and with a score of 17844 in the 3D Mark 06 test. According to GPU-Z, regardless of the core frequency of the GT 650M being 900 MHz under load, the system scored 14848 points in the 3DMark 06 test, which places its performance right below a GTX 660m with a value of 15019.8. If you want to factor in processors as well than we still won't see any significant performance boosts, as either machine is most likely using similar quad-core processors.
Not really related but for some reason windows won't let me pick 1440x900I have already taken account of the overclocked performance of the rMBP, comparing it equally to a GTX 660m. I am just trying to prove my point that a HD 5770 performs above the rMBP's GPU, which it does and with a score of 17844 in the 3D Mark 06 test. According to GPU-Z, regardless of the core frequency of the GT 650M being 900 MHz under load, the system scored 14848 points in the 3DMark 06 test, which places its performance right below a GTX 660m with a value of 15019.8. If you want to factor in processors as well than we still won't see any significant performance boosts, as either machine is most likely using similar quad-core processors.
Even though I may be referencing notebookcheck a lot, it is still a reliable source to gather 'average' benchmark results. If you want to see the REAL values of what each computer's GPU is capable of then you would check out the actual reviews of the unit that detail everything.
Crysis 3 is playable no doubt, but it's not as enticing if you need to sacrifice using a resolution lower than the rMBP's scaled native resolution (1440x900).
You do have a point with DX9 testing. Move into DX10-11 and the 5770 becomes quite a bit slower very quickly. Same as my 5870. The 650m gets close to leveling the field with DX10-11 based games. The procs in the retina are quite a bit faster than any Quad Mac Pro. But they make no difference in the results for graphic tests like these.
You do realize the HD 5770 supports DirectX 11 right?
henrikrox, i have rMBP 2.6 ghz 8 GB RAM, and temperature of my GPU (with stock 900mhz) is 78-85, when im playing games. So I have throttle of GPU to 725 mhz. How u think its hardware problem?
use a fan control before starting to play games, and set it to max 6000rpm. i had the same problem with throttling, because the fans wouldnt spin up to much, resulting in the computer getting warm.
If u see the vid i postet, it never goes go 70 degrees C, and thats with a overclock.
So try to run the games with the fans at max, and see if u see a difference
What program are you using to control your fans in Windows? Speedfan doesn't show the existence of my fans for some odd reason.
LubbosFanControl
If you have the rMBP, u need to open the FanControl.infi file in notepad, and change the following setting to:
CPUkey=TC0F
To stop the fans spinning at max all the time
use a fan control before starting to play games, and set it to max 6000rpm. i had the same problem with throttling, because the fans wouldnt spin up to much, resulting in the computer getting warm.
If u see the vid i postet, it never goes go 70 degrees C, and thats with a overclock.
So try to run the games with the fans at max, and see if u see a difference
Your CPU Is way to hot.So I did 3 videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCw5hP9iFL8 - without lubos, Turbo ON
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdtw6Hq1sh8 - with lubos, Turbo ON
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cx05QPK31ic - with lubos, Turbo OFF
screenshots of MSI Afterburner and RealTemp under the videos.
So I have hiccaps, skips frames.
GPU from 900 mhz to 725 mhz
CPU from 2.6 ghz to 1.2 ghz
Your CPU Is way to hot.
Is that with fans at 6000 rpm? My GPU never goes over 75. And the CPU never goes over 85.
Seems like a bad thermal paste job or something. What's your room temp?
I answered you on YouTube. I tried lubbos tsontrol 6000 RPM fan and CPU Turbo Stop by setting min/max CPU state lower than 100%. So It's look better, but it's throttling again after 10 minutes of playing, and my temperature with lubbos fan control, and CPU Turbo off is about 80-85, before it's throttling. So u have much colder macbook... Maybe I need to go to Apple Store and get repair?
Set your CPU to 95% under Processor power management/Maximum processor state plugged in.
Your temps will drop dramatically without affecting performance and you will be happily gaming for hours without throttling.
Try 95% then and report back.
I keep mine at 95% and have never throttled at all no matter how many hours i game.
I have a base spec 15inch RMBP though so your CPU i imagine runs hotter but more of a reason to drop it to 95%.
GPU usage will not be as high playing Diablo 3 so that is not a good example as even if it is pushing the CPU hard it will not be pushing the GPU the same as Crysis 3 will .
You would have to find something on OSX that will push the computer equally to Crysis 3 then your can start drawing comparisons about throttling or not.