Yeah, I already have that so that would not be an increase for me. Thanks.
I fail to understand the resolution that these doorbells produce.
Given the IMPORTANCE of knowing who is stealing your mail, packages breaking into your door, robbing you or whatever WTH are is wrong with the resolution capabilities?
Yes, I expect that for the money they are charging, they AT LEAST provide Face Tracking, autofocus and 2K Video at a minimum. Some of the Next video's I have seen of thieves ripping packages off, could be a family member - and you couldn't tell by the lousy quality of the video.
Do insurance companies give a discount when customers use tech like this? If so, I bet that's how they are justifying the price.
Actually it's in a Family Share Acct. Someone else is paying for it.Why? You “hate” subscriptions.
But it’s a bell for your door!!!!Wow, 600 for a doorbell - that's just crazy.
The odds of that are more than unlikely. I save monthly by having the cheapest internet service ($50/mo vs $75) and no subscription ($3+ a month). The math works for me. Plus I get HD and can add cameras where and how I like them.
Macrumors - can y’all reach out to Netatmo to find out a release date on their doorbell. This is the one I’ve been waiting for but was supposed to be out last year....
![]()
Smart Doorbell | Netatmo
If a visitor rings your doorbell, you’ll be able to see and talk to them from your smartphone. Whether you’re at home or on the other side of the world.www.netatmo.com
Right on. Ours isn’t great at night but the 2k hikvision caught a meth addict stealing our $400 ssd drive off our porch. Posted it on facebook. In an hour and a half had a name. Forwarded it to police who tracked him down (homeless, bounces between 2 cities). About 6 months later they finally convicted him of our theft. The officer sat with him to wait for his court hearing. He looked down and saw his hat on the bench. And damn, it had the same color and logo on the bill as on the video. No we didn’t get our ssd or money back. Yeah I ended up giving $50 to the girl who identified him. But it was worth it. And I know what happened, when, and why.I fail to understand the resolution that these doorbells produce.
Given the IMPORTANCE of knowing who is stealing your mail, packages breaking into your door, robbing you or whatever WTH are is wrong with the resolution capabilities?
Yes, I expect that for the money they are charging, they AT LEAST provide Face Tracking, autofocus and 2K Video at a minimum. Some of the Next video's I have seen of thieves ripping packages off, could be a family member - and you couldn't tell by the lousy quality of the video.
You can get a Eufy doorbell cam for $120 right now on Amazon. It has 2K video and local storage so there is no subscription. The only downside is the Eufy doorbell cam is not currently homekit compatible. I was excited to read the headline on this story because I am wanting to replace my Ring doorbell with something Homekit Secure Video compatible but $664 USD (based on today's exchange rate) is a complete non-starter for me.
720p is pathetic in 2020. Spend an extra $10 on hardware and up the price by $15 and put in a 1080p. Either way, this doorbell is only worth $200 max, and that is pushing it.
Nearly $700 USD for a video doorbell? The folks at this company must be smoking some good stuff over there in Holland.
So true, you could buy two Apple branded USB cables for that much and still have enough change for a stick of chewing gum.Nearly $700 USD for a video doorbell? The folks at this company must be smoking some good stuff over there in Holland.
is there any evidence to show that such tech is effective?Do insurance companies give a discount when customers use tech like this?
I fail to understand the resolution that these doorbells produce.
Given the IMPORTANCE of knowing who is stealing your mail, packages breaking into your door, robbing you or whatever WTH are is wrong with the resolution capabilities?
Yes, I expect that for the money they are charging, they AT LEAST provide Face Tracking, autofocus and 2K Video at a minimum. Some of the Next video's I have seen of thieves ripping packages off, could be a family member - and you couldn't tell by the lousy quality of the video.
Thanks for sharing your experience with Eufy doorbell. I have already replaced my 2 Blink cameras with Eufy 2C cameras and I am VERY happy with them. I will probably go ahead and replace my Ring Doorbell Pro and my Ring Floodlight Cam with Eufy cameras in the very near future. I have emailed Eufy and they told me they are working on a new software feature to allow the Doorbell Cam to store video on a Homebase as a back up to only having it on the device itself (still no subscription, just a 2nd local storage option).Eufy, by Anker (the guys who make all sorts of chargers, vacuums, etc), is amazing. I had a Ring Pro for 2 years and it died the beginning of December. I started doing some research. I was looking to not pay a monthly fee but still wanted a decent app and it to look nice on the wall. Found the Eufy. Decided to give it a try since it was on sale for $119. The thing is a million times more reliable than the Ring Pro. I was so impressed I actually decided to try one of those robot vacuums because they sold those as well. Love both!!!
Homekit would be nice, and god knows I have enough non-homekit things connected with homebridge, but on a doorbell I don't really need it I only want it.
As much as I usually bag Apple, the 2TB plan is $14.99 AUD which I consider too pricey. If it did come with the ability to store 5 camera feeds that don't count to storage then I can see where Apple is transitioning to services to make up for flat or falling phone sales. I would pay $14.99 AUD a month for 2TB of data and 5 video streams.Not for me it isn't. This is what I have been waiting for. I would much rather pay a price upfront and budget for it than have continual ongoing subscription fees. I HATE SUBSCRIPTIONS!